Yonaty v mincolla - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

JOMC 486 Exam 1 Case Studies with Questions and Answers Nebraska v. Drahota (2010) ANSWER - Darren J. Drahota was convicted of a breach of the peace based on two emails he sent to William Avery, his former political science professor and a candidate for the State Legislature. These emails were full of provocative and insulting rhetoric. Drahota suggested that Avery was a traitor and that he sympathized with Al Qaeda, a terrorist organization. - The court said Drahota's emails were not figh...

Nebraska v. Drahota (2010) - ANSWER-- Darren J. Drahota was convicted of a breach of the peace based on two emails he sent to William Avery, his former political science professor and a candidate for the State Legislature. These emails were full of provocative and insulting rhetoric. Drahota suggested that Avery was a traitor and that he sympathized with Al Qaeda, a terrorist organization. - The court said Drahota's emails were not fighting words because the context of Drahota's speech was a...

JOMC 486 Questions With 100% Correct Answers Virginia v. Black involved two incidents of cross burning, one by Barry Black and the other by Richard Elliott and Jonathan O'Mara. Which of the following best describes the two incidents? Black burned a cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally, and Elliott and O'Mara burned a cross in a neighbor's yard. The plurality opinion in Virginia v. Black, written by Justice O'Connor, found the Virginia statute on cross burning unconstitutional because The prim...

JOMC 486 Questions With 100% Correct Answers Virginia v. Black involved two incidents of cross burning, one by Barry Black and the other by Richard Elliott and Jonathan O'Mara. Which of the following best describes the two incidents? Black burned a cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally, and Elliott and O'Mara burned a cross in a neighbor's yard. The plurality opinion in Virginia v. Black, written by Justice O'Connor, found the Virginia statute on cross burning unconstitutional because The prim...

JOMC 486 Questions With 100% Correct Answers Virginia v. Black involved two incidents of cross burning, one by Barry Black and the other by Richard Elliott and Jonathan O'Mara. Which of the following best describes the two incidents? Black burned a cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally, and Elliott and O'Mara burned a cross in a neighbor's yard. The plurality opinion in Virginia v. Black, written by Justice O'Connor, found the Virginia statute on cross burning unconstitutional because The prim...

JOMC 486 Test 1 Solved 100% Correct!! Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism law which prohibited (brandenburg vs. ohio) advocacy of violence to bring about industrial or political reform. Brandenburg was filmed at a rally of (brandenburg vs. ohio) the Ku Klux Klan. In the 1927 Whitney v. California decision, the U.S. Supreme Court had said a criminal syndicalism statute similar to Ohio's was (brandenburg vs. ohio) constitutional. According to the Supreme Court, ...

Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism law which prohibited (brandenburg vs. ohio) - ANSWER advocacy of violence to bring about industrial or political reform. Brandenburg was filmed at a rally of (brandenburg vs. ohio) - ANSWER the Ku Klux Klan. In the 1927 Whitney v. California decision, the U.S. Supreme Court had said a criminal syndicalism statute similar to Ohio's was (brandenburg vs. ohio) - ANSWER constitutional. According to the Supreme Court, advocating ...

JOMC 486 Questions With 100% Correct Answers Virginia v. Black involved two incidents of cross burning, one by Barry Black and the other by Richard Elliott and Jonathan O'Mara. Which of the following best describes the two incidents? Black burned a cross at a Ku Klux Klan rally, and Elliott and O'Mara burned a cross in a neighbor's yard. The plurality opinion in Virginia v. Black, written by Justice O'Connor, found the Virginia statute on cross burning unconstitutional because The prim...

JOMC 486 Test 1 Solved 100% Correct!! Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism law which prohibited (brandenburg vs. ohio) advocacy of violence to bring about industrial or political reform. Brandenburg was filmed at a rally of (brandenburg vs. ohio) the Ku Klux Klan. In the 1927 Whitney v. California decision, the U.S. Supreme Court had said a criminal syndicalism statute similar to Ohio's was (brandenburg vs. ohio) constitutional. According to the Supreme Court, ...

In the New York Times v. United States case, Justices Byron White and Thurgood Marshall said they were reluctant to impose a prior restraint on a newspaper in the absence of - ANSWER A statute passed by Congress authorizing the government to seek a prior restraint. The Pentagon Papers, which were at issue in the New York Times v. United States Supreme Court decision, were - ANSWER A top secret study of how the nation became embroiled in the Vietnam War. When Scottie Pippen sued NBC Univers...