Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Ultimate A* Level Politics Essay Plans - Paper 1 + 2 €12,26   Ajouter au panier

Dissertation

Ultimate A* Level Politics Essay Plans - Paper 1 + 2

1 vérifier
 409 vues  6 achats
  • Cours
  • Établissement

Contains 19 A* essay plans for Paper 1 and Paper 2 Edexcel Politics. I achieved an A* in the 2022 exams, these essay plans are in great detail with key statistics and evidence and strong analysis needed to get into the top level :) 1. How secure are the rights of UK citizens 2. Which party syste...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 1 sur 38  pages

  • 17 avril 2023
  • 38
  • 2022/2023
  • Dissertation
  • Inconnu
  • A+

1  vérifier

review-writer-avatar

Par: davidmcgrath2006 • 8 mois de cela

avatar-seller
How secure are the rights of UK citizens?
PARA 1 - SECURE:
The rst argument that suggests that the rights of UK citizens are secure, is the Human
Rights Act (1998), sets out rights clearly and in detail, and UK courts can issue a
'declaration of incompatibility' if legislation does not comply with these rights, putting
pressure on the government to back down.
For example, in 2010, F and Angus Thompson v Secretary of State for the Home
Department, looked at teenagers who had been convicted of sexual o ences and were
on the register for the rest of their lives. They argued that inclusion on register for so long,
with no chance of being reviewed was against their Hrs. The S.C made a 'declaration of
incompatibility' and parliament changed it so that sex o enders could be reviewed and
potentially taken o the register after a certain point.
This demonstrates that, through judicial review, our fundamental human rights are
protected and upheld in a variety of circumstances.
PARA 1 - NOT SECURE:
On the other hand, it could be argued that as only a declaration of incompatibility is
made, and there are no legal changes are enforced, our human rights are not actually
as secure as they may seem.
For example, in June 2018, the UK Supreme Court made a declaration of incompatibility
under the Human Rights Act 1998, nding that the Civil Partnerships Act 2004 was
incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. However, while the
government accepted that the law was indeed discriminatory, they argued that they
should be allowed more time to consider how to deal with and eliminate the
discrimination, and no changes were forced upon them.
This demonstrates that actually, the ultimate power lies with the government and the fact
that they decide the necessary changes to implement, suggests that judicial review does
not always su ciently secure our rights.


PARA 2 - SECURE:
Another way in which it is arguable that our rights are secured, is through the Freedom of
Information Act (2000), which gives citizens the right to access information and les held
about themselves by from public bodies, and also the 'right to know' about certain forms
of political misconduct.
Examples of facts that have been brought to light by the Act include a bailout of troubled
academy schools, details of MPs’ expenses claims, possible crimes committed by foreign
diplomats, the criminal records of policy o cers, and implants made available to girls as
young as 13 to try to cut teenage pregnancies.
This demonstrates the way in which this Act helps to protect and secure our rights by
creating a more open and transparent political system, where the electorate are informed
about any necessary events or policies.
PARA 2 - NOT SECURE:
However, it could be argued that the Freedom of Information Act has not taken su cient
measures to ensure that our rights are protected, as it is not entrenched, and certain
exemptions can be made.
For example, this Act gives the government the right to veto the release of certain
information. So far this veto has been used on 5 occasions, most recently in blocking the
release of letters written by Prince Charles, to government ministers, and the release of
risk registers produced by civil servants on the potential dangers of the planned NHS
reforms.




fi ffi ff fi ffi ff ff fiffi

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur student712. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €12,26. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

73314 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€12,26  6x  vendu
  • (1)
  Ajouter