100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Con Rights and Libs Rosenberger v UVA Study Review Test. $11.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Con Rights and Libs Rosenberger v UVA Study Review Test.

 0 view  0 purchase

Con Rights and Libs Rosenberger v UVA Study Review Test. Who: - CORRECT ANSWER Ronald Rosenberger, a member of a recognized organization of Christian students at the University of Virginia. Rosenberger v UVA 515 US 819 (1995) - CORRECT ANSWER public funds and religion What - CORRECT ANSWE...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • October 17, 2024
  • 1
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (13)
avatar-seller
ROSEGRADES
Con Rights and Libs Rosenberger v UVA
Study Review Test.
Who: - CORRECT ANSWER Ronald Rosenberger, a member of a recognized organization of Christian
students at the University of Virginia.



Rosenberger v UVA

515 US 819 (1995) - CORRECT ANSWER public funds and religion



What - CORRECT ANSWER objected to a denial of student activity funds to support the printing of the
group's newspaper, Wide Awake: A Christian Perspective at the University of Virginia.



Why? - CORRECT ANSWER Other student groups received funding to support their publications, but the
university's rules prohibited support for religious activities.



Issue - CORRECT ANSWER Did the University of Virginia violate the First Amendment rights of its
Christian magazine staff by denying them the same funding resources that it made available to secular
student-run magazines?



Supreme court ruled: - CORRECT ANSWER in favor of Rosenberger.



Justice Kennedy, writing for the Court: - CORRECT ANSWER found the university's policies to be an
unconstitutional form of "viewpoint discrimination." He explained that "it does not violate the
Establishment Clause for a public university to grant access to its facilities on a religion-neutral basis to a
wide spectrum of student groups."



Belief of the court. - CORRECT ANSWER In order for the University to ban speech, the court ruled that
the university was required to scrutinize all student speech to ensure that it did not contain excessively
religious content.

It must promote all forms of speech equally.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ROSEGRADES. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79835 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart