Rhode island vs innis - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Katz vs Ohio : Reasonable Expectation of Privacy. Commonwealth vs Duncan : Taking suspect under control for Show ups and Stand ups are seizures. Commonwealth vs McCloskey : Miranda warnings not needed for basic ID or biographical information. Rhode Island vs Innis : Interrogations are words, questions or actions where the answers might make a suspect incriminate themselves. However, "Shame if a kid found a gun" is not an interrogation.

Katz vs Ohio Reasonable Expectation of Privacy. Commonwealth vs Duncan Taking suspect under control for Show ups and Stand ups are seizures. Commonwealth vs McCloskey Miranda warnings not needed for basic ID or biographical information. Rhode Island vs Innis Interrogations are words, questions or actions where the answers might make a suspect incriminate themselves. However, "Shame if a kid found a gun" is not an interrogation. Mapp vs Ohio Exclusionary Rule, "Fruits from the forb...

MPOETC CASE LAW Questions And Answers With Verified Solutions Latest Updated 2024

What court case allowed "Stop & Frisk"? - Answer- Terry vs. Ohio What justification is needed for a Stop & Frisk? - Answer- Reasonable suspicion What is the scope of Search for a stop & frisk? - Answer- Quick seizure & limited search for contraband. What is the Plain Feel rule? - Answer- You must be able to tell it's contraband from a pat-down/ if you can it gives you PC to search. What are the big distinctions in a Stop & Frisk? - Answer- Stop (less) vs. Arrest (greater) Frisk (...