Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
History igcse core content essay questions and answers GCSE/IGCSE €3,70   Ajouter au panier

Examen

History igcse core content essay questions and answers GCSE/IGCSE

 114 vues  1 fois vendu
  • Cours
  • Établissement
  • Book

This document has 100 essay questions and answers for the core content paper 1 and 2 exams. It includes questions from past papers and history text books. The answers include source anaylsis and essays. The document is very useful to read or memorize before a test as one of the questions on the doc...

[Montrer plus]

Aperçu 3 sur 20  pages

  • 2 mars 2023
  • 20
  • 2022/2023
  • Examen
  • Questions et réponses
  • 4
avatar-seller

Questions d'entraînement disponibles

Fiches 10 Fiches
€3,70 0 vendus

Quelques exemples de cette série de questions pratiques

1.

What was the Nazi soviet pact?

Réponse: The pact was an agreement of convenience between the two bitter ideological enemies. It permitted Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union to carve up spheres of influence in eastern Europe, while pledging not to attack each other for 10 years.

2.

What was the policy of appeasement?

Réponse: Instituted in the hope of avoiding war, appeasement was the name given to Britain\'s policy in the 1930s of allowing Hitler to expand German territory unchecked. Most closely associated with British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain, it is now widely discredited as a policy of weakness.

3.

What was the Anschluss with Austria?

Réponse: The Anschluss (German: [ˈʔanʃlʊs] ( listen), or Anschluß, lit. \'joining\' or \'connection\'), also known as the Anschluß Österreichs ( pronunciation (help. info), English: Annexation of Austria), was the annexation of the Federal State of Austria into the German Reich on 13 March 1938.

4.

Describe the invasion of the Sudetenland.

Réponse: The Sudetenland was assigned to Germany between 1 and 10 October 1938. The Czech part of Czechoslovakia was subsequently invaded by Germany in March 1939, with a portion being annexed and the remainder turned into the Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia.

5.

Why did WW2 start?

Réponse: Hitler\'s invasion of Poland in September 1939 drove Great Britain and France to declare war on Germany, marking the beginning of World War II. Over the next six years, the conflict would take more lives and destroy more land and property around the globe than any previous war.

History igcse core content review


Weaknesses of league of nations (History igcse).docx
https://www.markedbyteachers.com/gcse/history/what-were-the-consequences-of-the-
failure-of-the-league-in-the-1930s.html
https://igcse-history.weebly.com/why-had-international-peace-collapsed-by-1939.html
https://www.historyonthenet.com/why-did-the-league-of-nations-fail

file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/To_what_extent.docx.pdf
Successes of league of nations:

• The league’s organization was quick to react at times. In 1921 Germany and Poland
were fighting over the land of Upper Silesia.
• In 1925, the League helped to resolve a dispute between Greece and Bulgaria. Both
these nations have a common border.
• The League then sent experts to the area and decided that Greece was to blame and
fined her £45,000. Both nations accepted the decision.
• The league of nations helped free 200,000 slaves.
• In 1923 the League faced problems in Turkey. The League failed to stop a bloody war in
Turkey, but it did respond to the humanitarian crisis caused by this war. 1,400,000
refugees had been created by this war with 80% of them being women and children.
The League sent doctors from the Health Organization to check the spread of disease
and it spent £10 million on building farms, homes etc. for the refugees. Money was also
invested in seeds, wells and digging tools and by 1926, work was found for 600,000
people
Failures of the league of nations:

• A big weakness of the league was the self-interest of its leading members. The League
depended upon Britain and France to provide firm support in times of crisis. However,
these countries were too nationalistic and when conflicts did occur neither Britain or
France was willing to abandon their own self-interests to support the league.
• When the league started for business in January 1920 the American chair was empty.
America never joined the league.
• When a crisis occurred, the League was supposed to act quickly. However, the League
met too infrequently and took too long to make decisions. Its democratic approach
meant that it took a long time to reach a decision and often a decision would not be
reached until it was pointless.

, • The league was unable to stop Fascist dictatorships taking power in Germany, Italy and
Japan.


