Hi,
Ik ben een student uit het schakelprogramma Communicatiewetenschappen (academiejaar ) en ik heb een samenvatting gemaakt van het vak Political Rhetoric. Deze cursus werd gegeven door Julie Sevenans . De samenvatting bestaat uit de powerpoints, notities gemaakt tijdens de les evenals notities...
Lectures will be recorded
Written exam
● Analysis of a speech (classical rhetoric)
● Knowledge question(s)
● Insight question(s)
● Applied question(s)
Lecture 1: Introduction to political rhetoric
The importance of political rhetoric
No politics without persuasion
● Ex. Send an email to our local mayor to change something in our street
● Reason: uncertainty → this makes persuasion so important
Persuasion by speech vs. persuasion by force
● Voluntary decision to be convinced by the other person / identification by the person
who persuades you
● Violence → ex. fight in my war and if you don’t obey, I put you in prison
Persuasion is a symbolic process in which communicators try to convince other people to
change their own attitudes or behaviors regarding an issue through the transmission of a
message in an atmosphere of free choice.
Democracy is distinguished as a form of governance by the extent of persuasion relative to
coercion.
The fundamental political skill?
What is rhetoric?
Greek: ‘retoriketekhne’
● Rhetor = speaker
● Tekhne = art
Studying rhetoric = learning the practical skills of persuasion
● Learning the techniques (ex. which kind of arguments are the most promising)
Studying rhetoric = studying the persuasiveness of speech
Not limited to spoken word (oratory)
● Written word
1
, ● Visuals that you include in the background when you are speaking
Political rhetoric
Many areas in which the persuasiveness of messages is studied
● Ex. marketing, law (criminal court), organization studies, cultural studies, …
Persuasion in the political realm
● Not limited to politicians
● Many people can organize a demonstration, find a audience and try to convince
others
● Ex. Steven de Gucht (Covid times)
● Ex. Emma Watson (gender equality)
Warm-up exercise
“Most famous persuasive speech in history.” | Martin Luther King - I have a dream
● Activist leader of civil rights movement
● August 1963
● March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom
● 100 years after Emancipation Proclamation (Lincoln)
● Do you find it persuasive?
● Elements which you think makes the speech persuasive?
○ Credibility as a person
■ Who he is
■ Displaying eloquence, expertise, reason
○ Arousal of emotion (metaphors)
■ Ex. No, no, we are not satisfied, and we will not be satisfied until
justice rolls down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream.
○ Convincing arguments
○ Use of rhetorical devices
■ Ex. repetitions, allusions, rhyme
○ How he speaks
A diverse research field?
Different backgrounds, different questions
● Linguistics (ex. rhetorical figures)
● Psychology (ex. emotions vs. the cognitive)
● Political science (ex. questions of power → who can speak and who is not seen as a
political figure)
● Communication science (ex. mass media)
Each with their own terminology & research methods
Difficulty: they don’t always talk to each other
This course: eclectic approach
2
,Reminder of today
Reading: Handbook by James Martin (Chapter 1 & 2)
1) Is rhetoric a bad / dangerous thing?
● Roots of the debate: classical thinkers / political theorists
● Explanation by Martin: political vs the political
2) Situating rhetoric
Rhetoric, a contested notion
Words often associated with rhetoric: “mere”, “empty” → rhetoric is contrasted with reality
Association with danger
● Ex. Divisive political rhetoric a danger to the world, Amnesty says about Donald
Trump
● Rhetoric can contain false information
● Can people be persuaded of anything? → violence, misinformation
● At the same time: no democracy without free speech? → everyone is allowed to
express their opinion
Rhetoric was central to ancient democracy
History:
● Greece, 500 BC
● From aristocracy to democracy
○ Demos = people
○ Ekklesia = assembly
● Highly participatory system
○ Status of being citizen comes with obligations
● Rhetorical skills were important → ex. when you were accused of something, you
had to defend yourself in court
● Teachers: sophists → instructed people into the techniques of persuasiveness
○ Sophos = wisdom
○ Ex. Gorgias, Protagoras
● Culture of oral transmission
First classical thinker - Plato
Rhetoric is empty and dangerous
● It can persuade most people of anything; a ‘rudderless boat’; “sophostries” (trics to
convince people of things that are actually not true)
● Can do bad instead of good (death of his mentor Socrates)
Belief in one moral “truth”
● Allegory of the cave
3
, ● Only a small elite can see it as what they really are (concepts in their pure form)
● There is one big truth, but only a few of us are given the capacity to see the truth. all
the other citizens don’t have it.
“The Republic”
● Society should be based on reason
● Strict division: philosopher-kings, guardians and traders
Ideas were later criticized (ex. Popper)
● Defense of very totalitarian system
● You defend only a few people should have all the power, because they are better
than the rest
More sympathetic reading: argument for alternative type of rhetoric (dialectic: if you have a
conversation where you want to persuade people, than you have to come to the best
solution)
● Technocracy today (rhetoric would be empty and dangerous)
Aristotle
Student of Plato
More positive reading of rhetoric
● Man is a ‘political animal’
● ‘Good life’ is living in accordance with community (vs. Plato: natural state)
Rhetoric complements philosophical reasoning
● How should the best case be put, given the argument, evidence, audience?
● Best case is not always clear → sometimes there is uncertainty
“The art of rhetoric”
● He builds a systematic classification of techniques that are used in rhetoric
● Which kind of arguments that you can make, etc.
Disclaimer: exclusive notion of ‘citizen’
● Importance of ‘enthymeme’
○ Technique where when you make an argument it is not fully based on logical
premises but you somehow assume that your audience already shares some
knowledge with you.
● Degree of permitted disagreement is limited
Cicero
Great orator of the Roman world
Treatises on rhetoric (ex. “De Oratore”)
4
Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:
Qualité garantie par les avis des clients
Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.
L’achat facile et rapide
Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.
Focus sur l’essentiel
Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.
Foire aux questions
Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?
Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.
Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?
Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.
Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?
Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur artspaulien. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.
Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?
Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €10,49. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.
