100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Solution Manual For Intermediate Statistical Investigations 1th Edition by Nathan Tintle, Beth L. Chance, Karen Mc Gaughey, Soma Roy, Todd Swanson, Jill Vander Stoep Chapter 1-6 $17.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Solution Manual For Intermediate Statistical Investigations 1th Edition by Nathan Tintle, Beth L. Chance, Karen Mc Gaughey, Soma Roy, Todd Swanson, Jill Vander Stoep Chapter 1-6

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Intermediate Statistical
  • Institution
  • Intermediate Statistical

Solution Manual For Intermediate Statistical Investigations 1th Edition by Nathan Tintle, Beth L. Chance, Karen McGaughey, Soma Roy, Todd Swanson, Jill Vander Stoep Chapter 1-6

Preview 4 out of 131  pages

  • November 13, 2024
  • 131
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Intermediate Statistical
  • Intermediate Statistical
avatar-seller
professoraxel
CHAPTER 1 i




SourcesofVariation i i




Sectioni1.1 1.1.10iColoriofiaisigniisitheiexplanatoryivariableiwithiwhite,iyellow,ian
diredibeingitheilevels.
1.1.1 B.
1.1.11
1.1.2 Bi&iC.
1.1.3 A. ObservediVariatio Sourcesiofi Sourcesiofiu
1.1.4 C. niin: explainedi nexplainediv
1.1.5 E. f.iwhetheritheistudenti variation ariation
obeyeditheisign
1.1.6 B.
60.34iifi rigidilibrarian Inclusionicriteria a.icoloriofithei b.iwhetheritheisubjecti
1.1.7 predictedinumberi ofi usesi foriitemsi =
{ 92.19iifi eccentricipoet sign wasileft-
• c.itimeiofiday
1.1.8 handedioriright-
• e.iageiofisubject handed
a. Theiinclusionicriteriaiareihavingiaiclinicalidiagnosisiofimilditoimoder
d.iattitudeiofistudent
ateidepressioniwithoutianyitreatmentifouriweeksiprioriandiduringithei
study. e.iageiofisubject
1.1.12
b. Theipurposeiofirandomlyiassigningisubjectsitoitheigroupsiisitoim
akeigroupsiveryisimilariexceptiforitheioneivariablei(swimmingiwithido a. Theivaluei6.21irepresentsitheioverallimeaniquiziscore,i5.50irepresentsi
lphinsiorinot)ithatitheiresearchersiimpose.iVolunteeringiforiaigroupico thei groupi meani quizi scorei fori peoplei whoi usedi computeri notes,i and
uldiintroduceiaiconfoundingivariable. 6.92irepresentsitheigroupimeaniscoreiforipeopleiwhoiusedipaperinotes.
c. Itiwasiimportantithatitheisubjects iinitheicontroligroupiswimieveryi b. Weilookitoiseeihowifari6.92iandi5.50iareifromioneianotheriorifromi
dayiwithoutidolphinsisoithatithisicontroligroupidoesieverythingi(in- theioverallimeaniofi6.21itoidetermineiwhetheritheinote-
icludingiswimming) ithatitheiexperimentaligroupidoesiexceptithatiw takingimethodimightiaffectitheiscore.
henitheyiswimitheyidon’tidoiitiinitheipresenceiofidolphins.iWithoutith c. Theinumberi1.76irepresentsitheitypicalideviationiofi aniobserva-
isiweiwouldn’tiknowiwhetherijustiswimmingicausesitheidifferencei ni itionifromitheiexpectedivalue,iinithisicase,ifromitheioverallimean.iThein
theireductioniofi depressionisymptoms. umberi1.61irepresentsitheitypicalideviationiofianiobservationiaftericre
d. Yes,ithisiisianiexperimentibecauseitheisubjectsiwereirandomlyias- atingiaimodelithatitakesiintoiaccountiwhetheritheipersoniisiusingicomp
isigneditoitheitwoigroups. uterioripaperinotes.

