Exam (elaborations)
BUS 302L – BUSINESS LAW EXAM WITH QUESTIONS AND 100% VERIFIED ANSWERS
- Course
- Institution
BUS 302L – BUSINESS LAW EXAM WITH QUESTIONS AND 100% VERIFIED ANSWERS...
[Show more]
Content preview
C. win the case, but only if a fact-finder or court determines that Dan had alegitimate motive to
think Paul could have committed shoplifting, hold him for a fair amount of
time, and in a fair
in a way. - ANSWER Paul sued Dan's Bookstore alleging false confinement.
Dan stopped Paul as he was leaving Dan's Bookstore when he was there. Paul
was charged by Dan with taking a book from the bookstore. Dan quickly
examined Paul's shopping bag and concluded that Paul had not stolen anything.
After expressing regret to Paul, he let him go. Given these details, Dan is likely
to:
a. win the case since store merchants are granted absolute immunity (protection)
against these types of litigation by the Shopkeepers' privilege Act.
b. defeat the case, as Paul did not steal from stores.
C. win the case, but only if a judge or fact-finder finds that Dan had a good
reason to think Paul might have committed shoplifting and that he was held for
a fair amount of time and in a fair way.
d. lose the case as Dan's warrant was missing.
C. Bonds' letter is an offer in the event that a sane person would have known all
the details.
would have been reasonable to assume that it was meant to be an offer. "I will
sell you my house and lot at 419 West Lombard Street, San Francisco," wrote
ANSWER Bonds to McGuire.
,Francisco, California for $950,000, which must be paid with a merchantable
deed; the transaction must be finalized within
Within sixty days from the date of your acceptance." Presuming that Bonds'
letter includes provisions that are
Which of the following statements best describes what is considered to be
sufficiently certain and definite?
a. Unless specifically stated as an offer, Bonds' letter is not one.
b. Unless McGuire believed Bonds meant to make an offer, Bonds' letter is not
an offer.
C. Bonds' letter is an offer in the event that a sane person would have known all
the details.
would have been reasonable to assume that it was meant to be an offer.
d. Unless Bonds and McGuire both regarded Bonds' letter as an offer, it is not
an offer.
d. One of the necessary components of an offer is absent from the letter. -
ANSWER Miller received a message from Iverson Jewelers saying, "We have
received an extraordinarily nice self winding
Rolox watch that we will provide to you at a very competitive cost."
a. The letter is a sales pitch.
b. A letter cannot be used to make a valid offer.
C. The letter includes a legitimate offer that expires in a fair amount of time.
d. One of the necessary components of an offer is absent from the letter.
,d. Paul was able to provide evidence for items a, b, and c. - ANSWER Don's car
struck a car driven by as it was carelessly traveling south on Merdock Avenue.
Pat. Terry's automobile was rear-ended by Patty due to the intensity of the
accident. Terry's automobile then struck a lamppost, which toppled on Paul's
house as a result of the force of the second impact. Paul had a heart attack right
away because of how frightening the hit was. Paul files a lawsuit
Don due of carelessness. Paul's recovery is most likely due to:
a. Paul was able to demonstrate that his injuries were directly caused by Don.
b. Paul was able to demonstrate that Don was the real cause of the harm he
experienced.
C. Paul was able to demonstrate that Don had violated a duty of care he owed
him.
d. Paul was able to provide evidence for items a, b, and c.
b. A contract was made, but since the statute of limitations has passed, it
probably cannot be enforced. - ANSWER Larry agreed to purchase Sammy's
car for $400, which would be paid upon delivery, and Sammy agreed to sell.
After delivering, Sammy gave Larry the automobile. But Larry never gave
Sammy the $400.
Eight years after Larry took delivery of the car and accepted it, Sammy filed a
state court lawsuit against Larry for not giving him the $400. Considering just
the information mentioned before,
Out of all the statements, which one is most true? Let's say the UCC is in effect
and the statute of
There are two-year limitations for oral contracts and four-year limitations for
written contracts.
a. There was never a contract between Sammy and Larry.
, b. A contract was made, but since the statute of limitations has passed, it
probably cannot be enforced.
C. There was an agreement made, but it can only be carried out with written
consent.
d. There was a created contract that is enforceable.
a. Ajax is a vendor offering Sipep for sale. ANSWER: At the Ajax Minimart,
Bill bought a can of Sipep. Bill discovered that the Sipep can had dead insects
lodged on the interior bottom after he had finished drinking it. In order to
successfully sue Ajax for strict product liability, Bill will need to demonstrate,
among other things:
a. Ajax is a vendor offering Sipep for sale.
b. Ajax ought to have been aware of the flawed state.
C. Ajax was aware of earlier instances of comparable issues with Sipep goods.
d. It was Ajax who put the dead insects in the can.
C. (A) and (B) are both accurate. - ANSWER Strict product liability applies in
which of the following scenarios?
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller luzlinkuz. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $11.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
78291 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now