100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
I (H) unit 4 Personal 9th, 5th amendment privacy Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade $9.59   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

I (H) unit 4 Personal 9th, 5th amendment privacy Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Connecticut
  • Institution
  • Connecticut

I (H) unit 4 Personal 9th, 5th amendment privacy Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v Wade...

Preview 2 out of 13  pages

  • October 3, 2024
  • 13
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • connecticut
  • privacy griswold
  • Connecticut
  • Connecticut
avatar-seller
luzlinkuz
I (H) unit 4 Personal 9th, 5th amendment
privacy Griswold v Connecticut and Roe v
Wade

9th - ANSWER The inclusion in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be
interpreted to reject or degrade others preserved by the people.

Enumeration - ANSWER Listing


Constructed - Answer interpreted


Disparage - To denigrate or discount.


9th - ANSWER: Written-out rights in the Constitution cannot be interpreted,
rejected, or discredited.


9th - ANSWER Bill of Rights specifies that other rights may exist in addition to
those officially stated and that just because they are not named does not mean
they cannot be violated.


The ninth amendment safeguards - ANSWER unenumerated rights--that have
not been written out in the constitution.


Right to travel and visit places

Right to vote, right to choose
.

Right to privacy. The government cannot dictate what w

, e can or cannot do.


But, there are certain limitations.




The Right to Privacy - ANSWER Freedom from government interference
cannot take control of everything in our life.


Personal property cannot be taken home without recompense.


Personal rights.


Griswold v Connecticut 1961 Facts: ANSWER In 1961, Estelle Griswold, the
leader of Plan Parenthood, and Lee Buxton, a doctor at Yale and attorney for
Plan Parenthood, were convicted of breaching a Connecticut state statute.


They provided advice and prescriptions for contraception to married couples.


Griswold v. Connecticut 1961 Making an Inference - Answer Justice William
Douglas used inferences to argue that the Constitution protects private rights.


He did it first....

Reviewed the facts.

Consider the significance underlying the data.

Learn what the author is implying.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller luzlinkuz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.59. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.59
  • (0)
  Add to cart