Sam Houston State University
Derniers ajouts au Sam Houston State University. Vous recherchez des notes d'étude à Sam Houston State University? Nous avons de nombreuses notes de cours, guides d'étude et notes d'étude disponibles pour les cours de votre institution.
-
306
-
2
-
22
All courses for Sam Houston State University
-
Anatomy 1
-
Anatomy and Physiology BIOL2404 14
-
ARTS 1303 ARTS1303 2
-
BANA 2372 Business Analysis BANA2372 1
-
BIO 246 1
-
CJ 361 CJ361 1
-
CJ 480 CJ480 1
-
COMS 1361 COMS1361 1
-
COMS 2331 COMS2331 21
-
COMS 2386 COMS2386 2
-
COMS 2390 COMS2390 4
-
COMS 3370 COMS3370 2
-
COMS 3372 COMS3372 16
-
Contemporary Moral Issues 2
-
Courts & Criminal Procedure 1
-
CRIJ 2394 CRIJ 2394 1
-
CRIJ 2394 02 1
-
CRIJ 4332 2
-
Economics 3
-
ENGL 1301 LISH1301 6
-
HIST 1302 1
-
HIST 3377 HIST3377 15
-
History 1301 HIST1301 12
-
Human sexuality 1
-
Introduction to Psychology 20
-
Legal Aspects of CJ CJ 2394 1
-
Managerial Econ 4
-
Managerial Economics 6
-
Managerial Economics Final Review 1
-
MATHS ECON 4357 1
-
MATHS PA1 1
-
Multicultural health HLTH2383 2
-
NUR 1251 NUR 1251 5
-
NURS 1251 1
-
NURS MISC Ch 31 Care of the Child with a Physical and Mental or Cognitive Disorder NURS MISC 2
-
NURSING 4357 1
-
Nursing econ 4357 1
-
PHIL 1301 PHIL1301 4
-
PSYC 3402 PSYC 3402 1
-
SPAN 2312 SPAN2312 1
-
Strategic Managment 2
-
United States History 39
-
Weather and Climate 1
Livres bien-aimés Sam Houston State University
Joseph L. Locke, Ben Wright • ISBN 9781503606715
Dernières notes et résumés Sam Houston State University
The text discusses the appropriate use of authority and expertise when evaluating claims. It emphasizes the importance of skepticism and critical thinking when faced with expert advice. The text also highlights the fallacy of inappropriate appeal to authority and provides several criteria for determining whether an appeal to authority is appropriate or not. 
 
The text further explains the concept of an appropriate domain of expertise, stating that certain subjective areas like ethics and aesthe...
- Notes de cours
- • 5 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 2 sur 5 pages
The text discusses the appropriate use of authority and expertise when evaluating claims. It emphasizes the importance of skepticism and critical thinking when faced with expert advice. The text also highlights the fallacy of inappropriate appeal to authority and provides several criteria for determining whether an appeal to authority is appropriate or not. 
 
The text further explains the concept of an appropriate domain of expertise, stating that certain subjective areas like ethics and aesthe...
Outline 
Case #1: “Beyond Here There Be” 
Single Probability 
 Conjoined Probabilities 
 Case #2: “Buzzer Beater” 
Disjunctive Possibilities 
Computing Probabilities 
Case #3: Graduation Anxiety
- Notes de cours
- • 3 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 1 sur 3 pages
Outline 
Case #1: “Beyond Here There Be” 
Single Probability 
 Conjoined Probabilities 
 Case #2: “Buzzer Beater” 
Disjunctive Possibilities 
Computing Probabilities 
Case #3: Graduation Anxiety
Unit #11: Scientific Method 
- Deductivism and inductivism are methods used in the scientific method. 
- Deductivism involves deriving scientific laws through deductive methods from metaphysical truths. 
- Examples of deductivism include Aristotle deducing the shape of the solar system and Hippocrates deducing the causes of mental disorders. 
- Inductivism involves generating scientific laws through inductive reasoning from observations or data. 
- Examples of inductivism include Johannes Kepler...
- Notes de cours
- • 6 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 2 sur 6 pages
Unit #11: Scientific Method 
- Deductivism and inductivism are methods used in the scientific method. 
- Deductivism involves deriving scientific laws through deductive methods from metaphysical truths. 
- Examples of deductivism include Aristotle deducing the shape of the solar system and Hippocrates deducing the causes of mental disorders. 
- Inductivism involves generating scientific laws through inductive reasoning from observations or data. 
- Examples of inductivism include Johannes Kepler...
The third exam for PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking, taught by Thomas J. Brommage, will cover various topics related to critical thinking. Inductive arguments are claims about the world that provide evidence for why we should believe or act according to the claim. On the other hand, abductive arguments offer proposed explanations for a set of facts or evidence. Induction by enumeration involves generalizing from a set of instances describing properties or relations. Reductio ad absurdum argues again...
- Notes de cours
- • 4 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 1 sur 4 pages
The third exam for PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking, taught by Thomas J. Brommage, will cover various topics related to critical thinking. Inductive arguments are claims about the world that provide evidence for why we should believe or act according to the claim. On the other hand, abductive arguments offer proposed explanations for a set of facts or evidence. Induction by enumeration involves generalizing from a set of instances describing properties or relations. Reductio ad absurdum argues again...
Exam #5: Format & Review 
PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking Thomas J. Brommage Fall 2023 
 
The following concepts are important for the upcoming exam: 
 
1. Subjectivity: While art judgments are subjective, they are not entirely subjective. Beauty is not solely in the "eye of the beholder." 
 
