Exam (elaborations)
LEGL 2700- test 4 cases, Roessing fully solved & verified for accuracy 2025(GUARANTEED SUCCESS).
- Course
- Institution
LEGL 2700- test 4 cases, Roessing fully solved & verified for accuracy 2025(GUARANTEED SUCCESS).
[Show more]
Content preview
LEGL 2700- test 4 cases,Roessing fully solved & verified
for accuracy
2025(GUARANTEED SUCCESS)
Alli v. US (2008) - answer -Dr. Alli and his wife claimed the corporate
structure shielded them from decision made in the name of the
corporation
-The court concluded that Alli did not act as though the corporation
was independent from their personal assets
-the court also found that tho corporation form had been used to
commit a wrong by failing to adhere to obligations to keep the
properties decent and safe for tenants
Winner: US
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby (2014) - answer court found that closely
held corporations are "persons" within the Religious Freedoms
Restoration Act
Winner: Hobby Lobby
Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T Inc. (2011) - answer -
AT&T wanted protection by personal privacy
-Even though a corporation is treated the same as an individual
under most aspects of the law, there are some rights only an
individual can possess
-the court determined that corporations do not have privacy rights,
at least in the way intended by congress
Winner: FCC
, Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
- answer -Businesses challenge audit oversight board
-board members had "double tenure"
-can only be fired "for cause" by SEC
-SEC can only be fired "for cause" by president
-court finds this unconstitutional, but upholds the PCAOB's
regulations
-adjusted so SEC can fire at will
Winner: FEF (sort of)
FDA v. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation (1999) - answer -
can the FDA regulate tobacco advertising?
-Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act give broad powers
-but subsequent statutes indicate "hands off" tobacco
-court vacates regulations 5-4
-2009- new statute, 2016- applies to e-cigs
Winner: Brown and Williamson
Magnetball Litigation - answer -in 2012, CPSC imposes recall, then
sues to enforce
-Buckyballs settles, Zen Magnet fights it
-in 2016, 10th circuit validates CPSC recall
-CPSC works to revise rule, fails to get consensus
-CPSC currently has a 2-2 political split
-deals with the question of whether or not agencies have too much
control
Thompson v. North American Stainless (2011) - answer -Eric
Thompson and his fiance Miriam Reginaldo worked for the same
employer, NAS. After Reginaldo filled out a Title VII claim with the
EEOC, NAS fired Thompson.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller GUARANTEEDSUCCESS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $14.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
82105 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now