1.1.9. d. Becauseitheistandardideviationiofitheiresidualsirepresentsitheileft-
ioverivariation,iweicaniseeithatiafteriincludingitheitypeiofinotesiasiani
Observedi variationi Sourcesiofi Sourcesiofiu explanatoryivariableiiniourimodelitheiunexplainedivariationihasibeeni
n: explainedi nexplainediv reducedi(downitoi1.61ifromi1.76).iThisitellsiusithatiknowingitheitypei
d.isubstantialireductioni variation ariation ofinote-takingimethodienablesiusitoibetteripredictiscores.
inidepressionisymptoms 1.1.13iRandomiassignmentishouldimakeitheitwoiigroupsiiveryisimila
riwithiregarditoivariablesilikeiintelligence,ipreviousiknowl-
Inclusionicriteria a.iswimmingiwithi • g.iproblemsiinithei iedge,iorianyiotherivariableiandithusilikelyieliminateipossibleiconfo
• b.imilditoimoderate dolphinsiorinot personalilivesiofit undingivariables.
depression heisubjectsiduringi
theistudy 1.1.14
• c.inoiuseiofiantidepres
santidrugsioripsychot • h.iillnessiofisu a. Thisitableishowsiusipossibleiconfoundingivariablesibutithenisho
herapyifouriweeksiprio bjectsiduringith wsithatisubjectsiinitheitwoigroupsiiareiiquiteiisimilariiwithiregardito
ritoitheistudy eistudy itheseicharacteristics,ithusirulingioutitheseipossibleiconfoundingiva
Design riables.
• e.iswimming b. Weiwouldiwantitheip-
• f.istayingionianiislandi valuesi toi bei large,i soi wei couldi sayi thatiweihaveilittleitoinoievidenc
foritwoiweeksiduringi eithatithereiisiaidifferenceiinimeaniage,iproportioniofimales,ietc.ibetw
theistudy eenitheitwoigroups.iWeiwantiourigroupsitoibeiveryisimilarigoingiintoith
eistudy,isoiaicausaliconclusioniisipossi-ibleiifi wei findiai smalli p-
valueiafteri applyingi theitreatment(s).
3

,4iiii CHAPTE R i 1i i SourcesiofiVariation

1.1.15iItiisilikelyithati3-itoi5-year-oldsimightihaveidifferentipreferenc- c. R2i=i11.1328/199.62i=i0.0558.iWeicaniinterpretithisibyisayingithati5
iesiwheniiticomesitoitoyioricandyithani12-itoi14-year- .58%iofitheivariationiinitheiperceivedileveliofiriskiisiexplainedibyiwh
olds.iTheiolderigroupi isi probablyi muchi morei likelyi toi preferi thei cand etheritheinameiofi theihurricaneiisimaleiorifemale.
yi overi thei toyai ndi thei oppositei couldi bei truei withi thei youngeri group.i d.i SSErrori=i199.62i−i11.13i=i188.49.
Wei wouldi not
seeithisidifferenceiifi theiresultsiofi allitheiagesiareicombineditogether. i
e. √ 188.4872/140i =i1.16.
0.28i ifimaleiname
Sectioni1.2 f.ii predictedihurricaneiriskiratingi=i5.29i+
{−0.28iififemaleinameii
,
1.2.1 B. SEiofiresidualsi=i1.16.
1.2.2 A,iD. 1.2.16
1.2.3 C. a. Theiexplanatoryivariableiisitheinote-takingimethodianditheire-
isponseivariableiisitheiquiziscore.
1.2.4 A.
b. Theieffectiofitakinginotesionipaperiisi0.71ianditheieffectiofitakingin
1.2.5 C.
otesionitheicomputeriisi−0.71.
1.2.6 D.
c.i SSModeli=i40i×i(0.712)i=i20.164.
1.2.7 B.
d.iR2i=i20.164/120.92i=i0.16675.iWeicaniinterpretiitibyisayingithati
1.2.8 Usingitheieffectsimodel,ibecausei4.48i+i0.65i=i5.13i(theimeani
16.675%iofitheivariationiofiquiziscoreiisiexplainedibyitheinote-
ofitheiscentigroup)iandi4.48i−i0.65i=i3.83i(theimeaniofitheinon-
takingimethod.
scentigroup),itheimodelsiareiequivalent.
1.2.9 e.i 120.92i–i20.164i=i100.756.

a. SSModel. f.ii √100.756/38i =i1.628. 0.71iifi usingipaperinotes
g.ii predictediquiziscorei=i6.21i+i .
b. SSError. {−0.71iifiusingicomputerinotesi
1.2.17
1.2.10
a. Becausei thei samplei sizesi ofi eachi groupi arei thei same,i thei samplei
a. R2i =iSSModel/SSTotali=i0.4651. sizeiofi eachigroupiisijustihalfi ofi theitotalisampleisize.
b. R2i =i1i−iSSError/SSTotali=i0.7111. ∑ (xi −ix)2 ∑ (yi −iy)2

1.2.11 b. allin
obsiiiiii
_i −i1 + alli_ iiiiii
nobsi − _1
( 2
yi −iy)
i1
a.i 8. ∑2 xi −ixi 2i +i∑ 2 i2

b.i 6i–i8i=i–2,i10i–i8i=i2. = alliobs(i i )̅
ni −i1
alliobs(i i ̅) 1
_
( _
2 )2
c.ii74. ∑alliobs(xii −i x̅)2i +i∑alliobs(yii −i y̅)2
d.i 40. =( )
ni−i2
e.ii34.
f.i 0.5405. Takingitheisquareirootiweigeti
⎛i∑
√ ∑ alliobs (x ii −i x̅) 2i +i∑ alliobs (yii −i y̅) 2
ni−i2
̅ 2 i∑ (y ii −i y̅ )ii2⎞
i n(x ii −i x)iii
1.2.12 n

a. Thei explanatoryi variablei isi thei typei ofi testingi environment;i it Useisumifromi1itoin:i 1 ⎜ +i ⎟
isicategorical. 2iii=1 n −i1
_ i=1i
⎝ ni −i1iiii
b. Theiresponseivariableiisitheitestiscore;iitiisiquantitative. 2 ⎞ n 2 2 n⎠
⎛i n 2 n 2 2
i∑ (x ii−i x̅)iii+i ∑ (y ii−i y̅)ii i∑ (x ii−i x̅)iii+i ∑ (y ii−i y̅)ii
c. Theitwoilevelsiareiquietienvironmentiandidistractingienvironment.
2

=i _1iii=1 i=1 ⎟
i=i i=1
ni−i2
i=1
1.2.13 ⎝ n —i1 ⎠
2 i
a. SSTotali wouldi probablyi bei largeri withi thesei 10i subjectsi because n 2 n 2



i∑(xii−i x)iii
̅ +i ∑(yii−i y)ii̅
withitheiwideivarietyiofiagesithereiwouldiprobablyibeimoreivariabilityii i=1 i=1
Takingi thei squarei root,i wei get n —i2 .
nitheitestiscores.
b. SSModeliwouldiprobablyibeitheisameibecauseiitiwouldistillirepre-
isentitheidifferenceibetweenitestingienvironments. Sectioni1.3
c. SSErrori wouldi probablyi bei largeri becausei therei wouldi probablyi 1.3.1 D.
beimoreivariabilityiinitheitestiscoresiwithinieachigroupidueitoitheivaria 1.3.2 A.
bilityiiniages.
1.3.3 D.
1.2.14 Thei variancei ofi thei scoresi ini thei distractingi environmenti isi 2.5
1.3.4 A.
anditheivarianceiofi theiscoresiinitheidistractingienviro_ nmentiisi6.iThe
squareirootiofi theiaverageiofi theseitwoivariancesiisi√4.2_ 5i =i2.06.iThe 1.3.5 A.
SSErroriisi34,isoitheistandardierroriofitheiresiduals iisi√34/8i =i2.06. 1.3.6 Theivalidityiconditionsiareinotimetibecauseitheimaleisampleis
1.2.15 izeiisismallianditheidistributioniofitheinumberiofiflip-
flopsiownedibyitheimalesiisiquiteiskeweditoitheiright.
a. Theiexplanatoryivariablyiisiwhetheritheinameiofi theihurricaneiisi
maleiorifemaleianditheiresponseiisitheiperceivediriskilevel. 1.3.7ii
b. Thei effecti ofi namingi thei hurricanei Christinai isi 5.01i −i 5.29i = a.iii √(24.i382i +i 36.i992)/2i =i 31.33.
−0.28iandithei effecti ofi namingithei hurricanei Christopheri isi5.57i −i5 92.16i−i60.34
b.i ti= =i 4.06.
.29i=i0.28.iTheiSSModeliisi142(0.282)i=i11.1328. 31.33i√1/32i +i 1/32

, SolutionsitoiExercisesi 5

c. Yes,ithereiisistrongievidenceithatiaverageicreativityiisidifferentib 1.3.14
e-itweeni“rigidilibrarians”iandi“eccentricipoets”ibecauseitheit- a. Theipaperimethodimeaniisi6.92ipointsianditheicomputerimetho
statisticiisilargerithani2. dimeaniisi5.50ipoints,isoitheipaperimethoditendsitoigiveiaihigherisc
1.3.8ii ore.

a.i √(24.242i +i38.782)/2i =i32.34. −0.71iificomputeri
b. predictediquiziscorei=i6.21i+iiii ,
b.i ti=iiii 69.97i−i85.71iiiii =i−1.69. {i0.71iifipaper
32.34√1/24i+i1/24
c.i Thereiisinotistrongievidenceithatitheiaverageicreativityimeasur SEiofiresidualsi=i1.63.
e
isidifferentibetweenibiologyianditheaterimajorsibecauseitheiabsolutei c. Letiμcomputeribeitheipopulationiquiziscoreiwheninotesiareitakeni
valueiofitheit-statisticiisilargerithani2. usingiaicomputer,iandisimilarlyiforiμpaper.iTheihypothesesiareiH0:
iμcomputeri−iμpaperi=i0,ithatiis,itheilong-
1.3.9i Yes,ithereiisistrongievidenceithatitheilong- runimeaniscoresiwillibeitheisameiforibothimethodsiofinoteitakingivs.
runiaverageigameidu- iHa:iμcomputeri−iμpaperi≠i0,ithatiis,itheimeaniscoresiwillinotibeitheisamei
irationidiffersibetweenireplacementiandiregularirefereesibecauseith foritheitwoimethodsiofinoteitaking.
eidifferenceiinimeanigameilengthiisi8.03iminutesiandithativalueiisiw
d. ti=i2.27.iBecauseithisit-
ayioutiinitheirightitailiofitheinullidistribution.
statisticiisigreaterithani2,iitiappearsithereiisiaistatisticallyisignificanti
1.3.10 differenceiinitheimeaniquiziscoresibetweenitheitwoistudyingimethod
a.ii ti=iiii 196i.50i −i 188.47iiii =i2.64. s.
14.47i√1/43i+i1/48
e. Theit-statisticiisifariinitheirightitailiofitheinullidistribution.
b.iYes,ithereiisistrongievidenceithatitheilong-
runiaverageigameidu- f. Simulation-basedip-valuei≈i0.006;itheory-basedip-valuei=i0.0086.
irationidiffersibetweenireplacementiandiregularirefereesibecauseith g. Weihaveiveryistrongievidenceithatithereiisiaidifferenceiinitheimea
eit-statisticiisilargerithani2. niscoresionithisiquizibetweenitakinginotesionicomputeriandipaper,iw
1.3.11 ithitheipaperimethodihavingiaihigherimeaniscoreiinitheilongirun.
a. Weiwouldineedi10icards. 1.3.15
b. Weiwouldiwriteithei10iscoresionitheicards. a. Weiarei95%iconfidentithatitheimeaniscoreiforitheipaperinote-
c. Afteritheicardsiareishuffled,irandomlyisortithemiinitwoipilesiofi takingimethodiisibetweeni0.3832itoi2.4668ipointsihigherithanitheic
5,ilabelingioneipileiDianditheiotheripileiQ.iCalculateitheimeaniofi omputerinote-takingimethodiinitheilongirun.
theinumbersionitheicardsiinieachipileiandifindiandirecorditheidiffe b. Yes.iBecauseitheiintervaliisicompletelyipositiveiweihaveievidenc
rencei nimeansi(e.g.,iDi−iQ).iRepeatithisiprocessimany,imanyitimesi eithatiinitheilongirunitheipaper-
toicon-istructiainullidistributioniofitheidifferenceiinimeans. basedimethodipopulationimeaniisilarg-ierithanitheicomputer-
1.3.12 basedimethodipopulationimean.
a. Christopheri meani x̅Christopheri =i 5.57,i Christinai meani x̅Christina 1.3.16
i =i5.01,isoiChristopheritendsitoibeiperceivediasitheiriskieriname. a.iLetiμMusicYesibeitheipopulationimemoryiscoreiwhenipeopleiareil
b. predictedihurricaneirisk isteningi toi musici andi similarlyi fori μMusicNo.i Thei hypothesesi ar
eiH0:iμMusicYesi−iμMusicNoi=i0,ithatiis,imeanimemoryiscoresiwillibei
the
−0.28iifi Christina sameiregardlessiofiwhetheriorinotipeopleiareilisteningitoimusiciver
=i5.29i+ {i 0.28iifiChristopher ,iSEiofiresidualsi =i1.16. -
isusiHA:iμMusicYesi−iμMusicNoi<i0,ithatiis,imeanimemoryiscoresiwilli
be
theiloweriforipeopleiwhoiareilisteningitoimusicicompareditoithose
c. LetiμChristopher beitheipopulationiaverageiriskiratingiforihurricane whoiaren’t.
s
givenitheinameiChristopher,iandisimilarlyiforiμChristina.iTheihypoth a. Weiarei95%iconfidentithatitheimeaniperceivedithreatiratingifo
-
ritheinameiChristopheriisibetweeni0.1747iandi0.9450ipointsihi
iesesiareiH0:iμChristopheri−iμChristinai=i0,ithatiis,imeaniperceivediriski
gherithanithatiforitheinameiChristina,iinitheilongirun.
ratingsiareitheisameiregardlessiofiwhetheritheihurricaneiisinamed
iChristopherioriChristinainameiversusiHA:iμChristopheri−iμChristinai≠i b. Yes,ibecauseitheientireiintervali(foriChristopheriminusiChristi
0,ithatiis,imeaniperceivediriskiratingsidifferibasedioniwhetheritheihur na)iisipositiveiitishowsitheiobservedimeaniratingiforiChristopheri
ri-icaneiisinamed iChristopherioriChristina. isistatis-iticallyisignificantlyilargerithanithatiforiChristina.
d. Theiappletishowsiti=i2.87.iBecauseitheit-
statisticiisigreaterithani2,iitilooksilikeitheidifferenceiiniobservedimea
niperceivediriskiratingsiisistatisticallyisignificant.
e. Theit-
statisticiisifariioutiiiniitheiirightiitailiiofiitheiisimulated inullidistri
bution.
f. simulationip-valuei≈i0.006;itheoryip-valuei=i0.0048.
g. Weihaveiveryistrongievidenceithatitheiperceivedihurricaneithrea
tiforitheinameiChristopheriisidifferenti(moreispecifically,ilarger)ith
anitheiperceived ihurricaneithreatiforitheinameiChristina.
1.3.13

