Thank you for the review! Hope the exams went well.
Par: 2002amj • 1 année de cela
Par: giacomoef • 1 année de cela
Thank you for the positive review!
Par: marawankhalil1 • 1 année de cela
Par: tariksmaaili • 1 année de cela
Par: giacomoef • 1 année de cela
Thank you for the review!
Vendeur
S'abonner
giacomoef
Avis reçus
Aperçu du contenu
Notes on the lectures from the course (2023) International Law and Human Rights. INCLUDES notes
from lectures 1-11 (Total: 32 pages).
International Law and Human Rights Lecture Notes (Lectures 1-11)
Table of Contents
I. History & Theories of IL 1
Lecture 1: International Law & the Study of Politics 1
Lecture 2: IL & IR Theory 2
Lecture 3: The History of IL (I) 4
Lecture 4: The History of IL (II) 7
II. Core Concepts & Institutions of IL 10
Lecture 5: Sources of IL 10
Lecture 6: Subjects of IL 13
Lecture 7: International Courts 16
III. Issues in International Law and Human Rights 20
Lecture 8: IL on the Use of Force 20
Lecture 9: International Humanitarian Law 23
Lecture 10: International Human Rights Law 26
Lecture 11: International Criminal Law 28
, 1
I. History & Theories of IL
Lecture 1: International Law & the Study of Politics
What is international law? Is it law?
International Law (IL): The body of rules/practices that states consider binding in their mutual
relations.
➔ Law can be understood as:
◆ A set of rules.
◆ A professional practice.
◆ An independent social phenomenon.
◆ An epiphenomenal reflection of power.
➔ Is IL really law?
◆ Compared to municipal law (domestic law), IL has many distinctive features →
traditionally rejected the idea that IL is law.
➔ Traditionally, IL:
◆ Is based on voluntary adhesion (in most cases).
◆ Has weak or NO enforcement mechanisms (although increasing legalisation?).
◆ Rules are few & vague (is this changing?).
If Law:
● Sovereign command backed by the threat of sanctions (Austin) → IL is probably NOT law.
● About a rule identifying which rules are law (Hart’s rule of recognition) → IL = law?
Does the expansion of the definition of law dilute the distinctive nature & authority of legal rules? If
the following are ‘law’, what is NOT law?
● “Hard Law”: Law traditionally understood by most people = form of written & legally binding
treaties.
● “Soft Law”: Variety of non-binding normatively worded instruments used in contemporary IR
by States & IOs → can be suggestions.
The Study of Politics & IL: An Uneasy Relationship
IL has always been studied as part of the study IR = uneasy relationship:
● Originating from WWI’s end to WWII, IR had a strong legalist bent.
● IL was viewed as a key to securing world peace → Kellogg–Briand Pact (1928) that
“outlawed” war.
➔ “It is probably the case that almost all nations observe almost all principles of
international law and almost all of their obligations almost all of the time.”
● HOWEVER, the experience of WWII provoked a breach between the 2 disciplines.
In the post-war era, international lawyers: IR scholars, meanwhile:
○ Emphasised IL’s separation from ○ Ignored IL, even when it overlapped
politics. with their topics of interest.
○ Focused on studying specific legal rules ○ Spoke of “regimes”, “norms”,
& decision-making processes “institutions” > discussing “law”.
, 2
(“doctrinal scholarship”).
● Nevertheless, IL underwent explosive growth → key international
institutions/treaties/regimes (e.g., UN, GATT/WTO, EU, etc) were born after WWII.
➔ Does this prove IL’s resilience? Or its derivative status from power relations?
● Post-Cold War, there has been a partial rapprochement between IL & IR.
➔ HOWEVER the study of IL qua politics still takes a distinct approach from the study of
IL qua law.
Lecture 2: IL & IR Theory
1. Realism
Realists: Most critical of IL’s potential to constrain state behaviour = insistence on compliance with
legal rules without great power buy-in may even make war more likely.
➔ IL = epiphenomenal → bad product of state self-interest (instinct of the exercise of power =
NO autonomy).
➔ Law has a moderating function within states = hierarchy of authority & enforcement.
◆ HOWEVER, NO hierarchy/institutions exist outside = law CANNOT deliver promises.
➔ State compliance with IL ≠ prove that it is effective.
◆ Effectiveness = law can make states act in ways contrary to their self-interest.
◆ Compliance = mere happenstance when cost-benefit calculus is preferable.
➔ Realist approaches to IL:
◆ Classical Realists (Keenan, Morgenthau): Still willing to talk about IL, only to
disparage it.
◆ Structural (Neo-) Realists (Waltz): Do NOT bother. States are like units existing under
structural anarchy → nothing else really matters (certainly NOT law).
◆ Most realists are willing to acknowledge that IL can have important functions BUT
NOT that it has autonomous explanatory power for state behaviour:
● Steinberg on IL:
○ “May be Pareto-improving” → make transactions more efficient.
○ “Create incentives and opportunities for weaker states to change [...]
in ways favoured by powerful states.”
○ “Facilitate cooperation among powerful states in their relations with
weaker states.”
○ “Generate information flows for powerful states.”
Questions challenging the REALIST perspective:
● How do we explain the explosive growth of IL (“legalisation” of IR) in numerical terms but also in
terms of scope?
● How do explain instances where strong states are constrained by law/weaker states use law
successfully against strong states?
● What about the role of law within states in terms of shaping foreign policy preferences?
2. Liberal Institutionalism
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur giacomoef. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €9,49. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
