Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
Recherché précédemment par vous
CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2024 UNISA – DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)€2,70
Ajouter au panier
CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2024 UNISA – DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)
27 vues 1 fois vendu
Cours
Constitutional Law
Établissement
University Of South Africa (Unisa)
Book
South African Constitutional Law in Context
CSL2601 ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO - SEMESTER 1 - 2024 UNISA – DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND A BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)
ASSIGNMENT 2 QUESTIONS
Part A: Justify and explain (with references) why the statement is either True or False
[40 marks. Each answe...
CSL2601 PORTFOLIO MEMO - SEMESTER 2 - 2024 - OCTOBER/NOVEMBER - UNISA - DUE DATE :- 14 OCTOBER 2024 (FULLY REFERENCED! DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)
CSL2601 PORTFOLIO MEMO - OCT./NOV. 2024 - SEMESTER 2 - UNISA - DUE DATE :- 14 OCTOBER 2024 (DETAILED ANSWERS WITH FOOTNOTES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY - DISTINCTION GUARANTEED!)
CSL2601 EXAM PACK 2024/2025 {QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS }
Tout pour ce livre (23)
École, étude et sujet
University of South Africa (Unisa)
Constitutional Law
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (42)
Vendeur
S'abonner
LLBExampacksAndTutorials
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
Tutors you can trust. Voted “BEST
SELLING” memos for the year 2022/2023.
CSL2601
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
ASSIGNMENT 2 MEMO
SEMESTER 1 – 2024 - UNISA
UNIQUE NUMBER: -
DUE DATE: - 3 APRIL 2024
Includes Footnotes and/or Bibliography.
ASSIGNMENT PREVIEW
Part A: Justify and explain (with references) why the statement is either True or False [40 marks. Each answer is worth 2 marks]
1. The most significant aspect of the case of Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker of the National Assembly 2018 (2) SA 571 (CC) (EFF II) is that the
judiciary has too much political power and intrudes into the executive domain.
2. As a member of the uMkhonto we Sizwe party, former President Jacob Zuma has announced his intention to campaign against the right of LGBTIQ+
people to a family life. His opinion is that the ‘legislation supporting same-sex marriage lacks support from the majority of SA’. This scenario is an
example of the principle of subsidiarity.
3. When carefully analysed, the recent case of United Democratic Movement and Others v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 280;
005779/2023 (5 May 2023) – the “loadshedding” case – is an instance of judicial over-reach.
4. The counter-majoritarian dilemma has no relevance to South African Constitutional Law. It is simply a convenient excuse that politicians invoke when
the judiciary is counter- revolutionary.
5. The horizontal distribution of power in South Africa is exactly how multi-sphere governance works in South Africa.
QUESTIONS CONTINUE…
Disclaimer
Extreme care has been used by our Tutors to draft this document, however the contents are provided “as is” without any representations
or warranties, express or implied. This document is to be used for comparison, research and reference purposes ONLY. No part of this
document may be reproduced, resold or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission from the Author. –
LLB EXAMPACKS & TUTORIALS.
Part A: Justify and explain (with references) why the statement is either True or
False [40 marks. Each answer is worth 2 marks]
1. The most significant aspect of the case of Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker
of the National Assembly 2018 (2) SA 571 (CC) (EFF II) is that the judiciary has too
much political power and intrudes into the executive domain.
2. As a member of the uMkhonto we Sizwe party, former President Jacob Zuma has
announced his intention to campaign against the right of LGBTIQ+ people to a
family life. His opinion is that the ‘legislation supporting same-sex marriage lacks
support from the majority of SA’. This scenario is an example of the principle of
subsidiarity.
3. When carefully analysed, the recent case of United Democratic Movement and
Others v Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 280; 005779/2023
(5 May 2023) – the “loadshedding” case – is an instance of judicial over-reach.
4. The counter-majoritarian dilemma has no relevance to South African
Constitutional Law. It is simply a convenient excuse that politicians invoke when
the judiciary is counter- revolutionary.
5. The horizontal distribution of power in South Africa is exactly how multi-sphere
governance works in South Africa.
6. The formal removal of an official office-bearer for gross misconduct or gross
incompetence is known as recusal.
7. According to the case of de Lille and Another v Speaker of the National Assembly
1998 (3) SA 785 (CC), parliamentary privilege is the right to freedom of speech of
members of parliament and the protection not to be held liable to civil or criminal
proceedings, arrest, imprisonment or damages for saying or revealing anything in
Parliament.
8. The responsibility placed on the legislature to include the views of interested
parties by permitting submissions being made and considering these views in
good faith is known as public participation.
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur LLBExampacksAndTutorials. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €2,70. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
