100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) Questions And Answers $10.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) Questions And Answers

 3 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • UGA LEGL 2700
  • Institution
  • UGA LEGL 2700

UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing) Questions And Answers Macy's v. Martha St ewart and J.C. Penney exclusive agreement to sell some products in Macy's store; JCPenney announced selling Martha Stewart products but in a stand-alone store inside of JCPenney; this case demonstrates using...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • October 19, 2024
  • 5
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • UGA LEGL 2700
  • UGA LEGL 2700
avatar-seller
UpperClass
UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing)
Questions And Answers

Macy's v. Martha St ewart and J.C. Penney exclusive agreement to sell some products in

Macy's store; JCPenney announced selling Martha Stewart products but in a stand-alone store

inside of JCPenney; this case demonstrates using clear language in contracts and highlights the

danger in counting on a court to support a technical interpretation




St. Louis Produce Market v. Hughes Defendant agreed to be paid 14 weeks worth of

salary and to return all company owned property

Failure of a condition precedent can excuse a party's performance, even if it is minor

The existence of a minor condition subsequent can cut off a party's obligation to perform




Lucy v Zehmer Drunk farm selling


-Plaintiff would bring it up while they were drinking, Defendant would say no to selling his farm

-Eventually agreed to sell farm when drinking

-Common Law of Britain: intoxication is no defense --> Factual Capacity/Non Competent party




Mills v Wyman (1825) One party promised another to pay for him caring his now

deceased son

, UGA legl 2700 Test 3 Court Cases (Roessing)
Questions And Answers
-Never ends up paying the guy

-Past "Consideration"/ Prior Consideration = no consideration

- Cant sue for him not paying as promised because the Actions took place before any type of

contract was made




Kirksey v Kirksey After Plaintiff's husband died, Defendant offered to put up Plaintiff on

his land. Plaintiff gave up her land and moved to Defendant's property, but approximately two

years later Defendant made Plaintiff leave his property. The plaintiff sued to enforce the promise,

but the court did not find a valid contract. It held that a promise on the condition, "If you will

come down and see me" is not a bargained for exchange for the promisee's "coming down to see"

the promisor. The promise is not sufficiently supported by bargained-for consideration and is not

enforceable




Wright v Newmann Plaintiff is seeking child support from Defendant. Defendant admits

he is the father of Plaintiff's daughter, but has introduced DNA evidence that he is not the father

of Plaintiff's son. However, Defendant is listed on the birth certificate of Plaintiff's son and

Plaintiff's son uses Defendant's surname. In addition, Defendant established a parent-child

relationship with Plaintiff's son. Where a promise of parental support is made and detrimentally

relied upon, it is enforceable under promissory estoppel

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller UpperClass. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67163 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$10.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart