100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
BUS 302L - Business Law Exam Questions and Answers |100% Pass $12.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

BUS 302L - Business Law Exam Questions and Answers |100% Pass

 0 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • BUS 302L
  • Institution
  • BUS 302L

BUS 302L - Business Law Exam Questions and Answers |100% Pass c. win the case, but only if a court or trier of fact concludes that Dan had reasonable cause to believe Paul may have shoplifted, detained him for a reasonable time, and in a reasonable manner. - Answer-Paul filed a lawsuit for fals...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 52  pages

  • October 3, 2024
  • 52
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • BUS 302L
  • BUS 302L
avatar-seller
EmillyCharlotte
EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YAER ©2024 EMILLYCHARLOTTE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
FIRST PUBLISH SEPTEMBER 2024




BUS 302L - Business Law Exam
Questions and Answers |100% Pass

c. win the case, but only if a court or trier of fact concludes that Dan had reasonable cause to


believe Paul may have shoplifted, detained him for a reasonable time, and in a reasonable


manner. - Answer✔✔-Paul filed a lawsuit for false imprisonment against Dan's Bookstore. during a visit

to Dan's Bookstore, Dan stopped Paul as he left the store. Dan accused Paul of stealing a book from the

store. After briefly looking into Paul's shopping bag, Dan determined that Paul did not shoplift. He

apologized to Paul and released him. On these facts, Dan will likely:




a. win the case, because the shopkeepers' privilege statute gives store merchants unconditional

immunity (protection) from such lawsuits.




b. lose the case, because Paul did not shoplift.




c. win the case, but only if a court or trier of fact concludes that Dan had reasonable cause to believe

Paul may have shoplifted, detained him for a reasonable time, and in a reasonable manner.




d. lose the case, because Dan did not have a warrant.


Page 1/52

,EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YAER ©2024 EMILLYCHARLOTTE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
FIRST PUBLISH SEPTEMBER 2024


c. Bonds' letter is an offer if a reasonable person with full knowledge of the circumstances


would be justified in thinking it was intended as an offer. - Answer✔✔-Bonds wrote McGuire, "I will sell

you my house and lot at 419 West Lombard Street, San


Francisco, California for $950,000 payable upon merchantable deed, deal to be completed within


60 days of the date of your acceptance." Assuming that Bonds' letter contains terms which are


deemed sufficiently certain and definite, which of the following statements is correct?




a. Bonds' letter is not an offer unless Bonds intended it to be an offer.




b. Bonds' letter is not an offer unless McGuire thought Bonds intended to make an offer.




c. Bonds' letter is an offer if a reasonable person with full knowledge of the circumstances


would be justified in thinking it was intended as an offer.




d. Bonds' letter is not a offer unless both Bonds and McGuire considered it as an offer.


d. The letter lacks one of the essential elements of an offer. - Answer✔✔-Iverson Jewelers wrote a letter

to Miller, "We have received an exceptionally fine self winding


Rolox watch which we will sell to you at a very favorable price."



Page 2/52

,EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YAER ©2024 EMILLYCHARLOTTE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
FIRST PUBLISH SEPTEMBER 2024




a. The letter is an offer to sell.




b. A valid offer cannot be made by letter.




c. The letter contains a valid offer which will terminate within a reasonable time.




d. The letter lacks one of the essential elements of an offer


d. Paul was able to prove all of the above (a, b & c). - Answer✔✔-Don was negligently driving south on

Merdock Avenue when his car rear-ended a car driven by


Patty. The force of the impact forced Patty to rear-end Terry's car. In turn, the force of the second impact

caused Terry's car to hit a lamppost, which then fell on a house owned by Paul. The force of the impact

scared Paul, causing him to immediately have a heart attack. Paul sues


Don for negligence. If Paul recovers, the most likely reason is:




a. Paul was able to prove that Don proximately caused Paul's injuries.




b. Paul was able to prove that the damages he suffered were actually caused by Don.




Page 3/52

, EMILLYCHARLOTTE 2024/2025 ACADEMIC YAER ©2024 EMILLYCHARLOTTE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
FIRST PUBLISH SEPTEMBER 2024


c. Paul was able to prove that Don breached a duty of due care owed by Don to Paul.




d. Paul was able to prove all of the above (a, b & c).


b. A contract was created but likely not enforceable because the statute of limitations has expired. -

Answer✔✔-Sammy agreed to sell and Larry agreed to buy Sammy's car for $400, payable upon delivery.


Sammy delivered and left the car with Larry. However, Larry failed to pay Sammy the $400.


After eight years had passed following the delivery and acceptance of the car by Larry, Sammy sued Larry

in state court for failure to pay him the $400. Based only on the above stated facts,


which of the following statement is most accurate? Assume the UCC applies and the statute of


limitations for oral contracts is two years and for written contracts is four years.




a. No contract was ever created between Sammy and Larry.




b. A contract was created but likely not enforceable because the statute of limitations has expired.




c. A contract was created, but it is only enforceable if it is in writing.




d. A contract was created and is enforceable



Page 4/52

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller EmillyCharlotte. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $12.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79316 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$12.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart