Summary
Summary Company Law UoN - Fraudulent & Wrongful Trading
- Course
- Institution
These are summarise, exam-ready revision notes on Company Law
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
dilaradevin
Content preview
Veil-Piercing1. General Principles:
a. Ignoring the company’s separate legal personality
b. This does not necessarily mean that limited liability will also be overridden
(Re FG (Films))
c. No veil-piercing where corporate structure was used to evade such rights as
third parties may in future acquire (Adams and VTB Capital)
d. Can pierce veil so as to identify the activities and assets of the corporate
respondents (Wood v Baker)
2. Leading case about corporate veil-piercing (Adams)
a. Single Economic Unit
i. Accepted as general accounts, balance sheets and profit and loss
accounts were treated together (DHN Foods)
o DHN had sufficient interest in the land to justify payment of
compensation:
a. Irrevocable license to occupy and equitable interest via
subsidiary on trust for DHN
o Upadhyay: So, the doctrine is unnecessarily invoked since
other grounds are viable
ii. Did not accept this argument (Woolfson)
iii. ‘We are not concerned with economics but with law’ (Karoon)
iv. ‘Forms no part of English law’ (Linsen International)
v. This would be a new exception to the Salomon Principle (Ord)
vi. A contract in restraint of trade was construed as applying to the
holding company as well as the subsidiaries since the holding
company’s business was handled by its subsidiaries somewhat, had a
real interest in protecting their businesses (Beckett Investment)
vii. Achieving Justice
viii. Court will pierce the veil to achieve justice (Re a Company)
ix. Accords ‘common sense and justice’ (Conway v Ratiu)
x. This argument was rejected (VTB Capital)
b. Sham/Mere façade
i. Accepts ‘mere façade concealing the true facts’ (Woolfson, Adams,
VTB Capital)
ii. Upadhyay:
o ‘Evasion principle’ is less vague/clearer than ‘sham’
o Confusing term as the company itself is not a sham but a
properly incorporated legal entity.
o Issue is that a properly incorporated legal entity is being used
to wrongfully avoid a liability or confer an advantage where it
is not due
c. Agency Law
i. No presumption simply because ownership and control are within a
single individual and must prove on facts (Adams)
3. Limitation of doctrine leading case (Prest)
1
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller dilaradevin. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $4.55. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
78252 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now