100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PLS 320 Exam 1 questions with correct answers $17.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

PLS 320 Exam 1 questions with correct answers

 1 view  0 purchase
  • Course
  • PLS 320
  • Institution
  • PLS 320

PLS 320 Exam 1 questions with correct answers

Preview 3 out of 20  pages

  • September 23, 2024
  • 20
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • PLS 320
  • PLS 320
avatar-seller
BravelRadon
PLS 320 Exam 1

Ever since the decision in the case Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court has slowly but surely worked
to avoid conflict with the other two branches of government. However, this is not always the case. -
correct answer ✔✔false



President Franklin Delano Roosevelt expected the Supreme Court to be critical of his New Deal
legislation, but he did not expect the Court to actually attempt to shut it down. - correct answer ✔✔false



Even Justice Owen J. Roberts, the swing vote on the Supreme Court, could not have saved FDR's New
Deal legislation from being shut down by the Black Monday rulings. - correct answer ✔✔true



In 1935, the Supreme Court declared that FDR did have the right to remove people from independent
regulatory conditions if they were deemed "inefficient" in their position - correct answer ✔✔true



The case Gibbons v. Ogden significantly limited an aspect of the federal government's power. - correct
answer ✔✔false



A person who interprets the Commerce Clause as limited also believes—in turn—in a broad amount of
power for the states. - correct answer ✔✔true



James McReynolds' court packing plan would allow up to 15 justices to serve on the Supreme Court -
correct answer ✔✔true



In a fireside chat in 1937, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt said that he was a proponent of
appointing more justices so that they could decide cases in his favor. - correct answer ✔✔false



At first, a majority of the public did not agree with the idea of "court packing" when it was first
presented - correct answer ✔✔true

,Because of FDR's stance on the Judicial Procedures Reform Bill, Congress later seeks to financially
incentivize federal judges into retiring. - correct answer ✔✔true



By changing his voting tendencies, Justice Owen J. Roberts essentially "saved" the Supreme Court from
"packing." - correct answer ✔✔true



Franklin Delano Roosevelt had the most Supreme Court appointments out of any modern president -
correct answer ✔✔true



The idea of court packing is still brought up as a solution to the "problems" faced by the Supreme Court
in present times. - correct answer ✔✔true



In 2021, Politico found that Republicans are more likely to approve of court packing while Democrats are
more likely to disapprove. - correct answer ✔✔false



In 1937, FDR proposes that whenever a judge or justice of a federal court reaches the age of 70, a new
judge should be appointed by the then-President to be confirmed by the Senate, regardless of their
retirement status. - correct answer ✔✔false



Franklin Delano Roosevelt believed that the Supreme Court was overpowered by the other branches of
government, which was one of the reasons why he was a proponent of "packing" the Court—to
"restore" the balance between branches. - correct answer ✔✔false



According to Caldeira (1987), in relation to FDR's New Deal legislation, the Supreme Court's decision did
have a large role to play in shaping public opinion. - correct answer ✔✔true



The results of the study performed by Caldeira (1987) indicate that the public was not overwhelmingly
swayed by the media in any particular direction when it came to court packing. - correct answer ✔✔true



In 1937, FDR proposed the idea to nominate a judge for every member on the bench to replace the
sitting judge if they did not retire at 70. - correct answer ✔✔false

, Because individuals are generally rooted in their beliefs, it is not the media that sways the public, but
rather the public that sways the media. - correct answer ✔✔false



Alexander Hamilton writes in Federalist #78 that the judiciary only appears to be the "least dangerous"
branch on the surface, but we should not underestimate its strength. It holds a lot of power and should
thus be closely observed. - correct answer ✔✔false



With the passage of the Judiciary Act of 1789, state issues could now be appealed to the federal judiciary
if they applied to federal law. - correct answer ✔✔true



It was not the Constitution, but the Judiciary Act of 1789, that established a nine-justice Supreme Court.
- correct answer ✔✔false



If you lose a case at the district court level, the other party may appeal it at the circuit court level. -
correct answer ✔✔false



While we now have a three-judge panel that stays in place at the circuit court level, that was not always
the case. Previously, two judges, a Supreme Court Justice and a District Court judge, would meet to
decide a case at the appellate level. - correct answer ✔✔false



In our country's early years, people considered serving on the Supreme Court to be a politically weak
position when compared to other, more "powerful" societal roles. Many would rather fill other
"esteemed" positions, so it was often difficult to keep a justice on the bench for relatively long. - correct
answer ✔✔true



Article III of the Constitution says that the Supreme Court shall only have original jurisdiction in all cases
affecting ambassadors, public ministers and counsels, and those in which the state is a party. - correct
answer ✔✔true



The modes of transportation they had to use as well as the distances they had to travel made Justices
generally consider circuit riding to be an unenjoyable experience. - correct answer ✔✔true



Although Justices today no longer have to ride circuits, they still have to "supervise" their circuits that
they are assigned to. - correct answer ✔✔true

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller BravelRadon. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $17.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76669 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$17.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart