100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
JOMC 486 Mass Media Law - Final Exam with 100- correct answers $14.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

JOMC 486 Mass Media Law - Final Exam with 100- correct answers

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • JOMC 101
  • Institution
  • JOMC 101

JOMC 486 Mass Media Law - Final Exam with 100- correct answers

Preview 2 out of 9  pages

  • October 28, 2024
  • 9
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • JOMC 101
  • JOMC 101
avatar-seller
GUARANTEEDSUCCESS
JOMC 486 | Mass Media Law -
Final Exam with 100%
correct answers
FTC policy on deceptive advertising: - answer 1. There must be a
representation, omission, or practice that is likely to mislead the
consumer
2. The act or practice must be considered from the perspective of a
reasonable person
3. The deception must be material


McNeil v. Pfizer - answer A company launched an advertising campaign
for Listerine Mouthwash, in which it was implied that listerine is as
effective at fighting plaque and gingivitis as floss. A competing floss
company sued for false advertising in violation of the Lanham act, and
unfair competition in violation of state law. Judge recognized floss
company's claim of literal falsity and on its implied falsity claim. In the
end, Listerine ads could still use their studies to support the claim that
their product fights plaque and gingivitis, as long as it does not invoke a
comparison to floss (name the case)


4 areas of concern in deceptive advertising - answer 1. the use of mock-
ups (fake versions of the product) in advertisements
2. substantiation of advertising claims
3. price claims and bait advertising
4. use of endorsements


FTC on substantiation - answer Advertisers must have a reasonable-basis
for the claims before including them in advertisements


First amendment protection for advertising: - answer Used to be
assumed ads didn't have 1st amendment protection, until the central
hudson test

, Central Hudson Test for first amendment in ads - answer 1. Is the
commercial speech for a lawful activity and not misleading?
2. Does the government assert a substantial interest to justify the
regulation?
3. Does the regulation directly advance the government's substantial
interest?
4. Is the regulation no more extensive than necessary to serve the
government's interest?


Indecency - answer Language or material that, in context, depicts or
describes, in terms patently offensive (that's it) as measured by
contemporary community standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or
excretory activities or organs.


becker v. fcc - answer Plaintiff and the Washington Area Citizens
Coalition Interested in Viewers' Constitutional Rights filed suit against the
defendant involving two sections of the Communications Act of 1934. This
challenged the defendant's interpretation of its powers under the Act in
denying plaintiff access to prime time broadcasting slots for his political
commercials. The Act requires broadcasters to provide candidates for
federal office with "reasonable access" to the broadcast media. The United
States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia held that the initial
ruling of the defendants violated the "reasonable access." The court of
appeals found the defendants ruling also was violating the "no
censorship" and "equal opportunities" provisions because it permitted
licensees to discriminate against candidates based on the content of the
message of the advertisement.


equal opportunity rule - answer "If any licensee shall permit any person
who is a legally qualified candidate for any public office to use a
broadcasting station, he shall afford equal opportunities to all other such
candidates for that office in the use of such broadcasting station . . . ."


exceptions to the equal opportunity rule - answer Can't interrupt:
Bona fide newscasts.
Bona fide news interviews.
On-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GUARANTEEDSUCCESS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83637 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$14.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart