Miranda v arizona - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

2024 WSC Full Set – Pocketpwaa (Definitions from Pocketpwaa - Study Guide Not to be used as a sole source, just a review) Rated 100% Correct Diorama A taxidermied subject within its historical environment. Established by Carl Akeley in 1890, and requires research from Botanists, Zoologists, Anthropoligists, etc. Aaron Delehanty A person specializing in creating dioramas, starting since he was in 6th grade. Worked on a Hemedu civilization diorama with the Cyrus Hall of China as well as ...

CLEET Cert Test Review 2024 Questions and Answers A crime may be defined as... -Answer-A public offense, forbidden, which the government sanctions. A suspect may invoke his/her right to counsel or right to remain silent when? -Answer-At any time during the investigation. A self incriminatory statement by a subject, falling short of a complete acknowledgement of guilt is known as what? -Answer-Admission Ted broke into Sally's at 0730 while Sally was sleeping. While in the apartment, Ted i...

Miranda vs. Arizona - Answer- The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - Answer- Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - Answer- Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is...

Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Louisiana POST Study Guide (Answered 100% Correctly) Latest Miranda vs. Arizona The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against selfincrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio Allowed the police to stop and se...

Utah SFO Final Questions and Answers 100% Pass When should you get a written statement (4 reasons) -Reluctant -Key witness -Will not be able to testify -May change statement in court Brown V. Mississippi 1936 Use of force in obtaining a confession will make the confession inadmissible in court 4 behavioral signs of addiction Neglecting responsibilities -Unexplained reasons for money -Engaging in suspicious behavior -Taking unnecessary risks Legal Search Items -Weapons -Fruits of crime -Instru...

Miranda vs. Arizona - CORRECT ANS The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self-incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - CORRECT ANS Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - CORRECT ANS Allowed the police to stop and search a suspect if he has reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is c...

When should you get a written statement (4 reasons) correct answer: -Reluctant -Key witness -Will not be able to testify -May change statement in court Brown V. Mississippi 1936 correct answer: Use of force in obtaining a confession will make the confession inadmissible in court 4 behavioral signs of addiction correct answer: Neglecting responsibilities -Unexplained reasons for money -Engaging in suspicious behavior -Taking unnecessary risks Legal Search Items correct answe...

UTAH SFO COMPLETE FINAL EXAM 2023 1. When should you get a written statement (4 reasons): -Reluctant -Key witness -Will not be able to testify -May change statement in court 2. Brown V. Mississippi 1936: Use of force in obtaining a confession will make the confession inadmissible in court 3. 4 behavioral signs of addiction: Neglecting responsibilities -Unexplained reasons for money -Engaging in suspicious behavior -Taking unnecessary risks 4. Legal Search Items: -Weapons -Fruits of cr...

Tort - CORRECT ANS A private or civil wrong or injury, other than a breach of contract. Preponderance of evidence - CORRECT ANS The amount of information needed to decide in favor of a party in a civil suit. It consists of more than fifty percent of the believable evidence in favor of the party's suit or defense. One more fact than the other party has established. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt - CORRECT ANS The amount of information needed to convict a person of a crime. It is enough e...

cleet progress exam 1 reserve training questions and answers municipal court not of record non-lawyer -Answer-non-lawyer, fines up to $50, no Jail sentences, juvenile jurisdiction over only traffic violations. court not of record no lawyer -Answer-a court in which proceedings are not required to be recorded, the judge is a lawyer, can fine up to $200, may give 30 days in jail, may not jail juveniles. court of record -Answer-keeps an exact account of what goes on at trial, lawyer judge, m...

Missouri POST Test Study Guide Question and Answers Verified. Tort - A private or civil wrong or injury, other than a breach of contract. Preponderance of evidence - The amount of information needed to decide in favor of a party in a civil suit. It consists of more than fifty percent of the believable evidence in favor of the party's suit or defense. One more fact than the other party has established. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt - The amount of information needed to convict a person o...