100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NURS 5366 Research Article Appraisal Part Two | University of Texas, Arlington $18.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NURS 5366 Research Article Appraisal Part Two | University of Texas, Arlington

 58 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • NURS 5366
  • Institution
  • NURS 5366

NURS 5366 Principles of Research in Nursing | NURS 5366 Research Article Appraisal Part Two - University of Texas, Arlington

Preview 3 out of 17  pages

  • October 16, 2024
  • 17
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • nurs 5366
  • NURS 5366
  • NURS 5366
avatar-seller
Jumuja
Research Article Appraisal, Part Two




Legal & Ethical Issues


1. Briefly discuss institutional review board approval for the study.

The study was approved by the Yale University Human Investigations Committee and the

institutional review board of the FQHC. Healthcare professionals participating in the

study completed a written consent form. Patient participants provided verbal consent at

the time of survey administration (Nembhard et al., 2020, p. 12).



2. Explain how ethical principles of research (beneficence/harm, justice, privacy, and

autonomy) were followed to protect subjects if that was explained or implied.

The principle of autonomy was implied as the participants could choose if they did or did

not want to be a part of the study and had the right to leave the study at any time.



3. If the study included subjects from a vulnerable population as described in the

textbook, describe any additional safeguards used to protect them.

The study included subjects from community health centers that serve socioeconomically

disadvantaged patients. No additional safeguards to protect these patients were noted in

the study.

, Measurement Tools


Fill out the table below for the major variables in the study (NOT demographic variables).

You can add rows as needed, depending on how many measurement tools were used. Boxes

can be expanded for more content.


Name of Tool Level of Reliability Validity

(Author, year) Measurement reported reported
CG-CAHPS Survey The study measures the CG-CAHPS survey According to

Tool used to measure dependent variable of answers were averaged Nembhard et al.

the dependent variable the patient care in each composite and (2020), the CG-

of the patient care experience using the were determined to be CAHPS survey has

experience. ordinal level of highly correlated (p- been used in other

(Crofton et al., 1999) measurement. values < 0.001); the studies of care

average of the four coordination, and

composite scores was the sites already

used to present an administer the

overall patient care surveys for

experience score for performance

each patient monitoring (p. 5).

(Nembhard et al.,

2020, p. 5).
PCMH supplement The study measures the PCMH supplemental According to

Item Set dependent variable of Item Set survey Nembhard et al.

Tool used to measure the patient care answers were averaged (2020), the CG-

the dependent variable experience using the in each composite and CAHPS survey has

, of the patient care ordinal level of were determined to be been used in other

experience. measurement. highly correlated (p- care coordination

(Scholle et al., 2012) values < 0.001), the studies, and the

average of the four sites already

composite scores was administer the

used to present an surveys for

overall patient care performance

experience score for monitoring (p. 5).

each patient

(Nembhard et al.,

2020. p. 5).
Organizational The study measures the The average scores of According to

Assessment Survey dependent variable of the two scales were Nembhard et al.

Scales of core teamwork aspects highly correlated (p- (2020), the study

Interprofessional using an ordinal value < 0.001), authors utilized validated

Collaboration and measurement level. created a summary survey scales to

Relational teamwork score for assess core aspects

Coordination each primary care team of teamwork (p. 6).

(Actual survey name member participant

not specified) (Nembhard et al.,

2020, p. 6).
Facilitating Attributes The study measures the The reliability of the The validity of the

Scale dependent variable of scale was not noted in scale was not noted

(Venkatesh et al., nurses’ experiences the study. in the study.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Jumuja. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $18.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

71184 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$18.99  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart