100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
QLD BAR EXAM 2024 (EVIDENCE REVIEW) WITH MULTIPLE RELEVANT QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS $11.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

QLD BAR EXAM 2024 (EVIDENCE REVIEW) WITH MULTIPLE RELEVANT QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • QLD BAR
  • Institution
  • QLD BAR

QLD BAR EXAM 2024 (EVIDENCE REVIEW) WITH MULTIPLE RELEVANT QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT ANSWERS

Preview 3 out of 24  pages

  • October 5, 2024
  • 24
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • QLD BAR
  • QLD BAR
avatar-seller
bonie314
QLD BAR EXAM 2024 (EVIDENCE REVIEW) WITH
x x x x x x




x MULTIPLE RELEVANT QUESTIONS WITH CORRECT
x x x x




x ANSWERS GRADED A+
x x




Legal xBurden xvs xEvidentiary xBurden xof xproof x x x x x x x x x x x xANS: x- xEvidentiary
xburden: xBRING xEVIDENCE. xThe xburden xof xa xparty xto xbring xevidence xthat xthere

xis xsufficient xevidence xto xraise xan xissue xas xthe xexistence xof xa xFII. xThe xparty

xwho xis xmaking xa xclaim xor xassertion xmust xbe xable xto xprove xit xwith xevidence.




Legal xburden: xPROVE xTHE xEVIDENCE xto xa xthe xstandard, xor xlevel xof xproof xa
xparty xhas xan xobligation xto xreach xto xprove xa xFII x(e.g. xCrown xas xto xBRD).




Judge's xDiscretion x x x x x x x x x x x xANS: x- xA xjudge xhas xa xdiscretion xto xexclude
xevidence x(eg. xa xconfession) xon xthe xground xthat xit xis xhighly xprejudicial xand xnot

xprobative x(reliable) xor xfor xpublic xpolicy xreasons x(eg. xevidence xillegally

xobtained): xBunning xv xCross x(1978); xs130 xEvidence xAct x1977 x(Qld); xss135-139

xEA; xR xv xChristie.

,Browne xv xDunn x x x x x x x x x x x xANS: x- xRule: xUnless xnotice xhas xbeen xgiven, xCounsel
xthat xwishes xto xcontradict xa xwitness xby xcalling xother xevidence xmust xput xthat

xevidence xto xthe xwitness xfor xtheir xcomment.




Rationale: xAnti-ambush xrule xfor xfairness. xAllows xother xparty xto xcall xevidence
xso xthey xcan xexplain xit. x


Court xcan xthen xenjoy xjoinder xevidence/FII.



Consequences xof xnon-compliance:

Ethical xand xevidentiary ximplications; xcan xbe xgiven xless xweight, xdenial xof xright
xto xrespond xby xparty/witness, xother xparty xmay xbe xentitled xrecall xevidence/put

xrebuttal xevidence. xPotential xmistrial, xappeal xor xjury xwarning xgiven.




Provide xan xexample.



Jones xv xDunkel x[1959] x x x x x x x x x x x xANS: x- xRule: xIn xcertain xcircumstances, xa xparty
xthat xprovides xan xunexplained xfailure xto xprovide xevidence xmay xlead xto xan

xinference xthat xthe xuncalled xevidence xwould xnot xhave xassisted xthe xparty's

xcase.




Rationale: xDeterrence xagainst xparties xtempted xto xwithhold xevidence; xpromotes
xfairness, xdiscourages xparties xfrom xhiding xor xsuppressing xevidence xthat xcould

xweaken xtheir xposition, xand xpromotes xtransparency.

, Provide xexample.



When xdoes xJones xv xDunkel xnot xapply? x x x x x x x x x x x xANS: x- xLimited xapplication xin
xcriminal xproceedings, xcan xbe xused xagainst xCrown.




Also xdoes xnot xapply xin xthe xappropriate xcircumstances: x1) xwhen xthe xparty xis
x'required xto xexplain xor xcontradict xsomething' xand x2) xit xis xwithin xtheir xpower

xto xtender xit, xand x3) xthere xis xno xadequate xexplanation xas xto xfailure.




Bunning xv xCross x[1978] x x x x x x x x x x x xANS: x- xRule: xEvidence xthat xwas xobtained
xunlawfully/improperly xmust xnot xbe xadmitted xunless xthe ximportance/probative

xvalue x> xfactors x(public xinterest, xunfairness xand xprejudice). xCodified xin xs138

xCEA. xFactors xare: xdeliberateness xof xthe xconduct, xprobative xvalue xof xthe

xevidence, xease xwith xwhich xcompliance xwith xlaw xmight xhave xbeen xachieved,

xnature xof xthe xoffence xcharged, xpurpose xof xthe xlegislative xrestrictions.




Rationale: xStriking xa xbalance xbetween xenforcing xpublic xinterest xwith xfair
xpolicing/disclosure xagainst xexclusion xof xevidence xotherwise xnot xmanifestly

xunfair/prejudicial x(eg xniche xtechnical xpoints). xOperative xdeterrence xagainst xbad

xpolicing xand xreliance xon xexclusionary xrules xof xevidence.




Exclusion xof xRelevant xEvidence x x x x x x x x x x x xANS: x- x1) xR xv xChristie: xprejudicial
xvalue x> xprobative xvalue.


2) xUnfairness xin xs x130 xEAQ/s x135 xEAC. x

Provide xexample xof xeach.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bonie314. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77333 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart