Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
IAF Exam 2 Study Guide with Complete Solutions €12,18   Ajouter au panier

Examen

IAF Exam 2 Study Guide with Complete Solutions

 6 vues  0 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • IAFS
  • Établissement
  • IAFS

IAF Exam 2 Study Guide with Complete Solutions Wars of Aggression - Answer️️ --An unprovoked military attack by one state on another. -Tensions between states that produce arms races, militarized interstate disputes, and war. -Taboo under today's national law. Wars of Self-Defense - Answ...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 4 sur 35  pages

  • 18 septembre 2024
  • 35
  • 2024/2025
  • Examen
  • Questions et réponses
  • IAFS
  • IAFS
avatar-seller
©EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024-2025 September 14, 2024 12:27 PM



IAF Exam 2 Study Guide with Complete
Solutions


Wars of Aggression - Answer✔️✔️--An unprovoked military attack by one state on

another.

-Tensions between states that produce arms races, militarized interstate disputes, and

war.

-Taboo under today's national law.

Wars of Self-Defense - Answer✔️✔️--Defending oneself, one's property, or the wellbeing

of another from harm.

-The right of self-defense is available in many jurisdictions as a legal justification for the

use of force in times of danger, but the interpretation varies widely.

-Sanctioned by the UN

Wars of Preemption - Answer✔️✔️--A strategy of warfare predicated on the legitimacy

and desirability of using military force against an evident security threat from an

adversary prior to one's own state or interests being attacked.

-Ex: US' invasion of Iraq in 2003; US believed that Iraq would attack the US further

down the line, so they struck first.

The Concert of Europe - Answer✔️✔️--The balance of power arrangement in Europe

from the end of the Napoleonic Wars (1815) to the outbreak of WWI (1914).




Page 1 of 35

, ©EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024-2025 September 14, 2024 12:27 PM


-Aimed at maintaining stability and averting major wars between and among the great

powers of the Continent.

Declarations of war's obsolescence - Answer✔️✔️-have persisted, and even expanded,

during the 20th century. The fallacy of triumphal proclamations of the "end of history"

Iron law of the democratic peace - Answer✔️✔️--Democracies do not engage with one

another in war

-Democracy promotion is the key to containing war and expanding the "zone of peace."

-Supported empirically to some degree

New World Order - Answer✔️✔️--Followed the Cold War

-Emphasis on maintaining and promoting peace, democracy, and human rights.

-Referred to a Western-led international system in which particular norms and laws

favored liberal democracy, civil and political rights, and market-led economic

globalization.

-Because capitalism has beat communism, history is ending (history is the competition

of ideas), therefore there should be no more conflict.

"Clash of Civilizations" - Answer✔️✔️--Predicting the future of war.

-This may be the end of war as we know it (territorial, conquest, resources), but war

between identities will be the defining characteristic of wars in the future (civilizational

war).

-The are 6-7 civilizations in the world, and most of them get along, but there are 3 that

do not - Christian, Islamic, and Confucianist; these three cannot coexist. Ex: struggle

between US and the "Islamic state"



Page 2 of 35

, ©EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024-2025 September 14, 2024 12:27 PM


Armed Conflict: Individual Level Analysis - Answer✔️✔️--War is a form of behavior

resulting from an individual's choice.

-War is a byproduct of human nature.

-Individual leaders: the personality traits of leaders, personality may favor taking risks or

a psychological need for power.

Armed Conflict: State Level Analysis - Answer✔️✔️--Iron Law of Democratic Peace.

-Proliferation of weapons: deterrence and failure of deterrence. No two nuclear states

have ever gone to war against one another, MAD.

-Security dilemma: uncertainty!

-Diversionary theory of war.

-Ex: Proliferation of weapons: the reason the US and SU never went to war with each

other during the Cold War is the idea of MAD - the retaliation of an attack by either side

would have resulted in the destruction of both states.

Diversionary theory of war - Answer✔️✔️-A thesis that a war is instigated by a country's

leadership in order to distract its population from their own domestic strife. Countries are

more likely to go to war when experiencing economic stress.

Armed Conflict: System Level Analysis - Answer✔️✔️--Failure of collective security

(global and regional) approach.

-Offensive and defensive realism

-The distribution of power: polarity, relative power, stability of power; systemic wars are

cyclical.




Page 3 of 35

, ©EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024-2025 September 14, 2024 12:27 PM


-The anarchical nature of the system: no regularized and effective process of law

creation, enforcement, or adjudication; "self-help" nature of the system means that

states are ultimately responsible for their own survival and security

Offensive v Defensive realism - Answer✔️✔️--Offensive realism: anarchy rewards the

inherently aggressive tendencies of states and their leaders, who capitalize on it and

purposefully choose war.

-Defensive realism: states and their leaders typically do not choose war.

Global Trends in Armed Conflict - Answer✔️✔️--Estimates point to the occurrence of at

least 14,000 wars throughout recorded history.

-Armed conflict of all types increased by a factor of three during the period 1960-1992.

-The end of the bipolar rivalry of the Cold War helped bring about resolution of

numerous long-standing civil conflicts.

-Democratic transitions in the former Soviet bloc

5.

-Since 1990, there have been only six instances of direct wars between states:

a) Gulf War (1990-1991) and its aftermath

b) Eritrea-Ethiopia (1998-2000)

c) India-Pakistan (1997-2003; 2014)

d) Iraq versus the United States and its allies (2003)

e) Djibouti-Eritrea (2008)

f) Russia-Ukraine (2014-2017)

Old Wars - Answer✔️✔️--fought by and through the state and its organized, professional,

standing armies in pursuit of the national interest.


Page 4 of 35

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur EmillyCharlotte. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €12,18. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

80467 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€12,18
  • (0)
  Ajouter