Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Samenvatting Engels: Cultuur en Geschiedenis (US part) €7,39   Ajouter au panier

Resume

Samenvatting Engels: Cultuur en Geschiedenis (US part)

 30 vues  2 fois vendu

Handige en overzichtelijke samenvatting van Engels: Samenleving en Cultuur. Bevat de belangrijkste aspecten van de powerpoints en mondelinge toelichtingen door de prof. Dankzij deze samenvatting een 14/20 behaald (op het cesuur-examen).

Aperçu 4 sur 35  pages

  • Non
  • Chapters to be known for exam
  • 18 décembre 2021
  • 35
  • 2021/2022
  • Resume
book image

Titre de l’ouvrage:

Auteur(s):

  • Édition:
  • ISBN:
  • Édition:
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (20)
avatar-seller
Student19567
English: culture and history

US: culture and history

US = NOT same as America
Chapters to know, not discussed in class
- Chapter 11: social services
- Chapter 12: education

LESSON 1: SETTLEMENT AND IMMIGRATION
Chapter: 3: The people – Settlement and immigration

Poem: ‘The New Colossus’ – Emma Lazarus
- America = country designed for immigrants
- Poem on statue of liberty
- To welcome all the poor and outsiders from other nations
- ‘naïve’ utopian description of a country welcomes all people that were rejected from other countries
 Trump could not Disagree more
- Today Trump policies  Biden: reverse effect on immigration = tension, stress, …
- America is not a country of infinite immigration

Early encounters between Europeans and Native Americans
- America = not an empty land when European colonists arrived
- Did not blend into a new race  ‘The American’
= ideology
- US: accidental nation, stumbled into being
- Never such a thing as a ‘single national culture’
 culturalism: people often seem to lament the loss of American identity
(“Make America Great Again” = nostalgia: America was once greater as it is now)
 presuppose a ‘lost paradise’: Americans knew who they were + not as problematic as today
(movements, ethnic groups, smaller entities)
 tone of cultural discussion today: based on false, mythical past: America used to be  never been!!

- Anglo-Americas have tried to establish a white European culture  attempted to turn America into a white
men’s paradise
- White ideology = tried to wipe out presence of native culture
- People arrived from two sides: England + Spain/Portugal
 native people lived there for thousands of years: 10 million native Americas
 Speaking several 100 languages
 Often mutual incomprehensible
 Huge culture: already there
- Confrontation with settlers (Spain and England  Natives) = extremely problematic from day one
- Conflict: European  Native Americans = tree different issues

a. HEALTH
- They made each other sick: caught diseases from each other
- Many deaths on both sides
- Immigrants: 50% died
- Native American: population 10 million  2 million
- Deadly from the beginning

b. LAND/TRADE
- Europeans and native Americans = different ideas of function of land and tray
- Europeans: land = commodity, instrument to be exploited, cultivate, try to make money from
 working on a land => it becomes yours (to sell, inherit to children, …)
 claiming more land + pushing Native Americans back into smaller pieces of land (= reservations)
- Native Americans: land = NOT a commodity
 sacred, needs to be admired, respected rather than changed
 not sell, trade, … but use for communal life + using nature to feed yourself, cure diseases but NEVER
claim it as property

c. RELIGION
- Europeans: mostly protestants: believed that nature (=wilderness)  it is God’s assignment to cultivate it
into land
Work a land, make it lucrative = please god
 believe in a personal god = who has no problem with people claiming land
 dualism
- Native Americans: land = sacred, needs to be admired, respected, … not changed
 land = great mother of nature + respect for mother nature
 believe in a divine quality that humans and nature take part off: we are all part of a huge, divine
universe: no Lord, Jesus, God in one person but land was sacred and divine just like human beings

,English: culture and history
 nature and human beings = continuum, merging into each other, …

The founders
- Two different voyages/approaches to this new world
 St. Augustin, Florida (1565) = eldest settlement
 Jamestown, Virginia (1607) = by the English
- From the very beginning: shortage of labor = inspired/forced the colonists to import African laborers
(=start of slavery)
 indentured servants: African people who came to America, willing to serve for a period of 5-7 years in
order to be free citizens after in the New World

1619: First African laborers as indentured servants


- Two types of colonists:
 separatists
 Arrived on Mayflower
 Protestant, separatist pilgrims
 Belief = people had failed + God gives Christians one more chance to establish a truly Christian
ideal world on earth
 Europe had failed to live up to God’s demand
 Separatists: turn their back on Europe for good  determined to set up an ideal, Christian culture
in the New World
 Never to return
 This escape by the separatist pilgrims= failed completely
 diseases
 ‘first immigration move’ = mythical
 FAIL
 America was NOT founded by pilgrims on the Mayflower

1620: Pilgrims, separatists on Mayflower arrive


 puritans
 Variant of same stem
 Arrived ten years later
 Ship = Arbella
 Reformers
 Did not want to turn their backs/separate from Europe
 Wanted to purify, set up an example for the Old World
 To do better
 Maybe not return physically to Europe but export their lifestyles, ideas, … to Europe
 Still today: Why do Americans think they have to mingle in e.g. Middle East? Violent moves? Police
the entire world?
 puritan origin: ‘we have to set up a religious utopia to inspire the entire world’
 Survival of mankind = high
 White America not founded by pilgrims on Mayflower (myth) but by puritans on Arbella

1630: Pilgrims, puritans on Arbella arrive



Four waves of immigration
- First wave: colonial immigrants 1680 – 1776
- Second wave: old immigrants 1820 – 1890
- Third wave: new immigrants 1890 – 1930
- Fourth wave: Latino and Asian 1965 – present

Renewed immigration debate and migration restriction
- 1890-1914: 15,5 million new immigrants

