Definition 1 of 84
These employees may or may not know the rules, but they don't care either way. They have
their own agenda, and they lack any company or professional loyalty.
Definition 3 of 84
beyond legal responsibilities to encompass the more general responsibility to avoid harm and
do what's right, again relying on ethical decision-making processes to make these decisions
ethical organizations
ethics
ethical responsibility
ethical awareness- 3 factors
,Definition 4 of 84
↑ presence of aggravating factors. org size, degree of participation, disregard for criminal
conduct, prior history, impeding investigation,
Socialization
Fairness
rule-based climate
Culpability score ↑
Definition 5 of 84
reciprocity, equity, impartiality
reciprocity
virtue ethics
ethics
fairness
Definition 6 of 84
a worker has been made to feel uncomfortable because of unwelcome actions or comments
relating to sexuality
hostile work environment
abusive or intimidating behavior
groupthink
sexual harassment
,Definition 7 of 84
Neutral, third-party verifiable process to understand, measure, report on, and help improve an
organization's social and environmental performance.
ethics culture audit
fairness
ethical responsibility
utilitarianism
Definition 8 of 84
pragmatic, ethical, strategic
corporate social responsibility 2 reasons
corporate social responsibility types
corporate social responsibility 0 reasons
corporate social responsibility 3 reasons
Definition 9 of 84
focuses more on the integrity of the moral actor (the person) than on the moral act itself (the
decision or behavior)
moral disengagement
virtue ethics
"subtle" bribe
utilitarianism
, Definition 10 of 84
term from social psychology for the process of convincing the self that ethical standards do
not apply to oneself in a particular context, by separating moral reactions from inhumane
conduct by disabling the mechanism of self-condemnation
moral uncertainty
moral outrage
moral disengagement
ethical efficacy
Definition 11 of 84
A series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale Universitypsychologist Stanley
Milgram. They measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who
instructed them to perform acts conflicting with their personal conscience.-Mcdonalds case
At-will employment
Stanford prison experiment
Milgram experiment
Zimbardo experiment
Definition 12 of 84
the person's emphasis on ethical principles being dependent on the situation rather than being
applicable to all situations
legal responsibility
ethical responsibility
relativism (ethical decision making style)
Cognative Moral Development - Conventional
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller selftest. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $9.00. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.