100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU Exam/33 Complete Q’s and A’s $8.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU Exam/33 Complete Q’s and A’s

 5 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU
  • Institution
  • BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU

BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU Exam/33 Complete Q’s and A’s

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

  • October 4, 2024
  • 5
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU
  • BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU
avatar-seller
Nursephil2023
BA 300 Session 1 Austin SDSU
Exam/33 Complete Q’s and A’s
characteristics of individuals - -cognitive biases
individual differences

- process of ethical decision-making behavior - -1) moral awareness
2) ethical judgment
3) ethical behavior

- characteristics of organizations - -group/organizational pressures
organizational culture

- moral awareness - -likely to recognize moral issue when
-peers consider it morally problematic
-moral language is used when problem is presented
-decision could cause serious harm to others

- sound ethical decision-making - -1) gather the facts
2) define the ethical issues
3) identify the affected parties
4) identify the consequences
5) identify the obligations
6) consider your character and integrity
7) think creatively about potential actions
8) check your gut

- ways that an organization shapes the ethical behavior of an individual - -1)
who shapes your ethical decisions;
2) the Pygmalion effect about how expectations affect the quality of those
decisions
3) how rewards and punishments systems encourage or discourage ethical
behavior
4) the specific role of goals in ethical conduct
5) diffusion of responsibility, about how spreading the work may let people
off the hook for the ethical consequences of their individual behavior
6) the way the role the organization assigns individuals may influence the
quality of the ethical decisions they make

- who affects our ethical decision making? - -peers and superiors

- the pygmalion effect - --when we expect certain behaviors of others, we
are likely to act in ways that make the expected behavior more likely to
occur

, -applied to the business setting, if your supervisor cues you that she expects
you to be upright and honest in using the company's resources, you are
likely to behave accordingly

- rewards and punishments - -determine how people behave
reward - encourage ethical behavior
punishment - frowns upon unethical behavior

- goals - --focus on individual/team/company to think creatively
-may lead people to cut corners if company focuses on meeting goal
regardless of ethical behavior

- diffusion of responsibility - --taken away
-shared w/ others
-obscured by organizational hierarchy
-diluted by psychological distance to potential victims

- roles and deindividuation - --may reduce individual sense of responsibility
-process by which an individual minimizes his or her personal responsibility
for an action by focusing on his or her assigned role

- discrimination laws - --title XII
-fair employment and housing act
-prohibits discrimination based on race gender religion etc

- whistleblower laws - --prohibit employers from firing employees for
communicating company's misconduct to government officials
-governments often encourages/incentivizes people to whistleblow

- federal organizational sentencing guidelines - --manage corporate crime
-dramatic increase in in-house ethics officers to ensure compliance with
ethical rules/laws
-"The sentencing guidelines use a 'carrot and stick' approach to managing
corporate crime. The carrot provides incentives to organizations to develop a
strong internal control system to detect and manage illegal behavior. The
stick provides for severe punishment for organizations that are convicted of
crimes and were not proactively managing legal compliance within the
organization."

- cognitive biases - --fact gathering: overconfidence in your knowledge of
facts; confirmation trap

-looking at consequences: reduced number of consequences; self vs. others'
consequences; escalation of commitment; consequences as risk

-thinking about integrity: illusion of superiority; ethics of your profession

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Nursephil2023. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $8.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82191 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$8.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart