100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources $14.50   Add to cart

Other

PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion; Evaluating Sources

 109 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Required Resources Read/review the following resources for this activity: • Textbook: Chapter 6, 7 • Lesson • Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook) Introduction "Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts." (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in V...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • January 1, 2021
  • 4
  • 2020/2021
  • Other
  • Unknown
avatar-seller
PHIL 347 Week 3 Discussion: Evaluating Sources
Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:
 Textbook: Chapter 6, 7
 Lesson
 Minimum of 1 scholarly source (in addition to the textbook)

Introduction
"Everyone is entitled to their own opinions – but not their own facts." (Daniel Patrick Moynihan, cited in Vanity
Fair, 2010, para. 2)

We form opinions – and make our judgments – based on facts we observe and values we hold. Our judgments are
also influenced by the opinions of others. In the section "An Expert on Hate in America" in Chapter 6, one of the
authors, Dr. Peter Facione, renders an opinion on a non-profit civil rights organization: Southern Poverty Law
Center (SPLC). Dr. Facione is a leading advocate and one of the most influential voices in the field of critical
thinking.

His endorsement of the civil rights organization is unqualified. It is also transparent: Dr. Facione reveals that he is a
financial supporter of the organization and has arranged speaking engagements for its founder. This is Dr. Facione's
invitation to you, the reader:

Knowing where you can learn more about the SPLC for yourself, and knowing about Dr. Facione's endorsement and
support of the Center's work, evaluate this claim made by Dr. Facione: "The SPLC is an expert on hate in America"
(p. 124).

The endorsement of the SPLC is contained in the most current edition of the text, whose copyright date is 2016.
Since that time Morris Dees, co-founder and former chief trial counsel, has been fired (Hassan, Zraick & Blinder,
2019). Previously, there has been controversy about groups and individuals that are listed by the SPLC as "hate
groups" (Graham, 2016; Price, 2018). The organization, which has nearly a half-billion dollars in assets, has also
been criticized for how it spends these funds (Robinson, 2019).

Self Assessment Questions
Before you submit your initial post, make sure to read the assigned chapter. Then, ask yourself the following: Did
the article in Chapter 6 of the text seem credible and reliable? Why? Be very specific:
 Was it because it is in a textbook?
 Because it was written by a learned and respected person?
 Because of content in the article?
 Because of your previous knowledge of the SPLC?

Initial Post Instructions
For the initial post, address the following:
 Conduct additional research on the SPLC. Did your opinion alter in any way? Why?
Only after you have done some responsible research should you begin to respond to the discussion prompt. The
discussion is not about the SPLC; it is not about Dr. Facione. It is about what you have learned about forming
opinions. Your post must answer this question:
 How do you define the term "expert"?
Your post must also discuss at least two (2) of the following questions:
 How important are facts in the process of forming an opinion? Explain what you believe to be the purpose
or function of facts in making a judgment.
 How did you respond to the self-assessment question? Since doing further research, have you re-thought
the way in which you assess credibility and reliability? What is the importance of factoring the recency of a
reference or opinion (i.e., how old is it?) into an assessment of credibility and reliability?
 How would you evaluate Dr. Facione's claim "The SPLC is an expert on hate in America" (p. 124). Does
the SPLC fit your definition of "expert"? Be specific in your answer.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Milestonee. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76658 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.50
  • (0)
  Add to cart