these are in depth case summaries made by Kaya Borkowski and Jamie-Lou Ross. They contain: Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security,
Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education,
National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs,Thubakgale and Others v Eku...
Great notes! In depth. Includes 16 cases from the semester. Explains Facts, Issues, the Courts decision and outcome as well as relevance of the case.
Vendeur
S'abonner
LawGuru
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
PBL2003W
University of Cape Town
By Jamie-Lou Ross & K Borkowski
September Test Cases
PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS, & INTERPRETING & APPLYING THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Litigating the Bill of Rights
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security
Christian Education South Africa v Minister of Education
National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Home Affairs
Thubakgale and Others v Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality and Others
PART 2: FREEDOM RIGHTS
Ubuntu and Human dignity
S v Makwanyane and Another
Dawood v Minister of Home Affairs
The Right to Equality and ‘Remedial’ or ‘Restitutionary’ Measures
Harksen v Lane NO
Hoffman v South African Airways
S v Jordan and Others
Mahlangu and Another v Minister of Labour and Others.
Minister of Finance v Van Heerden.
Freedom of Expression & Hate Speech
Islamic Unity Convention v Independent Broadcasting Authority and Others
Afriforum and Another v Malema and Others
Nelson Mandela Foundation Trust v Afriforum NPC and Another
Qwelane v South African Human Rights Commission and Another
Afriforum v Economic Freedom Fighters and Others.
DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS ILLEGAL
PIERRE DE VOS; WARREN FREEDMAN; ZSA-ZSA BOGGENPOEL. 2021.
SOUTH AFRICAN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW IN CONTEXT SECOND EDITION.
OXFORD: OXFORD UNIV PRESS UK.
, PART 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE BILL OF RIGHTS, & INTERPRETING & APPLYING THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Litigating the Bill of Rights
Carmichele v Minister of Safety and Security 2001 (CC)
Facts
● The applicant was sexually assaulted by a man who was awaiting trial for the attempted rape of another woman
● Concerns an indirect vertical application of a positive obligation in a dispute governed by common law
● Despite the seriousness of the alleged crime and the fact that the man had a prior rape conviction, the police and prosecutor had
recommended that the man be released pending trial
● The applicant sued the Minister for damages, arguing that the police and prosecutors had negligently failed to comply with a legal
duty they owed to her to take steps to prevent the man from causing her harm
● HC dismissed the applicant's claim & SCA affirmed, holding that the police and prosecution did not owe her a duty of protection
● Appeal to the Constitutional Court
Issue
● If police or prosecutors owed a duty of care to a victim of sexual violence, &, if so, whether that standard of care was breached?
Outcome
● State is obligated by Constitution to protect the dignity and security of women
● Police have positive obligations to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms contained in the BORs
● In the circumstances, the police recommendation for the assailant's release could amount to wrongful conduct giving rise to liability
● Ackermann and Goldstone JJ held that, although the major engine for law reform should be the legislature, courts are under a general
duty to develop the common law when it deviates from the spirit, purport and objects of the BORs.
● S 39(2) Constitution provides that when developing the common law, every court must promote the spirit, purport, and objects of the
BORs
● Prosecutors, who were under a general duty to place before a court any information relevant to the refusal or grant of bail, might
reasonably be held liable for negligently failing to fulfil that duty
● It was ordered that the matter be referred back to the HC for the trial to be continued.
● Obligation of courts to develop the common law, in the context of the s 39(2) objectives, is not purely discretionary.
● On the contrary, it is implicit in s 39(2) read with s 173 that where the common law as it stands is deficient in promoting the s 39(2)
objectives, courts are under a general obligation to develop it appropriately.
● BORs is used to develop the rules and remedies of the ordinary law so that the ‘objective normative value system’ that permeates the
Bill of Rights is given effect
Significance
● Decision set an important precedent with its recognition that sexual violence is not a private matter and that public officials have a
duty to protect women.
Christian Education SA v Minister of Education 2000 (C)
Facts
● Appellant applied for an order declaring s 10 South African Schools Act (SASA) - prohibited corporal punishment in public schools -
to be unconstitutional & invalid on grounds that it infringed inter alia their R to religious freedom guaranteed in s 15(1) Const
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur LawGuru. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €4,28. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
