100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Food and society principles and paradoxes summary + articles $7.16   Add to cart

Summary

Food and society principles and paradoxes summary + articles

2 reviews
 273 views  6 purchases
  • Course
  • Institution
  • Book

Book by Amy E. Guptill, Betsy Lucal, and Denise A. Copelton --> summary of all chapters

Preview 3 out of 25  pages

  • Yes
  • January 16, 2020
  • 25
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary

2  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: maleamiller • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: marnett • 1 year ago

avatar-seller
Amy E. Guptill, Denise A. Copelton and Betsy Lucal;
Food & Society. Principles and Paradoxes.

Chapter 1 Principles and paradoxes in the study of food
Racial eating contests: staged by whites for white audience. Similarity with today’s competitive
eating in form. Social and cultural contexts make them distinct.

Foodways = patterns that establish ‘’what we eat, how and why and under what circumstances we
eat’’.

 Focus on food preparation, consumption, cultural dimensions of food and eating

Key element of foodways = what we eat.

Food system = the set of vast, interlinked institutions and processes that transform sunlight, water
and soil into meaning-laden foods. It highlights the production, processing and distribution of food
and turns our attention to the materiality of the food we eat.

Major purpose of a food system = providing nutrition to keep us alive.

Historically, food systems small and localized. As technologies advanced and populations grew, food
systems became more complex. Workings of food systems are invisible  do not understand how
complex the system is.

Food production (too much or too little rain can interfere)  processing (strike by workers can shut
down processing)  distributed (hurricane can interrupt, trucking company going bankrupt) 
consumer

Waste: all the parts that we do not eat (including packaging, wastewater, chemicals).

Three principles (underlying the interdisciplinary study of food and society help frame our
understanding):

1. Food is both richly symbolic and undeniably material
a. Both social and physiological dimensions of food help explain food choices (comfort
food)
2. People’s experiences with food are individual and social
a. The practices we participate in reveal much about our social location and multiple
identities
3. Social inequality  persistent patterns in which some people enjoy more material and
cultural privileges than others.

These principles provide a conceptual framework  organizes our exploration of this field.

Paradoxes: the individual and society

Social constructionist perspective  out of frustration with structuralism’s tendency to make existing
structures seem inevitable and immutable and to frame individuals as passive.

Social constructionism = emphasizes individuals’ agency, when people make choices and behave in
certain ways, they help to shape the social world in which they live. Persistence of patterns 
because of continually reproduction by human action.

,Agency does not mean freedom from social influence; it means navigating and shaping social and
cultural landscapes both individually and collectively.

Personal food value systems = set of processes people use to make choices about foods they eat 
taste, health, cost, time and social relationships were the 5 main values around which these systems
revolved.



Chapter 2 Food and Identity: fitting in and standing out
Identity work = activity through which we define for ourselves and other who we are socially and
culturally.

Symbol = something that stands for something else

Status symbols = objects that signify one’s position (or social status) in society

Relationship between food and identity is complex interplay of individual and society.

Food functions also as status symbol, shaping how we see ourselves and how others view us. Food is
consumed through the social act of eating  plays significant role in social construction of identity.

Rituals = social activities performed primarily for their symbolic significance, rather than for practical
end

Religious rituals can contribute to social solidarity (the feelings of ‘’we-ness’’ within groups). It gives
participants feelings of connection to other past and present members. Rituals are key to maintaining
group identity and values, and powerful agents of social transformation

Food and national and regional identity

Cuisines = distinct sets of ingredients, flavor principles, and cooking techniques  foster unique
national and regional identities.

National/regional cuisines stems from distinctive local agricultures, ethnic, religious and other social
differences associated with people of the giving area, representing structural and cultural
dimensions.

Structural differences have more to do with how economic and political systems, geography and
climate, shape foodways. Link between food and identity is not simply a matter of individual
preference or choice  shaped by social structural features beyond the control of anybody.

National rituals of solidarity are important for generating feelings of social cohesion and symbolically
incorporating new members.

Invented traditions (like thanksgiving) serve 3 important purposes:

1. They symbolize social cohesion and create strong collective identity
2. They establish new social institutions and legitimize existing ones
3. They socialize individuals into the shared norms and values of the group practicing them

All countries, particularly multicultural ones, need rituals to create a sense of national community.

Benedict Anderson calls nations imagined communities since ‘’members of the smallest nation will
never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of

, each lives the image of their communion.’’  this concept helps to explain why for example
Thanksgiving is an important ritual.

Rituals can also reflect persistent inequalities.

Food and racial-ethnic identity

Ethnic revival = when Americans sought to reclaim their ethnic heritage as a response to the
hegemonic process (=the way dominant cultural forms incorporate and thereby erase cultural
distinctions)

Reclaiming a lost ethnic heritage creates a neo-ethnicity. In seeking neo-ethnicity, members of the
grassroots ethnic revival embraced traditional cultural forms (like ethnic foodways).

Culinary tourists = those who view ethnic food as an enjoyable respite from normal and mundane
foodways.

Because ethnic food was linked to high-quality ingredients and supposedly authentic and time-
consuming cooking techniques, manufacturers could present packaged ethnic food as a specialty
product with higher prices.

Mainstream corporations acquired businesses to expand their profits by moving from mass
marketing to micro-marketing = promoting specific products to narrowly defined consumer groups
based on age, gender, ethnicity and other social statuses.

- Advantage: through this marketing, corporations could market ethnic goods to middle-and
upper-class families who could afford their higher costs, and other generations immigrants
who lacked the time and knowledge to cook ethnic food.

Food and social class identity

Lower-class groups tend to have poorer diets than higher-status groups  healthier foods cost more
 cost produces a social class gradient in diet and nutrition

Bourdieu noted 3 differences between upper-class and working-class foodways:

1. Upper-class foodways require one to defer gratification, while working-class ones embrace
immediate satisfaction
2. Upper-class foodways valorize difficult and time-consuming dishes, while working-class ones
celebrate simple and quick ones
3. Upper-class culture prioritizes form, while working-class culture emphasizes substance and
function

Many people in affluent countries participate in both classes foodways at times; Bourdieu notes that
social class influences which ones a person finds accessible and enjoyable.

Food and gender identity

There are multiple ways in which food is gendered:

- Within a culture, particular foods or dishes are constructed as masculine or feminine.
- Men and women have different relationships with food (women  concern with food and
weight)
- Men have increased their share of household labor, women still perform the bulk of
housework, including feeding work (= planning and provisioning meals and preparing)

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller riannetanis1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $7.16. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

83100 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$7.16  6x  sold
  • (2)
  Add to cart