Garantie de satisfaction à 100% Disponible immédiatement après paiement En ligne et en PDF Tu n'es attaché à rien
logo-home
Samenvatting sociale deel SOTA Inequality And Social Exclusion €5,99   Ajouter au panier

Resume

Samenvatting sociale deel SOTA Inequality And Social Exclusion

 76 vues  0 fois vendu

Samenvatting sociale deel SOTA Inequality And Social Exclusion - slides + eigen notities

Aperçu 4 sur 56  pages

  • 1 mars 2021
  • 56
  • 2019/2020
  • Resume
Tous les documents sur ce sujet (2)
avatar-seller
ranivanderlinden
Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020
lesnotities

LES 1 ON SOCIAL EXCLUSION, INEQUALITY AND POVERTY: A CONCEPTUAL EXPLORATION
Social exclusion: a polysemic concept
History of a concept

• origins of concept in France in 1970s
• used to refer to social categories unprotected by the welfare state (low educated,…)
• social insurance against predictable risks of ‘standard’ family
→ assumptions about how people lived → in standardized families + were abled
+ had work → but not valid for everybody and those are then excluded.
• concept expanded and changed in response to social and political crises (more
categories were discovered that fell out of the welfare state (bv. migrants,
youngsters,….)
• spread across Europe from late 1980s onwards (e.g. EU policy documents)
• In 1970 highdays of the welfare state they believed that poverty would disappear →
someone noticed that despite this, there were categories that were not protected! If
you could not contribute, you were not protected.

A polysemic concept:

• Social exclusion= a polysemic concept= it has multiple meanings
• problem for comparison → bv. How many people were excluded in the 1970’s
compared to now?
• ….but also opportunity to learn about different ‘realities’
• informed by political ideologies and associated social science paradigms → bv. Marx
was a scientist but also had a political ideology.
• source to capture complexity of actually existing social exclusion

Three paradigms

• exclusion refers to changing nature of social disadvantage
→ exclusion from what? ... social order
→ different modes of social integration:
➢ externally imposed bv. The police
➢ voluntary interaction between individuals bv. In de les de prof
gehoorzamen omdat je iets wilt bijleren.
➢ national cultural and value consensus bv. Mutual respect → they are
shared and do not need to be said explicitly.
➢ … identify different causes for social exclusion
→ If you know what mode of integration is dominant in a place, you know what kind
of social exclusion there is.




1

,Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020
lesnotities

1. Solidarity paradigm

• rooted in French Republican tradition
• social integration through cultural boundaries and group solidarity
• solidarity is social bond between society and individual nurtured through a collective
conscience (=shared values) and tied together through institutions
• state (Republic) promises citizens subsistence and right to work
• in return citizens participate in work and public life
• exclusion occurs when cultural bond breaks down and individuals are no longer
morally integrated in society’s institutions.
→ Bv. In Frankrijk heftig hoofddoeken debat want hoofddoek zou aantonen dat men
niet bij de groep wilt horen. = cultural subcommunities are seen as problematic.


2. Specialisation paradigm

• associated with Anglosaxon liberalism
• social order network of voluntary exchange and association between autonomous
individuals with own interests → pursuing your self-interest → bv. Als een
hoofddoek dragen uw keuze is = oke.
• leads to specialised, interdependent and competing groups and social structures
• exclusion as discrimination; when group boundaries impede individual freedom to
participate in social exchanges. = when free choice is taken away.
• exclusion is individual process of ‘disaffiliation’ from social and economic networks
• rights to social insurance legitimated on basis of contributions made during
employment (social liberalism – social contract) = voluntary contributing is a social
contract to be protected when situations occur.


3. Monopoly paradigm

• associated with social democracy
• social order coercive, imposed through hierarchical power relations
• exclusion as result of ‘social closure’, when institutional and cultural boundaries not
only keep others out against their will but also serve to perpetuate inequality.
→ As a group, closing recources off for other people = exclusion.
→ Vb. dokwerker: they are usually male, low-skilled and white
You need to de qualified (certified), so not all people without a job can just go
work at the doks = monopolisation = exlusion
→ The only way to break through this monomolisation is with power and coercion.
• labour market segmentation bv. Males in high jobs.


Defining the concept: from social difference to social exclusion

• social exlcusion starts from social difference bv. Income, gender, age
• from social difference to social exclusion→ two general social processes:
1. hierarchisation of social positions → bv. Male more important then female,…
2. development of fault lines → segregation bv. In bathrooms, gay bars,..

