Browne v dunn - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Qld Bar Exam - Ethics Cases and Questions And Answers Bale and Anor v Mills Breach of rule in Browne v Dunn - failing to put matters to witness in cross-examination - consequences Facts: Bale were lawyer for Mills. Bale settled his PI case for Mills. Mills alleged he was pressured and given false info which led him to settle his PI claim. Bale was not cross-examined in relation to certain matters and was given no opportunity to explain his actions - Breach of rule in Browne v Dunn. He...

QLD BAR EXAM PRACTICE SETS EXAM QUESTIONS AND REVISED CORRECT ANSWERS What is the exam looking for? - ANSWER : a) identify the general principle behind the ethical/ bar rule and the reason for it; b) answer the question asked and identify any legislative provision or rule applicable; c) apply the content of the ethical/ Bar rule (or at least to state its key components) in addition to stating the rule; and d) identify where an active role in pursuing an ethical course is requ...

Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof - Evidentiary burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be able to prove it with evidence. Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to a the standard, or level of proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD). Judge's Discretion - A judge has a discretion to exclude ev...

Qld Bar Exam - Evidence Exam Questions And Answers Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof - ANS Evidential burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be able to prove it with evidence. Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to a the standard, or level of proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD). Jud...

Qld Bar Exam - Evidence Questions And Answers Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof - Evidentiary burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be able to prove it with evidence. Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to the standard, or level of proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD). Judge's Discret...

2024 Qld Bar Exam - Ethics With Questions And Correct Answers What is the exam looking for? - -a) identify the general principle behind the ethical/ bar rule and the reason for it; b) answer the question asked and identify any legislative provision or rule applicable; c) apply the content of the ethical/ Bar rule (or at least to state its key components) in addition to stating the rule; and d) identify where an active role in pursuing an ethical course is required of the barrister whethe...

Legal Burden vs Evidentiary Burden of proof - Answer-Evidentiary burden: BRING EVIDENCE. The burden of a party to bring evidence that there is sufficient evidence to raise an issue as the existence of a FII. The party who is making a claim or assertion must be able to prove it with evidence. Legal burden: PROVE THE EVIDENCE to a the standard, or level of proof a party has an obligation to reach to prove a FII (e.g. Crown as to BRD). Judge's Discretion - Answer-A judge has a discretion to e...

Qld Bar Exam - Evidence Questions & Answers 2024 ( A+ GRADED 100% VERIFIED)

Qld Bar Exam – Ethics Questions With Verified Answers What is the exam looking for? - answera) identify the general principle behind the ethical/ bar rule and the reason for it; b) answer the question asked and identify any legislative provision or rule applicable; c) apply the content of the ethical/ Bar rule (or at least to state its key components) in addition to stating the rule; and d) identify where an active role in pursuing an ethical course is required of the barrister whether ...

Contents Vicarious liability 10 Century Insurance Co Ltd v Northern Ireland Road Transport Board [1942] AC 509 10 Deatons Pty Ltd v Flew (1949) 79 CLR 370 10 The Tort of Trespass 10 Stanley v Powell [1891] 1 QB 86 10 Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco Co [1957] 2 QB 334 11 Rixon v Star City Pty Ltd [2001] 53 NSWLR 98 11 Defences to the Tort of Trespass 11 Southwark LBC v Williams [1971] Ch 734 11 The Tort of Nuisance 11 Silservice v Supreme Bread Pty Ltd (1949) 50 SR (NSW) 207 11 The Tort of ...