Een samenvatting van alle problemen en jurisprudentie van dit vak. Helemaal op kleur gestorteerd per onderwerp en aan het einde van de samenvatting nog een korte samenvatting (van de samenvatting haha). Alles wat je moet weten! Ik had een 8 :)
The summary is very clear and helps you understand the legislation and case law. The contact was also very fast and pleasant! I would recommend this one.
Par: renée3 • 6 mois de cela
Vendeur
S'abonner
FFstuv
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
TENTAMEN EUROPEAN LAW: JHA
PROBLEM 1A – SCHENGEN......................................................................................................................................... 4
The Schengen Area.............................................................................................................................................................4
Border checks for persons entering the Schengen Area (EXTERNAL).................................................................................4
Checks within the Schengen Member States (INTERNAL)..................................................................................................5
Case C-278/12 PPU Atiqullah Adil..................................................................................................................................5
Schengen rules regarding the reintroduction of border controls/closing the borders.......................................................6
SHORT SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................................................8
PROBLEM 1B – FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS........................................................................................................... 8
Rights of EU citizens and their family members regarding movement and residence in another MS...............................9
Rights of TCN’s and their family members regarding movement and residence in another MS.....................................10
Losing right to residence for EU citizens and family members........................................................................................11
Case C-145/09 Land Baden-Württemberg v Panagiotis Tsakouridis............................................................................11
Case C-348/09 P.I. v Oberbürgermeisterin der Stadt Remscheid (P.I.)........................................................................12
Family reunification for TCN’s under EU law....................................................................................................................12
How far reaching is the fundamental status of EU citizenship?......................................................................................13
Case C-34/09 Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEm) (Zambrano).........................................13
Case C-836/18 Subdelegación del Gobierno en Ciudad Real v. RH (Gabierno)...........................................................15
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................15
PROBLEM 2A............................................................................................................................................................ 17
Criteria for refugee...........................................................................................................................................................17
Joined cases C-199/12 and C-201/12 Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel v. X. Y.Z......................................................19
Joined cases C-71/11 and C-99/11 Bundesrepublik Deutschland v Y and Z................................................................19
Criteria for subsidiary protection.....................................................................................................................................20
Case C-465/07 Meki Elgafaji and Noor Elgafaji v Staatssecretaris van Justitie............................................................21
Case C-901/19 CF and DN v Bundesrepublik Deutschland..........................................................................................22
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................22
PROBLEM 2B............................................................................................................................................................ 23
Common rules on reception/living conditions for refugees and migrants.......................................................................23
Common rules for asylum procedures..............................................................................................................................23
Responsible Member State...............................................................................................................................................24
Case C-648/11, MA, BT, DA v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] ECLI:EU:C:2013:93...................25
Not transferring under Dublin III due Human Rights Violations......................................................................................26
M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece App no. 30696/09 (ECtHR, 21 January 2011), focus on paras. 9-30 and 335-359 of the
judgment......................................................................................................................................................................26
Joined cases C-411/10 and C-493/10, N.S v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, and M.E, A.S.M, M.T, K.P
and E.H v. Refugee Applications Commissioner, Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2011]
ECLI:EU:C:2011:865......................................................................................................................................................26
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................27
PROBLEM 3A............................................................................................................................................................ 28
1
, The European Arrest Warrant..........................................................................................................................................28
Case C-303/05 Advocaten voor de Wereld v. Leden van de Ministerraad [2007] ECLI:EU:C:2007:261......................30
Refusion of the execution of a European Arrest Warrant................................................................................................30
Case C-42/11 Joao Pedro Lopes Da Silva Jorge [2012] ECLI:EU:C:2012: 517...............................................................31
PROBLEM 3B............................................................................................................................................................ 31
Fundamental rights in the EAW.......................................................................................................................................31
Refusing of an EAW on human rights grounds................................................................................................................32
Case C-396/11 Ministrul Public – Parchetul de pe langa Curtea de Apel Constanta v Ciprian Vasile Radu. – regarding
trials in absentia (Radu)................................................................................................................................................32
Case C-399/11 Stefano Melloni v. Ministerio Fiscal.....................................................................................................33
Case: Aranyosi and Caldararu.......................................................................................................................................33
Case C-216/18 PPU Minister for Justice and Equality v LM.........................................................................................34
SHORT SUMMARY 3A & 3B!.............................................................................................................................................35
PROBLEM 4A............................................................................................................................................................ 36
EU legal framework on data protection...........................................................................................................................36
When and to whom do EU data rules apply?...................................................................................................................36
Principles of data protection............................................................................................................................................37
Data protection rights for individuals..............................................................................................................................37
Case law: Google v. Spain.............................................................................................................................................37
Transferring personal data to third countries..................................................................................................................38
Case law: Schrems I......................................................................................................................................................38
Case law: Schrems II.....................................................................................................................................................38
Rules for collecting and processing personal data for criminal justice purposes............................................................39
Case law: Digital Rights Ireland v. Ireland....................................................................................................................39
SHORT SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................40
PROBLEM 4B............................................................................................................................................................ 41
Europol.............................................................................................................................................................................41
Difference, similarities, and cooperation between Europol and Eurojust........................................................................42
Consequences of Eurojust and Europol being established through intergovernmental cooperation.............................43
Frontex.............................................................................................................................................................................43
LECTURES................................................................................................................................................................. 45
Lecture 1 – The EU & Area of freedom, security, and justice...........................................................................................45
Lecture 2 – Understanding the functioning of the AFSJ (I)...............................................................................................49
Case C-184/99 Grzelczyk..............................................................................................................................................50
Case C-200/02 Zhu and Chen.......................................................................................................................................50
Case C-85/96 Martinez Sala.........................................................................................................................................50
Case C-333/13 Dano.....................................................................................................................................................50
Case C-256/11 Dereci...................................................................................................................................................51
Case Coman..................................................................................................................................................................51
Case C-508/10 Commission v. Netherlands.................................................................................................................51
Lecture 3 – Understanding the functioning of the AFSJ (II)..............................................................................................52
Joined Cases C-643.15 and C-647/15 Slovak Republic and Hungary v. Council...........................................................54
Joined Cases C-715/17, C-718/17 and C-719/17 Commission v Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic................54
2
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur FFstuv. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €4,49. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
