Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics (EBB110A05)
Établissement
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen (RuG)
Dit is een samenvatting van het vak Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics waarin de hoorcolleges, eventuele artikelen en de uitgebreide samenvatting van het vak wordt samengevat. Hierdoor staat alle nuttige informatie in 1 document en blijft het overzichtelijk.
Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics (EBB110A05)
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (3)
1
vérifier
Par: jartdb • 1 semaine de cela
Traduit par Google
A whole week is missing and it only contains slides that have been taken literally, not even clarified
Vendeur
S'abonner
emmavoortman
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
Teamwork - Theories, Design and Dynamics
Hoorcollege 1
Work teams: interdependent collection of individuals who share responsibility for specific outcomes
for their organization.
Why are team so popular:
“Teams offer the potential for synergy, that wonderful state when a group ‘clicks’ and members
achieve something together that no one of them could possibly have accomplished alone”
Teams bring more resources
Diversity in background and expertise
Flexibility, keep the work going
What are work teams?
- Interdependence as a defining feature
- dictionary definition: ‘the dependence of two or more people or things on each other’
- interdependence is everywhere
Low:
- Individual tasks are pooled at the end as group output
- Individual contributions are valued (rewarded) more than collective contributions
- Redundant individual resources/ expertise etc.
High:
- Individuals work simultaneously on all aspects of the task
- Rewards are based on the collective output/ end product
- Members differ in their type and quantity of resources
Two different types of work teams:
1. Task interdependence: the degree to which members depend on another for access to critical
resources and create workflows that require coordinated action
2. Outcome interdependence: the degree to which goals are formulated and outcomes are
rewarded in terms of collective rather than individual contributions
TEAM: together everyone achieves more
Are work teams really that effective?
Richard hackman: ‘research evidence about team performance shows that teams usually do
less well – not better- than the sum of their members’ individual contributions
, In a lab study of 33 teams: ‘probably 4 of our 33 groups were actually effective teams. The
rest had problems so severe that our analysis was mainly about what had gone wrong with
them’
Several features are needed for teams to be successful
What do work teams need to be effective?
- TASK
do not us a team for work that is better one by individuals
- STUCTURE
to recap the benefits of teamwork, one must actually build the team
set boundaries, define relationships, divide tasks, form relationships with stakeholders
- LEADERSHIP AND SUPPORT
leaders need to give direction to avoid ambiguity
the organizational context needs to provides support that is specifically tuned to the needs of
work teams
it is important to reward collective outcomes
The model
Star players -> coordination -> performance
The basic IMOI model
Input -> mediator -> output
1. Input
Team design
- composition
- interdependence
- leaderschip and authority
Task factors
Context
Potential performance: performance that a team could achieve
- is high when teams have the resources that are required by the task
Task types and potential performance
Actual performance (Steiner, 1972)
= potential performance – process loss
- coordination loss
- motivation loss
, 2. Mediators
Team processes: members interdependent acts that convert inputs to outcomes through
cognitive, verbal, and behavioral activities directed toward organizing taskwork to achieve
collective goals
Emergent states: constructs that characterize properties of the team that are typically
dynamic in nature and vary as a function of team context, inputs, processes, and outcomes
Cohesion (emergent state)
The force that binds members to the team and induces them to stay in with the team
- task cohesion: shared commitment to the team task
- interpersonal cohesion: attraction to the team
Meta-analytic correlation with performance
- task: .27
- interpersonal: .14
Causality?
Mullen & Copper, 1994
The IMOI model
3. Output
Nijstad, 2009
Bunderson & Sutcliffe, 2002
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur emmavoortman. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €6,99. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
