Rule of b’s - Study guides, Class notes & Summaries

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the CIV3701 Assignment 1 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024.QUESTION 1 X has a claim against Z in the amount of R600 000 based on breach of contract which occurred in Cape Town. X is an incola of Cape Town and Z is an incola of Pretoria. With these facts in mind, answer the following questions. Give full reasons for your answers. (a) Explain why it will be inappropriate for X to use an ordinary application to institute proceedings aga...

QUESTION 1 X has a claim against Z in the amount of R600 000 based on breach of contract which occurred in Cape Town. X is an incola of Cape Town and Z is an incola of Pretoria. With these facts in mind, answer the following questions. Give full reasons for your answers. (a) Explain why it will be inappropriate for X to use an ordinary application to institute proceedings against Z. (2) (b) Explain why X can institute proceedings against Z in the Cape Town High Court. (2) (c) Would your answer t...

This document contains workings, explanations and solutions to the CIV3701 Assignment 1 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 QUESTION 1 X has a claim against Z in the amount of R600 000 based on breach of contract which occurred in Cape Town. X is an incola of Cape Town and Z is an incola of Pretoria. With these facts in mind, answer the following questions. Give full reasons for your answers. (a) Explain why it will be inappropriate for X to use an ordinary application to institute proceedings ag...

CIV3701 Assignment 1 (QUALITY ANSWERS) Semester 2 2024 QUESTION 1 X has a claim against Z in the amount of R600 000 based on breach of contract which occurred in Cape Town. X is an incola of Cape Town and Z is an incola of Pretoria. With these facts in mind, answer the following questions. Give full reasons for your answers. (a) Explain why it will be inappropriate for X to use an ordinary application to institute proceedings against Z. (2) (b) Explain why X can institute proceedings against Z ...

NOTE TO READER: These notes were created for the 22/23 semester of the LPC at BPP and using these alone I got a distinction grade. They are a compilation of lecture notes, SGS solutions, practice/mock/sample papers and previous student’s legacy notes. If you wish to use them, I would recommend using them as a skeleton as you go along the course and supplementing/cross-checking with the content you learn. These are by no means exhaustive and some areas may be missing and/or lacking. Regard...

Solution manual for Canadian Income Taxation 20222023 25th Edition by William Buckwold, Joan Kitunen, Matthew Roman CHAPTER 1 TAXATION― ITS ROLE IN BUSINESS DECISION MAKING Review Questions 1. If income tax is imposed after profits have been determined, why is taxation relevant to business decision making? 2. Most business decisions involve the evaluation of alternative courses of action. For example, a marketing manager may be responsible for choosing a strategy for establishing ...

LAW OF CONTRACT NOTES: Contract as an agreement intended to create enforceable obligations A contract is an agreement between two or more parties. The extra ingredient that distinguishes contracts from non-binding agreements is a serious intention to create legally enforceable obligations (animus contrahendi). The absence of an animus contrahendi explains why ‘gentlemen’s agreements’ are not enforceable as contracts. Legally binding agreements that are not contracts: The ...

CPR3701 Previous Assignment Q and A 2022 -2017. Previous Assignment Q & A 2022-2017 compilation CPR3701 7 ASSIGNMENT 03 and no individual or general answers will be provided to students. 1. A is arrested on a charge of theft involving funds in the company that she works for, namely, Digital Incryption. The matter is brought to court whereupon the prosecutor, P, decides to ‘drop’ the charges against A. (a) Briefly discuss the process, circumstances and the consequences of the withdr...

LEV Notes Law of Evidence (University of South Africa) lOMoARcPSD| WITNESSES 2 aspects of oral evidence: 1. COMPETENCE OF WITNESS TO TESTIFY Whether person has mental capacity to testify – if not, they are not competent to testify & court cannot hear their evidence under any circumstances Note the diff btw admissibility and competence: - Admissibility = evidence of a person who is already a competent witness - Competence = focuses on the person Parties cannot consent to admission o...

Succession Succession: - This aspect of law deals with what happens to an estate (the assets you leave behind) after you pass away. - Estate = the assets, obligations, liabilities, debts, etc. that you leave behind. - Inheritance = what is left once all the debts and liabilities have been paid. - Succession determines who qualifies to inherit. There are 2 types of succession: - 1) Testate = dealing with wills. - 2) Intestate = dealing with no wills. Terminology: - Deceased = person w...