, b. Thereiisiailotiofioverlapibetweenitheidistributioniofitheiscoresibe-
itweenitheitwoigroups.iItilooksilikeitheidifferenceiinisampleimeansi
6i might inotibei1i
CHAPTERi significant.
i SourcesiofiVariation
c. ti=i–
1.28.iWithi|t|i<i2,ithereidoesinotiappearitoibeiaistatisticallyisignifica
ntidifferenceiinitheimeaniscoresibetweenitheitwoigroups.
d. Theit-statisticiisinotiinitheitailiofitheidistribution.
e. Simulation-basedip-valuei≈i0.111;iTheory-basedip-valuei=i0.1046.
f. Weidoinotihaveistrongievidenceithatilisteningitoimusicitendsitoih
inderipeople’siabilitiesitoimemorizeiwords.
1.3.17
a. Whereasit-
statisticsiandidifferencesiinimeansicanibeipositiveiorinegative,i thei valu
esi ofi R2i arei neveri negative.i Thei largeri thei valueiofiR2,itheibiggerithe
idifferenceibetweeniitheiitwoiisamples.iThere-
ifore,iwheniweiwantitoifindiR2ivaluesithatiareiasiextremeiasiouriobserve
d,i wei alwaysi looki ati thosei thati arei equali toi ori largeri thanitheiobser
vediR2.

b. UsingiR2iasitheistatisticiautomaticallyidoesiaitwo-
sideditestievenithoughiweiareilookingijustiinioneidirection.iTherefore
,itheip-
valueiisiaboutitwiceiasilargeiasiitishouldibeiforitestingiwhetherimusi
citendsitoihinderipeople’siabilityitoimemorize,iandiweishouldidividei
itibyi2.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller professoraxel. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $17.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

80796 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$17.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart