Miranda versus arizona - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

CRJ325 A CRJ 325 Miranda Rule versus an Exception CRJ 325 Miranda Rule versus an Exception The Miranda v Arizona ruling in 1966, law enforcement could question possible suspects without their having legal counsel present. They could bully potential suspects, trick them, and do whatever else they thought was necessary to determine potential suspects' involvement in a crime. The Miranda ruling protects people by allowing them to have legal counsel present when questioned by law enforcement...

1.)Can State money be used to fund a religious school? - answer-NO-They can't give money to the promotion of religious beliefs. 2.)Is it ok for the Federal Government to imprison people for suspicion of being a threat according to the ruling in Korematsu v. United States? - answer-In 1988 the Federal Gov. admitted that the wartime relocation had been both unnecessary and unjust. Congress voted to pay 20,000$ to each living internee. 3.)Can congress make a law about how to practice religio...

• I can identify areas of the Constitution that are influenced by the enlightenment. -ANSWER The Constitution makes justice more important than liberty. more concerned with controlling rather than expressing the popular will. Property rights republicanism separation of powers • I can identify areas of the Bill of Rights that are influenced by the enlightenment -ANSWER natural rights and procedural rights.1st amendment • I can list several weaknesses of the Articles of Confederations....

CRJ325 A CRJ 325 Miranda Rule versus an Exception CRJ 325 Miranda Rule versus an Exception The Miranda v Arizona ruling in 1966, law enforcement could question possible suspects without their having legal counsel present. They could bully potential suspects, trick them, and do whatever else they thought was necessary to determine potential suspects' involvement in a crime. The Miranda ruling protects people by allowing them to have legal counsel present when questioned by law enforcement...

CRJ325 A CRJ 325 Miranda Rule versus an Exception CRJ 325 Miranda Rule versus an Exception The Miranda v Arizona ruling in 1966, law enforcement could question possible suspects without their having legal counsel present. They could bully potential suspects, trick them, and do whatever else they thought was necessary to determine potential suspects' involvement in a crime. The Miranda ruling protects people by allowing them to have legal counsel present when questioned by law enforcement...