- 1875: federal government began listing ‘banned groups’
= contract laborers, convicts, prostitutes, lunatics, idiots, paupers, polygamists, political radicals, the
Chinese, the Japanese, illiterates

- 1892: Ellis Island: screening depot for immigrants

- 1908: The Melting Pot by Israel Zangwill
 play
 popularized the idea, introduced metaphor that: eventually in the US would fuse many races and
cultures (through intermarriage) and become new people, new race = Americans

,English: culture and history
to this day: notion of melting pot survived: multiculturalism  ‘I am German-American, Afro-American,
…: my ancestors are German, African, … but I am American
= hybrid, multi-layered cultural identity
= hyphenated America
Still consider, treat them as American
 ‘Make America great again’ = slogan looks backward to some kind of imaginary past were all Americans
were white, Anglo-Saxons
 melting pot = nostalgic idea of people who were never willing/able to embrace complexity of America
= America + something else (Afro-American)
 being American = ideally: not dependent on who your parents/language/religion were (Not who you used
to be) Who you decide to be = open idea

- 1921: Emergency Quota Act: each European nation = certain number of immigrant visas per year
 already 100 Belgians in US? = every new year another 3 Belgians allowed in the country
 very serious constriction
 nationality quotas 3%

- 1924: Asian Excusion Act: ended all immigrations from Asian nation
+ National Origins Quota Act: reduced European nationality quotas to 2%

- 1965: immigration Act

- 1986: immigration Reform and Control Act

- 1990: Immigration Act

2018:
 increase of immigrants in the US dropped to 70% compared to 2017


John Winthrop
- Puritan: leader of Arbella ship
- Religious people: on voyage from known to the unknown
- John W. held a speech: spoke to people on board of Arbella
- Suddenly extraordinary passage: he prepares these religious people for a class society
= what they left behind + point of voyage to create egalitarian paradisa?
 religious originis of America = offer a justification for raw capitalism
 God says: ‘some will be rich, some will be poor’
= justification of everything they left behind: not sailing into ‘socialism’ but sailing into pretty much
the same (= model of Christian charity)

Gordon Wood: What 18th century America must have felt like
Face to face society
 culture/society of very small entities, villages, communities where people knew each other personally
 biggest city back than = Philadelphia
 America = rural, agrarian, backwaters of Europe
 UK: less and less agriculture and more manufactures
 everybody knew each other
 no distinction: private – public
= huge social control: people would turn each other in
 reputation is VERY important
(people started gossiping, could destroy reputation)
 stories told not true? Brought to court => clear your name, damage of symbolic capital

Friendship
 web of social relations that linked people to one another
 not just ‘friends’ in meaning today
 friends = people in your community
 once a reputation was established (he uses cocaine, she is possessed by the devil,…) not much to do
about it or go to court

Husbandry
 to husband = verb
 to deal with scarce means in a frugal manner
 smart distributing, deal, … scarce grounds
 bad husbandry? = ‘wanbeheerr’
 deal with economic resources: bread, liquid, milk, … and use them in a wise manner
 husband: links family sphere to market sphere
 Father as a king of the family
 Husbandry = more than a family man

, English: culture and history
 difficult to have goods circulate beyond a certain sphere: primitive  no bank, stock exchange, difficult
to trade beyond village
 lack of paper money


Book accounts:
 listings that register everything people owed to one another
 complicated register
 ‘he owns me X, I own her Y, ...’
 technical term for all the economical interdependency that linked one another
 whole network
 source of conflict and social cohesion
= conflict: remind your neighbour he has to give you X back, he can’t because waiting to be paid
by Y, …= led to conflict
 social cohesion: you could not just run away  stay in same circle

Proprietary wealth
 wealthy people in town accumulated wealth: make more money than already had
 land = plenty = cheap
 wealth produced by rents, interests …
= main source of income of the rich
 network of interdependencies

Patronage
 society run by patrons
 the rich people would also be the powerful
 economic independence: only an economic independent can be a fair judge  can’t be blackmailed

 All together: small scale, agricultural, tide knit communities: no sign that seems to anticipate the formation
of a new nationstate


The war of independence

- All about money
- Story begins in 1763: end of Seven Years War: England  France
 English won the war + lot of new territory from France: Canada + Eastern Mississipi territory
 so much land so far away  how to protect it?
 financial ‘problem’ even though they had won the war

- George Grenville: chancellor in 1763
 discovered: American custom service (colonies) were costing more to operate than it was bringing in
 introduced acts (Sugar Act – 1764 and Stamp Act – 1765)
= to generate money in the colonies to fund the English bank
 levy taxes on importation of sugar (Sugar Act)
 all official documents have a particular stamp in order to be officially legal = would generate
money (Stamp Act)

- Opposition to these taxes
 new ‘tax’: Townshend Act: money that taxes raise can be invested in colonies (money goes not even
back to England)
 but no

- People started resenting from beginning: English people that lived in colonies
 colonists were not represented in parliament: no right to levitate taxes!
 how can we be taxed by a parliament in which we have no representatives?
 ‘No taxation without Representation’

- English: sent Customs Commisioners = were hated by the locals

- To prevent social protest: England sent 2 regiments of British Army: to teach colonists a lesson
 to make sure they would obey mother country

- Americans: demotivated the regiments = by behaving like ideal school children, lived by the rule, …
 regiments felt like they had no use

= pacifist provocation

- March 1770: English soldiers were unguarded in Custom House, Boston
 some locals started provoking the soldiers
 from out of nothing: violent confrontation between provocative colonists  military representatives

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur Student19567. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €7,39. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

80364 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€7,39  2x  vendu
  • (0)
  Ajouter