2

,Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020
lesnotities

and … poverty (= a specific part of social exclusion)
→ but a social difference can also be irrelevant to exlcusion such as eye color.

Fault lines?
= fault lines are gaps or ‘sudden discontinuities’
→ different types of fault lines:
o social-relational fault lines, e.g. isolation from
certain social networks
o social-economic fault lines, e.g. segmentation of
labour markets
o spatial fault lines, e.g. ghetto’s, gated communities,
low mobility, core-periphery
o institutional fault lines, e.g. lack of accessibility to certain institutions
o cultural fault lines, e.g. ethnic-cultural boundaries between groups


Social differentiation

• No hierarchical ordering of social positions, no fault lines (eye color)
• infinite differentiation, most of which does not acquire socially significance
• social differentiation does not automatically lead to social inequality

Social fragmentation
Non-hierarchical relations, but fault lines
→ Examples:
o ‘Genuine’ multicultural society’
o Polycentric city
o Subcultures

Social inequality

• Hierarchical relations but no fault lines
• Differential access to valued resources
• Main parameters:
o overall amount of inequality
o rigidity
o ascription (vs achievement)
o crystallization




3

, Social exclusion (sociologische deel) 2019-2020
lesnotities

Social exclusion

• Hierarchical organisation of social positions and separation by fault lines
→ social exclusion seen from different paradigms:
o solidarity paradigm: from shared culture and norms, embodied in public
institutions – stresses fault lines and may even establish cultural hierarchies
o monopoly paradigm: from access to valuable resources and political rights,
through social closure– stresses hierarchical organisation of social positions
and fault lines
o specialisation paradigm: from freely entering in relationship with people or
becoming member of social group– stresses illegitimate effect of hierarchies,
but does not question fault lines (if result of free choice)

• social exclusion according to monopoly: paradigm closest to mainstream in social
stratification, i.e. sociological approach of inequality = closest to sociology.
→ Many sociologists attentive to role of structural power in society and how it plays
out in multiple societal domains (social, cultural, economic and political sphere).
→ Social inequality takes on a group form (e.g. class, gender, ethnicity, etc.).
→No seamless and continuous distribution of incomes but ‘institutionalized groups’
with pre-packaged combinations of valued goods.


Poverty
Defining poverty as a form of social exclusion




→ no mention of income in this definition!
→ People are poor when they are excluded on several points in their life
→ Relationship between the poor and the rest of society
→ Structural intervention is needed bv. Minimun income.




4

Les avantages d'acheter des résumés chez Stuvia:

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Qualité garantie par les avis des clients

Les clients de Stuvia ont évalués plus de 700 000 résumés. C'est comme ça que vous savez que vous achetez les meilleurs documents.

L’achat facile et rapide

L’achat facile et rapide

Vous pouvez payer rapidement avec iDeal, carte de crédit ou Stuvia-crédit pour les résumés. Il n'y a pas d'adhésion nécessaire.

Focus sur l’essentiel

Focus sur l’essentiel

Vos camarades écrivent eux-mêmes les notes d’étude, c’est pourquoi les documents sont toujours fiables et à jour. Cela garantit que vous arrivez rapidement au coeur du matériel.

Foire aux questions

Qu'est-ce que j'obtiens en achetant ce document ?

Vous obtenez un PDF, disponible immédiatement après votre achat. Le document acheté est accessible à tout moment, n'importe où et indéfiniment via votre profil.

Garantie de remboursement : comment ça marche ?

Notre garantie de satisfaction garantit que vous trouverez toujours un document d'étude qui vous convient. Vous remplissez un formulaire et notre équipe du service client s'occupe du reste.

Auprès de qui est-ce que j'achète ce résumé ?

Stuvia est une place de marché. Alors, vous n'achetez donc pas ce document chez nous, mais auprès du vendeur ranivanderlinden. Stuvia facilite les paiements au vendeur.

Est-ce que j'aurai un abonnement?

Non, vous n'achetez ce résumé que pour €5,99. Vous n'êtes lié à rien après votre achat.

Peut-on faire confiance à Stuvia ?

4.6 étoiles sur Google & Trustpilot (+1000 avis)

80467 résumés ont été vendus ces 30 derniers jours

Fondée en 2010, la référence pour acheter des résumés depuis déjà 14 ans

Commencez à vendre!
€5,99
  • (0)
  Ajouter