Legl 2700 roessing test 3 - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries
Looking for the best study guides, study notes and summaries about Legl 2700 roessing test 3? On this page you'll find 27 study documents about Legl 2700 roessing test 3.
Page 3 out of 27 results
Sort by
-
UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) Questions and Answers
- Exam (elaborations) • 6 pages • 2023
- Available in package deal
-
- $11.49
- + learn more
UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) 
Questions and Answers 
Montz v Pilgrim Films & Television, INC. - Correct ️️ Plaintiff pitched idea to NBC and was 
rejected -> NBC created Ghost Hunters -> sued for breach of implied-in-fact contract to pay for 
the use of the reality show concept 
"as a result of cases like Montz, some firms are wary of accepting unsolicited product ideas 
unless a clearly defined contractual relationship exists" 
Gottlieb & Co INC. v. Alps South Corpora...
-
LEGL 2700- test 3 cases, Roessing Questions and Answers
- Exam (elaborations) • 1 pages • 2023
-
Available in package deal
-
- $10.49
- + learn more
LEGL 2700- test 3 cases, Roessing Questions and Answers
-
UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) Questions And Answers
- Exam (elaborations) • 5 pages • 2024
- Available in package deal
-
- $10.49
- + learn more
UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) 
Questions And Answers 
Macy's v. Martha St ewart and J.C. Penney exclusive agreement to sell some products in 
Macy's store; JCPenney announced selling Martha Stewart products but in a stand-alone store 
inside of JCPenney; this case demonstrates using clear language in contracts and highlights the 
danger in counting on a court to support a technical interpretation 
St. Louis Produce Market v. Hughes Defendant agreed to be paid 14 weeks wort...
-
LEGL 2700- test 3 cases, Roessing Questions And Answers
- Exam (elaborations) • 2 pages • 2024
- Available in package deal
-
- $11.49
- + learn more
LEGL 2700- test 3 cases, Roessing Questions 
And Answers 
Popov v. Hayashi Property rights 
highly valued homerun baseball possession case; ended in a partition ruling- judge split the 
proceeds of the baseball between the 2 men, most of the money went to their lawyers 
Pierson v. Post (NY 1805) One guy tired out fox by chasing and another guy shot and killed it. 
Court favored the one who shot it 
Swift v. Gifford (1877 Mass.) hunting whales, first one holds the whale, not law but custom, 
...
-
LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 1 Cases Questions And Answers
- Exam (elaborations) • 3 pages • 2024
-
Available in package deal
-
- $9.99
- + learn more
LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 1 Cases Questions And Answers 
United States v. Windsor Same sex marriage- landmark civil rights case in which the United States Supreme 
Court held that restricting U.S. federal interpretation of "marriage" and "spouse" to apply only to opposite-sex 
unions, by Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of 
the Fifth Amendment 
Kelo v. City of New London Eminent domain- case decided by the Supreme Court of the Un...
Want to regain your expenses?
-
UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) Questions and Answers | 100% Pass
- Exam (elaborations) • 6 pages • 2024
- Available in package deal
-
- $12.98
- + learn more
Montz v Pilgrim Films & Television, INC. - Correct ️️ Plaintiff pitched idea to NBC and was 
rejected -> NBC created Ghost Hunters -> sued for breach of implied-in-fact contract to pay for 
the use of the reality show concept 
"as a result of cases like Montz, some firms are wary of accepting unsolicited product ideas 
unless a clearly defined contractual relationship exists"
-
LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3 Exam Questions And Answers
- Exam (elaborations) • 40 pages • 2024
-
- $10.49
- + learn more
LEGL 2700 Roessing Test 3 Exam Questions And Answers 
 
 
 
contract - answersa legally enforceable promise or an exchange of promises 
 
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) - answers-covers the sale of goods 
-goods are tangible, movable items of personal property 
-applies to individuals & firms 
-uniform state law 
-Article 2: applies to contracts 
-Section 207: "Battle of Forms" -> Deal still goes through 
 
bilateral contracts - answers-involve a promise for promise exchange ( mutual pro...
How much did you already spend on Stuvia? Imagine there are plenty more of you out there paying for study notes, but this time YOU are the seller. Ka-ching! Discover all about earning on Stuvia