Mapp v ohio - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Weeks v. US (1914) - Answer Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) - Answer "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion - Answer a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experi...

10 - WCJC 114 Arrest Search & Seizure Question and answers 100% correct 2024/2025 10 - WCJC 114 Arrest Search & Seizure "Fruits of the Poisonous Tree" refers to the: -Writ of Habeas Corpus -Exclusionary Rule -Warrantless Arrest -Orange Growers -Open Fields Doctrine - correct answer Exclusionary Rule "Open Fields" searches according to common law and the U.S. Supreme Court are exempt from the 4th Amendment protection except for an open area surrounding a dwelling. This a...

Mapp v. Ohio - correct answer federal court exclusionary rule to the states Terry v. Ohio - correct answer Creates stop and frisk Nix v. Williams - correct answer inevitable discovery Katz v. US - correct answer reasonable expectation of privacy Who investigates aliens being smuggled or trafficked or aliens engaged in narcotics trafficking, bulk cash smuggling production of counterfeit ID documentation or nation security and terrorism - correct answer Homeland Security Special Agents...

What speed constitutes a high speed chase? - Answer-Officer safety and civilian safety in danger Two guys agree to commit a crime and get caught later? - Answer-Conspiracy When applying a tourniquet, where and what do you write? - Answer-Time on the forehead What color of the spectrum do police officers work in? - Answer-Yellow What is the speed limit for an urban area? - Answer-35 MPH A guy robs an officers house, what shouldn't you do? - Answer-Chase him using lethal force. ...

100% Solved Weeks v. US (1914) Exclusionary rule - warrantless seizure of items from private residence violates 4th Amendment Terry v. Ohio (1968) "Stop and Frisk" police may: - stop a person if they have reasonable suspicion that the person committed, or is about to commit, a crime - frisk the suspect for weapons if they have reasonable suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous Reasonable Suspicion a suspicion based on specific facts, training, and experience; less than ...

POST EXAM PRACTICE TEST Subjects of an interrogation are witnesses and victims who are willing to provide police with information they possess about a matter under investigation F Simple Robbery is the taking of anything of value belonging to another form the person of another by the use of force or intimidation while armed with a firearm F A batter "under the color of law" can result in a civil rights lawsuit. T Livor Mortis is the stiffening of muscles are death due to che...

MPOETC Cert Exam Actual Quiz with Verified Answers (Graded A) 1 / 41 1. Police powers require 1. Discretion what 3 things? (Foley v. 2. Fairness Connelie) 2. What are the 4 consequences of unlawful searches or seizures? 3. What are the sources of legal authority that define police's power to search and seize? 4. What does the 4th Amendment state? 5. What 4 areas are protected under the 4th amendment? 6. "Persons" protected under the 4th amendment are also covered in what other...

Criminal Justice NOCTI, Criminal Justice NOCTISubpoena - correct answer a legal document ordering a person to testify in a court of law as a witness Actus Reus - correct answer The actual criminal act Mens Rea - correct answer legal phrase used to describe the mental state a person must have been in while committing a crime for it to be intentional Loops - correct answer the most common fingerprint Chain of Custody - correct answer a process used to maintain and document the chr...

Louisiana POST Study Guide with complete solutions |Graded A| 42 Pages Miranda vs. Arizona - Answer️️ -The supreme court case in which the court held that criminal suspects must be informed of their right to consult with an attorney and of their right against self- incrimination prior to questioning by police. Mapp v. Ohio - Answer️️ -Evidence illegally gathered by the police may not be used in a criminal trial Terry vs. Ohio - Answer️️ -Allowed the police to stop and search a...