100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
HFL1501 PORTFOLIO (sem2,2020) distinction guaranteed! $4.71   Add to cart

Answers

HFL1501 PORTFOLIO (sem2,2020) distinction guaranteed!

4 reviews
 1442 views  26 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution

Suggested answers for HFL1501 Portfolio Semester 2 - 2020 Covered the entire portfolio. 100% Pass guaranteed !

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • November 22, 2020
  • 7
  • 2020/2021
  • Answers
  • Unknown

4  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: dylanvw09dvw • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: mrarimetsism • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: vonganimufamadi • 3 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: ColeNicole • 3 year ago

avatar-seller
HFL1501
Portfolio
Semester 2
2020
Simple law @ Stuvia

, PART 1

QUESTION 1:

During the colonial period, there’s a policy that was followed
that did not give recognition of Indigenous law. In those
instances where indigenous law was recognised, it was
subject to the strict application of a repugnancy clause,
which determined that indigenous law would apply only in
as far as it was not contrary to the Western notion of public
policy and natural justice. This notion was referred to as
“repugnancy clause”.
Indigenous African law is still subject to a repugnancy
clause. The repugnancy clause was originally introduced
during the colonial period when the Cape was under British
rule. The administrator’s only recognised indigenous African
law in as far as it was not contrary to the Western notion of
public policy and natural justice. The repugnancy clause
was later inserted into the Black Administration Act 38 of
1927. Today, the repugnancy clause is contained in the
Law of Evidence Amendment Act 45 of 1988. Section 1(1)
of this Act provides that:
Any court may take judicial notice of the law of a foreign
state and of indigenous law in so far as such law can be
ascertained readily and with sufficient certainty: Provided
that indigenous law shall not be opposed to the principles of
public policy and natural justice: Provided further that it
shall not be lawful for any court to declare that the custom
of lobola or bogadi or other similar custom is repugnant to
such principles.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Simplelaw. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.71. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.71  26x  sold
  • (4)
  Add to cart