2. Factual vs. Normative Judgments: Aesthetic and ethical judgments are normative, but they use different values. Ethical judgments involve moral blame and praise. 
 
3. Authority/Expertise and Art: Authorit...
- Notes de cours
- • 5 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 2 sur 5 pages
Exam #5: Format & Review 
PHIL 2303: Critical Thinking Thomas J. Brommage Fall 2023 
 
The following concepts are important for the upcoming exam: 
 
1. Subjectivity: While art judgments are subjective, they are not entirely subjective. Beauty is not solely in the "eye of the beholder." 
 
2. Factual vs. Normative Judgments: Aesthetic and ethical judgments are normative, but they use different values. Ethical judgments involve moral blame and praise. 
 
3. Authority/Expertise and Art: Authorit...
Unit #12: Art Inquiry 
This unit focuses on aesthetic judgments, privacy, subjectivity, artistic medium, interpretive judgments, meaning, and justifying interpretive judgments. Aesthetic judgments are evaluative or interpretive, expressing values like beauty, elegance, complexity, vision, and influence. While subjective impressions play a role, authority/expertise is not as important in aesthetics. Artistic medium varies, and different criteria are used for assessment. The exercise involves cons...
- Notes de cours
- • 2 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 1 sur 2 pages
Unit #12: Art Inquiry 
This unit focuses on aesthetic judgments, privacy, subjectivity, artistic medium, interpretive judgments, meaning, and justifying interpretive judgments. Aesthetic judgments are evaluative or interpretive, expressing values like beauty, elegance, complexity, vision, and influence. While subjective impressions play a role, authority/expertise is not as important in aesthetics. Artistic medium varies, and different criteria are used for assessment. The exercise involves cons...
Causal explanations are different from inductive arguments as they provide explanations rather than conclusions. There are two types of explanations: reason explanations and causal explanations. Reason explanations provide a purpose or goal, while causal explanations explain what caused something to happen. When evaluating causal explanations, it is important to consider the difference between causation and correlation. A fallacy of causal reasoning is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, which fails to d...
- Notes de cours
- • 2 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 1 sur 2 pages
Causal explanations are different from inductive arguments as they provide explanations rather than conclusions. There are two types of explanations: reason explanations and causal explanations. Reason explanations provide a purpose or goal, while causal explanations explain what caused something to happen. When evaluating causal explanations, it is important to consider the difference between causation and correlation. A fallacy of causal reasoning is Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc, which fails to d...
Arguments by Analogy are based on the idea that if a certain property or relation exists between two things (A and B), it will also exist between two other things (C and D) that share a similarity with A. Analogies are often expressed as A : B :: C : D. There are different types of analogical arguments, including Precedent Analogies that rely on similarities in circumstances, Causal Analogies that predict future events based on previous ones, and Illustrative Analogies that provide comparisons t...
- Notes de cours
- • 2 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 1 sur 2 pages
Arguments by Analogy are based on the idea that if a certain property or relation exists between two things (A and B), it will also exist between two other things (C and D) that share a similarity with A. Analogies are often expressed as A : B :: C : D. There are different types of analogical arguments, including Precedent Analogies that rely on similarities in circumstances, Causal Analogies that predict future events based on previous ones, and Illustrative Analogies that provide comparisons t...
There are four types of inductive arguments: Induction by Enumeration, Reductio Ad Absurdum, Statistical Induction, and Higher-level Induction. Induction by Enumeration argues from specific instances to a generalization. Reductio Ad Absurdum argues against a position by showing it leads to absurd outcomes. Statistical Induction infers generalizations based on the probability of a thing happening. Higher-level Induction uses more general inferences to overrule lower-level ones. Examples are provi...
- Notes de cours
- • 2 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 1 sur 2 pages
There are four types of inductive arguments: Induction by Enumeration, Reductio Ad Absurdum, Statistical Induction, and Higher-level Induction. Induction by Enumeration argues from specific instances to a generalization. Reductio Ad Absurdum argues against a position by showing it leads to absurd outcomes. Statistical Induction infers generalizations based on the probability of a thing happening. Higher-level Induction uses more general inferences to overrule lower-level ones. Examples are provi...
This text provides a review of concepts that may be encountered in Exam 2. It discusses the premise as a set of statements that justify the conclusion and the conclusion as the main point of the argument. Arguments are collections of statements used to justify a specific point, and sub-arguments can have multiple conclusions, serving as premises for larger arguments. The principle of charity suggests choosing the most favorable interpretation of an argument. Prima facie judgments are tentative a...
- Notes de cours
- • 4 pages's •
-
Sam Houston State University•PHIL 2303
Aperçu 1 sur 4 pages
This text provides a review of concepts that may be encountered in Exam 2. It discusses the premise as a set of statements that justify the conclusion and the conclusion as the main point of the argument. Arguments are collections of statements used to justify a specific point, and sub-arguments can have multiple conclusions, serving as premises for larger arguments. The principle of charity suggests choosing the most favorable interpretation of an argument. Prima facie judgments are tentative a...