English book
Question plan done

Answer to find on grade saver
Answer to finish
Answer in book
Memorized

To do at home



Questions:
• Why did the league of nations fail? (6)
• Who was Lloyd George/Clemenceau/Wilson? (4:) (Pages in textbook)
• What were the motives and aims of the big three at Versailles? (4) (Pages in textbook)
• Describe the Anglo German naval agreement. (4)
The Anglo-German Naval Agreement of 18 June 1935 was a naval agreement between the
United Kingdom and Germany regulating the size of the Kriegsmarine in relation to the Royal
Navy. The Anglo-German Naval Agreement broke the terms of the Versailles Treaty by allowing
Germany to have more ships than agreed. It showed that Britain was more concerned with
protecting itself than upholding the Treaty of Versailles. The Anglo-German Naval Agreement
fixed a ratio whereby the total tonnage of the Kriegsmarine was to be 35% of the total tonnage
of the Royal Navy on a permanent basis. It was registered in the League of Nations Treaty Series
on 12 July 1935. The agreement was abrogated by Adolf Hitler on 28 April 1939.
• Describe the Stresa front pact (4).
The Stresa Pact was an agreement between Britain, France, and Italy which formalized
opposition to German rearmament. It committed Britain, France and Italy to work together
against Germany. Even though it was negotiated at the same time as the Abyssinian Crisis, it did
not once mention Abyssinia. It proposed measures to counter Hitler's open rearmament of
Germany in defiance of the Versailles Peace Settlement. Together these countries formed the
“Stresa Front” against German aggression, but their decisions were never implemented.
• Why did all the victors not get everything they wanted? (6)

, All victors didn’t get everything they wanted because the allies had different opinions on
things. For example, the French wanted to cripple Germany, so they wouldn’t have the power
to cause another war. On the other hand, Britain and America didn’t want to be to harsh on
Germany because they thought that this could result into another war. France was unhappy
with Germany being let off easy. Britain and France also disagreed with Wilson’s 14 points;
Clemenceau commented: “even god only needed 10 commandments”. Therefore, in the end
Woodrow Wilson also did not get his ’14 points’ established because the other powers did not
agree with them. Overall, the victors were limited in their choices by each other’s differences.
Another reason all victors didn’t get everything that they wanted was because they couldn’t
always put their self-interests to protect other countries. The Abyssinian crisis is a great
example. On November 7th, the league placed sanctions on Italy for invading Abyssinia. France
and Britain risked their good relationship with Italy to protect Abyssinia. The league needed
Italy because it provided exports for the country however, they still helped Abyssinia. This
shows that since the victors didn’t put themselves first by helping other countries, they often
risked the things they wanted. Another example is the fight of getting Upper Silesia between
Poland and Germany. Even though France wanted to cripple Germany, they league still had to
give Germany some areas of upper Silesia to make things fair instead of following their self-
interests and causing more conflict.
• Could the treaties be justified at the time? (10)
The treaty could have been justified because it was too harsh on Germany since it caused
economic and social problems in the country. The treaty was unfair towards Germany, it put all
the war guilt on its people. The treaty even affected the people who had nothing to do with the
war. War left 600,00 widows and 2 million children without fathers in Germany- however the
treaty spared no sympathy and made Germany pay big reparations. Due to the treaty’s harsh
terms, the state was spending about one-third of its budget on reparations instead of spending
it on struggling families. There were also acute shortages of food and 300,000 Germans died
from starvation and hyperthermia in 1918. The treaty also humiliated the Germany by army
limits and war guilt. This caused many violent uprisings to take place which led to Germany
becoming an unstable democratic republic. When Germany was unable to pay reparations,
French and Belgian troops invaded the Rhineland which was completely allowed under the
TOV. The French expelled over 100,000 workers and took Germany’s goods. Germany decided
to go on strike and print more money which led to hyperinflation. The hyperinflation caused
social problems in Germany and extremist groups started rising.
Another reason the treaty could have been justified is because it didn’t give all the victors
what it wanted. All victors didn’t get everything they wanted because the allies had different
opinions on things. For example, the French wanted to cripple Germany, so they wouldn’t have
the power to cause another war. The treaty didn’t give the French justice after all they’ve been
through because of Germany. On the other hand, Britain and America didn’t want to be to
harsh in Germany because they thought that this could result into another war. France was
unhappy with Germany being let off easy. Britain and France also disagreed with Wilson’s 14
points; Clemenceau commented: “even god only needed 10 commandments”. Therefore, in
the end Woodrow Wilson also did not get his ’14 points’ established because the other powers

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur anukikilasonia. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €3,70. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

77983 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€3,70  1x  vendu
  • (0)
  Ajouter