100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
NR-503 Midterm exam with 5 best versions + midterm exam review $17.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

NR-503 Midterm exam with 5 best versions + midterm exam review

 6 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • NR-503
  • Institution
  • NR-503

NR-503 Midterm exam with 5 best versions + midterm exam review/NR-503 Midterm exam with 5 best versions + midterm exam review/NR-503 Midterm exam with 5 best versions + midterm exam review

Preview 4 out of 41  pages

  • October 14, 2024
  • 41
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • NR-503
  • NR-503
avatar-seller
examsetters
NR-503 Midterm
NR-503 Midterm exam with 5 best versions +
midterm exam review

NR-503 Midterm version 1
vital statistics - correct answer The collection, tabulation, and interpretation of data
concerning birth, marriage, divorce, sickness, and death.

Morbidity - correct answer presence of illness in population

mortality - correct answer related to tracking of deaths in a population

cases - correct answer people afflicted (those who are sick)

social justice - correct answer justice in terms of the distribution of wealth,
opportunities, and privileges within a society.

Epidemiology - correct answer the branch of medicine that deals with the incidence,
distribution, and possible control of diseases and other factors relating to health.

Population Health - correct answer health outcomes of a group of people, and the
distribution of those outcomes within the group

Incidence - correct answer number of new cases

Prevalence - correct answer The number or proportion of cases of a particular disease
or condition present in a population at a within a specific time frame

Outcomes - correct answer End result that follows an intervention

Inter-professional collaboration - correct answer Health professionals work together in
small groups providing care. Examples: oncology, OR, end of life or primary care.

Healthy People 2020 - correct answer A set of disease prevention and health promotion
objectives for Americans to meet during the second decade of the new millennium.

Determinants of health - correct answer Factors that raise or lower a level of health in a
population or individual. Determinants of health help to explain or predict trends in health and
why some groups have better or worse health than others.

Campaign for Action - correct answer mobilizes nurses, health providers, consumers to
strengthen nursing through policy changes. Goal based on IOM future of nursing report.

,NR-503 Midterm
primary intervention - correct answer process of altering susceptibility or reducing
exposure to prevent disease prior to the person getting it, ex: immunizations, tobacco
prevention initiatives

secondary intervention - correct answer early detection of disease or risk factors and
intervention during an asymptomatic phase, ex: pap smear, rapid HIV, annual cholesterol test

tertiary intervention - correct answer an intervention that occurs after the initial
occurrence of symptoms but before irreversible disability occurs, ex: cardiac rehab programs

aggregate - correct answer defined population

community - correct answer composed of multiple aggregates

high risk populations - correct answer Certain groups of people who have a higher risk
of getting an illness than others

Validity - correct answer The ability of a test to measure what it is intended to measure

specificity - correct answer The ability of the test to identify correctly those who do not
have the disease.

sensitivity - correct answer the ability of a test to correctly identify those with the
disease

continuous variable screenings - correct answer those that are not either positive or
negative but occur on a continuum of values

Two stage testing - correct answer less sensitive first specific test is used often at a
lower cost or less risk to the patient, ex: TB skin

Positive predictive value - correct answer The probability that a person with a positive
test result actually has the disease

Negative predictive value - correct answer the probably that a person with a negative
test is truly free of disease

internal validity - correct answer interpreting the findings of a study depends on the-
design, conduct and analyses, does the study measure what it is supposed to measure

external validity - correct answer the extent to which the results of a study can be
generalized to other situations and to other people

gold standard - correct answer tests with 100% sensitivity and specificity

,NR-503 Midterm
Reliability - correct answer Ability of a test to yield very similar scores for the same
individual over repeated testings

probability - correct answer likelihood that a particular event will happen

likelihood ratio - correct answer combines sensitivity and specificity data to help the
clinician quantify how much the odds of disease change based on a positive or negative result

active surveillance - correct answer data actively collected, more specific objective,
information-gathering tools (questionnaires etc), more useful in epidemiological research than
passive.

passive surveillance - correct answer public health surveillance in which data are sent to
the health agency without prompting.

Heirarchy of Evidence - correct answer best = systematic reviews, RCT, cohort studies,
case control studies, case series, case reports editorials expert opinions = worst

chain of infection - correct answer factors that lead to the transmission or spread of
disease

descriptive epidemiology - correct answer describes the distribution of a disease and or
other related states and events in terms of personal characteristics, geographical distribution,
and time

case reports - correct answer accounts of a single occurrence of a noteworthy health-
related incident or small collection of such events

case series - correct answer report with a series of patients with similar diseases that
describes their management or treatment

correlational study - correct answer a descriptive study that looks for a consistent
relationship between populations or aggregates

cross-sectional study - correct answer A study in which a representative cross section of
the population is tested or surveyed at one specific time.(snap shot in time)

causation - correct answer A cause and effect relationship in which one variable controls
the changes in another variable.

Systematic (bias) error - correct answer occurs when selected subjects in a sample are
not representative of the population of interest, makes it appear (falsely) that there is or is not
an association between exposure and outcome

, NR-503 Midterm
non-probability sampling (non-random sampling) - correct answer members of target
population do not share and equal chance of being selected, i.e. convenience sample or
volunteers

Exclusion bias - correct answer applying different eligibility criteria to cases and controls

Withdrawal bias - correct answer patients who withdraw from a study are likely to differ
from those who do not

information bias - correct answer A prejudice in the data that results when either the
respondent or the interviewer has an agenda and is not presenting impartial questions or
responding with truly honest responses, respectively

measurement bias - correct answer a form of inaccurate measurement in which the
data consistently overestimate or underestimate the true value of an event

calibration error - correct answer systematic error in which an object's quantitative data
differs consistently from the true value on an interval level of measurement, ex: instrument is
not sensitive enough to measure a difference

misclassification bias - correct answer Occurs when either exposure or outcome is not
identified correctly, or case or control is not identified appropriately

Contamination bias - correct answer control group gets tx or intervention, thus
decreases diff between control vs tx

intent-to-treat principle - correct answer you assign patients to the original group you
intended to treat them in from the start of the study

recall bias - correct answer subjects fail to accurately recall events in the past



example:

- how many times last year did you kiss your mother?

- likely problem in retrospective studies



solution: confirmation of data from individual source

reporting bias - correct answer occurs when a source has the required knowledge but
we question his or her willingness to convey it accurately

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller examsetters. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $17.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83100 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$17.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart