Brandenburg v ohio - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

JOMC 486 Midterm Cases with Questions and Answers Levels of Scrutiny ANSWER 1. Strict scrutiny: meaning the government must show the law or regulation fritters a compelling governmental interest and is narrowly tailored for achieving that interest. 2. Intermediate scrutiny: meaning the government must show the law or regulation serves a substantial governmental interest and directly advances that interest. 3. The Rational-Basis test: meaning the law or regulation serves a legitimate governm...

Brandenburg was convicted under the Ohio Criminal Syndicalism law which prohibited (brandenburg vs. ohio) - advocacy of violence to bring about industrial or political reform. Brandenburg was filmed at a rally of (brandenburg vs. ohio) - the Ku Klux Klan. In the 1927 Whitney v. California decision, the U.S. Supreme Court had said a criminal syndicalism statute similar to Ohio's was (brandenburg vs. ohio) - constitutional. According to the Supreme Court, advocating violent means to effect p...

Schenck v. U.S. (1919) - CORRECT ANSWER-*threats to national security* FACTS: During World War I, Schenck mailed circulars to draftees. The circulars suggested that the draft was a monstrous wrong motivated by the capitalist system. The circulars urged "Do not submit to intimidation" but advised only peaceful action such as petitioning to repeal the Conscription Act. Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate the Espionage Act by attempting to cause insubordination in the military...

JOUR303 Midterm Guide Exam Questions And Answers 4-Step Process for Determining What a Law Is 1. Read the law 2. Look at the precedent 3. Look at the lawmakers 4. Look at the history of the times If the 1st Amendment protects anything it protects ________________. political speech 6 Rationales for Abridging the 1st Amendment 1. "Yes, but..." 2. "No, not protected at all" (i.e. criminal speech, pornographic speech) 3. "Somewhat" (i.e. commercial speech, broadcast speech) ...

Practice Review for MIS 3320 - Final Exam Q&A 100% Correct 2024/2025 Schenck v. U.S. (1919) - CORRECT ANSWER-*threats to national security* FACTS: During World War I, Schenck mailed circulars to draftees. The circulars suggested that the draft was a monstrous wrong motivated by the capitalist system. The circulars urged "Do not submit to intimidation" but advised only peaceful action such as petitioning to repeal the Conscription Act. Schenck was charged with conspiracy to violate ...

Florida Civics Literacy final exam 2024/2025 questions with answers 100% In the United States, how are conflicts between state laws and federal laws generally resolved? A. The conflict must be resolved by the U.S. attorney general. B. The conflict must be resolved by a national referendum. C. The conflict must be resolved using the Supremacy Clause. D. The conflict must be resolved using the Tenth Amendment. - ANSWERS C .Which form of government is based on popular sovereignty? ...

JOUR303 Midterm Guide Exam Questions And Answer 4-Step Process for Determining What a Law Is 1. Read the law 2. Look at the precedent 3. Look at the lawmakers 4. Look at the history of the times If the 1st Amendment protects anything it protects ________________. political speech 6 Rationales for Abridging the 1st Amendment 1. "Yes, but..." 2. "No, not protected at all" (i.e. criminal speech, pornographic speech) 3. "Somewhat" (i.e. commercial speech, broadcast speech) 4....

JOUR303 Midterm Guide Exam Questions And Answer 4-Step Process for Determining What a Law Is 1. Read the law 2. Look at the precedent 3. Look at the lawmakers 4. Look at the history of the times If the 1st Amendment protects anything it protects ________________. political speech 6 Rationales for Abridging the 1st Amendment 1. "Yes, but..." 2. "No, not protected at all" (i.e. criminal speech, pornographic speech) 3. "Somewhat" (i.e. commercial speech, broadcast speech) 4....

JOUR303 Midterm Guide Exam Questions And Answer 4-Step Process for Determining What a Law Is 1. Read the law 2. Look at the precedent 3. Look at the lawmakers 4. Look at the history of the times If the 1st Amendment protects anything it protects ________________. political speech 6 Rationales for Abridging the 1st Amendment 1. "Yes, but..." 2. "No, not protected at all" (i.e. criminal speech, pornographic speech) 3. "Somewhat" (i.e. commercial speech, broadcast speech) 4....

Florida Civics Literacy final exam 2024/2025 questions with answers 100% In the United States, how are conflicts between state laws and federal laws generally resolved? A. The conflict must be resolved by the U.S. attorney general. B. The conflict must be resolved by a national referendum. C. The conflict must be resolved using the Supremacy Clause. D. The conflict must be resolved using the Tenth Amendment. - ANSWERS C .Which form of government is based on popular sovereignty? ...