Legal cases Louisiana post. Exam Questions With Correct Answers
1 view 0 purchase
Course
Legal cases
Institution
Legal Cases
Legal cases Louisiana post. Exam Questions
With Correct Answers
A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant
issued by him or her is not valid. - answerCoolidge v. New Hampshire
The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the infor...
Legal cases Louisiana post. Exam Questions
With Correct Answers
A state's chief investigator and prosecutor ( state AG) is not neutral and detached, so any warrant
issued by him or her is not valid. - answer✔Coolidge v. New Hampshire
The validity of a warrant must be judged in light of the information available to the officers at
the time they obtained the warrant. A warrant that is overboard in describing the place to be
searched is valid if based on a reasonable but mistaken belief at the time the warrant is issued.
Also see, exclusionary rule lecture under good faith exceptions. - answer✔Maryland v.
Garrison
Police may only search the arrestee's vehicle subsequent to his arrest, when it is reasonable that
the arrestee could access a weapon or destroy evidence of his arrest, contained within the
vehicle. - answer✔Arizona v. Gant (2009)
Placing a GPS device and monitoring the device requires a search warrant. - answer✔U.S. v.
Jones
Feds adopt the exclusionary rule - answer✔Weeks v. U.S.
States adopt the exclusionary rule and state it's an essential part of both the 4th and 14th
amendments. - answer✔Mapp v. Ohio
Established two prong tests for determining probable cause on the basis of information obtained
from an informant. - answer✔Aguilar v. Texas
"Innocent-seeming activity and data" and a "bald and unilluminating assertion of suspicion in an
affidavit are not to be given weight in magistrate's determination of probable cause. An officer
may use credible hearsay to establish probable cause, but an affidavit based on an informant's tip
must satisfy the two-pronged Aguilar test. - answer✔Spinelli v. United States
Abandoned the requirement of the two independent tests as they were too rigid, holding instead
that the two prongs should be treated merely as relevant considerations in the totality of the
circumstances. - answer✔Illinois v. Gates
A leading case on information plus corroboration - answer✔Draper v. U.S.
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Brightstars. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
