100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary readings week 5 (D'Emilio, Wekker, Ford, Gamson & Moon, Simon & Gagnon) $4.50   Add to cart

Summary

Summary readings week 5 (D'Emilio, Wekker, Ford, Gamson & Moon, Simon & Gagnon)

 62 views  1 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

Summary of all the readings of week 5 from the second year sociology course 'Intersectionalities: Class, Race, Gender and Sexualities. Subject: sexuality.

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • December 6, 2019
  • 7
  • 2019/2020
  • Summary
avatar-seller
Summary readings intersectionalities week 5

Wekker, G. (1999). “What’s identity got to do with it?” Rethinking
identity in light of the Mati Work in Suriname
Wekker wants to present a differently conceived sexual configuration that does not posit a fixed
notion of ‘sexual identity’. Sexuality based on class, race and spirituality.

Mati are women who engage in sexual relationships with men and with women, either
simultaneously or consecutively, and who conceive of their sexual acts in terms of behavior. This is
mainly in the working class. 3 out of 4 women will be engaged in it at some point in their lives. Mati
form part of and actually continually ‘cross over’ in a dual sexual system, which comprises an
opposite-gendered and a same-gendered arena.

“I am a gold coin, I pass through all hands, but I do not lose my value.”  which means: it does not
matter how many relationships I have had, whether with men or with women. What counts is how I
carry myself through life, as a mother, with dignity and (self)respect, all of which characterize a
mature woman, who knows how to take care of business.
- Gold  women consider themselves inherently worthy and valuable. The self is
conceptualized as multiplicitous, mallable, dynamic, contextually salient. Mati work is seen as
a particularly pleasing and joyous activity, not as an identity.
- Coin  women going from one relationship to the next. Second meaning: women envision a
relatively straightforward exchange relationship between sex and money in their connections
with men.

Relationship with a man is different from relationship with a woman:
- Man  working class women (both mati and women exclusively involved with men) need
men to make them children and they need men’s financial contributions to keep their
household afloat.
- Woman  female lovers do exchange money, but their relationship is mainly emotional.
They got a lot of rights and mutual obligations. They share everyday concerns, raise each
others children, give emotional support and sexual pleasure.

There is a dual sexual system with different power dynamics between the partners:
- Opposite-gendered arena  men have an economically stronger position and decide in
sexual encounters. Women tend to see each other as competitors for men’s favors. There is
no specific set of ideas, rules and practices
- Same-gendered arena  women are able to define what their sexual and emotional
pleasures are. Economically more egalitarian.

Same gender desire is in working class in Suriname different from in Western nations. In the west, a
person is either heterosexual or homosexual. Dichotomous, hierarchical thinking. In Suriname, there
is a additive, inclusive thinking. A person is conceived of as multiple, malleable, dynamic, and
possessing male and female elements. There is no stigma attached to mati work.

, Ford, J. (2017). “Going with the flow”: How college men’s
experiences of unwanted sex are produced by gendered
interactional pressures
Research question: is it possible that interactional expectations are more important than fear in
pushing men toward unwanted sex?
Why men have unwanted sex:
1. Tendency to smooth interactional processes  Goffman’s communicative morality of
interaction = the general rules about how one is supposed to conduct themselves during
interaction. This leads to men having unwanted sex because once a sexual encounter begins,
interactional pressures may make it difficult to stop the encounter without breaking general
rules (causing disruption or embarrassing someone).
o Safe face  turning down a sexual opportunity may make a man lose face precisely
because he is a man. It can cause a embarrassing situation.
o Making sense to others  doing what is expected. People generally conform to
what is expected and accomplish upholding a sense of social order in situ.
2. Gender norms  if an attractive women provide an opportunity for sex, men should pursue
it because they are driven by sexual urges. Some men have unwanted sex because of their
fear that other men will stigmatize them if they do not.

Findings: Generic interactional processes + gender norms = unwanted sex
- Unwanted sex because it was easier than saying no
- Unwanted sex to smoothen interaction and not lose face
- Unwanted sex because of gendered expectations
- Overtly performing their masculinity through sex

In contrast to findings of other scholars, men did worry about what women thought about them.
Women may judge for not hooking up with them.

Three ways to avoid having sex and not lose face
1. If the woman was not attractive enough
2. If the woman was intoxicated
3. When an interaction was interrupted abruptly

Conclusion:
- Interactional processes (such as saving face and making sense) + gender norms = unwanted
sex
- Communicative morality is informed by gender norms. Gender neutral interactional
processes were not sufficient to explain unwanted sex. Instead gender specific interactional
processes.
- Women have more power than is otherwise understood because women’s accounts have
consequences for men’s sense of self. Men also believe that women’s reports of the
interaction will be credible to others.
- Men had unwanted sex by their own volition, so they didn’t frame these encounters as
sexual assault.


D’Emilio, J. (1983). Capitalism and gay identity.
The myth of the eternal homosexual isn’t true. Homosexuals have not always existed according to
D’Emilio. They are a product of capitalism.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller esmeestek. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $4.50. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81503 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$4.50  1x  sold
  • (0)
  Add to cart