Aguilar v texas Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Louisiana Post One Exam Questions and Answers probable cause - Answer️️ - more than bare suspicion. it exist when the facts and circumstances within the officers knowledge and of which they had reasonable trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves reasonable suspicion - Answer️️ - less demanding standard than probable cause not only in the same sense that reasonable suspicion can be established with information that is different in quantity and content that is required to...

Louisiana Post One Exam Questions and Answers probable cause - Answer️️ - more than bare suspicion. it exist when the facts and circumstances within the officers knowledge and of which they had reasonable trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves reasonable suspicion - Answer️️ - less demanding standard than probable cause not only in the same sense that reasonable suspicion can be established with information that is different in quantity and content that is required to...

A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant issued by him or her is not valid. - CORRECT ANSWER-Coolidge v. New Hampshire The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the time the warrant is issued. Also see, exclusionary ru...

Legal cases Louisiana post Exam Questions and Answers A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant issued by him or her is not valid. - Answer ️️ -Coolidge v. New Hampshire The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the ...

Aguilar v. Texas correct answer: Incorporated warrant requirements Boyd v. United States correct answer: Emphasizes: Search and Seizure Background: A search on imports was conducted to prove that fees were not paid. Ruling: The Court ruled held that "a search and seizure [was] equivalent [to] a compulsory production of a man's private papers" and that the search was "an 'unreasonable search and seizure' within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Chapman v. California correct ans...

Legal Aspects Latest Update 100% Pass Probable Cause more than a bare suspicion. When the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge and of which they had reasonable trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves to warrant a man of reasonable caution in the belief that an offense has been or is being committed. 50% certainty. Level of certainty required to make an arrest. Reasonable Suspicion A less demanding standard that probable cause not only in the sense that reasonable...

ARREST, SEARCH, SEIZURE EXAM QUESTIONS WITH COMPLETE SOLUTIONS The court will examine the "____________ _____ _______ _____________" surrounding the seizure or detention to determine if there were sufficient facts and circumstances present to satisfy the Fourth Amendment. totality of the circumstances Only the information known to the officer at the time of the ________ or search will be considered by the court - any evidence found after the arrest or during the search will not be _______...

Louisiana Post One Exam Questions and Answers probable cause - Answer️️ - more than bare suspicion. it exist when the facts and circumstances within the officers knowledge and of which they had reasonable trustworthy information are sufficient in themselves reasonable suspicion - Answer️️ - less demanding standard than probable cause not only in the same sense that reasonable suspicion can be established with information that is different in quantity and content that is required to...

Legal cases Louisiana post latest update graded A A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant issued by him or her is not valid. Coolidge v. New Hampshire The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the time the warrant is issu...

Legal cases Louisiana post Exam Questions and Answers A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant issued by him or her is not valid. - Answer ️️ -Coolidge v. New Hampshire The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the ...