Minnesota post exam - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

Katz v. United States - correct answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - correct answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - correct answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resi...

2025 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide(Post Exam)With Correct Answers!

2024 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide(Post Exam)With Correct Answers!!

Katz v. United States Correct Answer: Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio Correct Answer: exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor Correct Answer: determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active re...

2024 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide(Post Exam) Answered 100% Correctly Katz v. United States Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immedi...

2024 Minnesota Post Exam Study Guide (Post Exam) With Correct Answers!! Katz v. United States - -Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio - -exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor - -determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an im...

Katz v. United States Correct Answer Electronic surveillance; the court held that they must have a warrant to tap your phone or video record you Mapp v. Ohio Correct Answer exclusionary rule Graham v. Connor Correct Answer determined that the reasonableness of a particular use of force must be judged from the perspective of how a reasonable officer on the scene would respond, rather than from the 20/20 perspective of hindsight. 1. Severity 2. Pose an immediate threat 3. Active resistance o...