100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
HC's part 2 clinical psychology notes $9.42   Add to cart

Class notes

HC's part 2 clinical psychology notes

 7 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

lecture notes, second part of the course linked to book; Kring & Johnson (2022), Abnormal Psychology, The Science and Treatment of Psychological Disorders (15th Edition)

Preview 4 out of 39  pages

  • September 12, 2024
  • 39
  • 2023/2024
  • Class notes
  • -
  • All classes
avatar-seller
clinical psychology hc’s part 2

Lecture 1: psychotic disorders

metacognitive psychotherapy for psychosis
TED talk: Sachs → see slides

learning goals:
● what the symptoms are and recognize these cases
● explain how the various different diagnoses relate to one another; differentiate these
form psychotic symptoms in other disorders
● provide a general picture of how biological. psychological and social factors all seem
to contribute to the risk of psychosis
● interventions

what is psychosis?
● formally; disruption in the experience of reality/reality testing
● DSM does not enter the debate on what is ‘psychotic’ but explicitly chooses to define
psychosis in terms of symptoms
○ this is significantly broader than ‘reality testing’
● symptoms can be subdivided in different ways
○ in all models positive (adding something to reality) and negative (distract from
life)
■ positive: hearing voices
■ negative: fled emotions
● some models add domains for example
○ disorganized (DSM)
○ thought disorder
● trauma is a huge factor; a experience before or the experience of the first psychosis

hallucinations (Positive symptom)
● are perception-like experiences which occur without an external stimulus
○ lifelike
○ full force and impact of normal perception
○ can occur in all modalities
○ most common: auditory (voices)
● In some (sub) cultures, hallucinations are considered normal (religious) experience.

Are psychotic symptoms unusual?
● audiovisual hallucination
○ children around 8; +/- 9%
○ general population: 5%-28%
● imaginary friends



1

, ○ children 5-12 year: 46%

Delusions (positive symptom)
● beliefs/convictions which conflict with reality
● DSM-IV: are erroneous beliefs that usually involve a misinterpretation of perceptions
and experiences
● belief —> delusion where do you draw the line
● DSM-5 are fixed beliefs that are not amenable to change in light of conflicting
evidence
● DSM 5: are fixed beliefs that are not amenable to change in light of conflicting
evidence
● types
○ most common:
■ persecutory: they are after me.. → fear
■ referential: things that are not related to you, feel related to you
○ less often
■ somatic; body experiences, belief that you have bugs under the skin
■ grandiosity: Believe that you will become president
■ erotomanic; celebrity X is in love with me → can induce action
■ nihilistic; impending catastrophe; the world is gonna end
● bizarre vs. non bizarre
○ DSM IV; clearly implausible and not understandable and not derived form
ordinary life experiences
○ DSM 5: delusions are deemed bizarre if they are clearly implausible and not
understandable to same culture peers and do not derive from experiences
■ → are not used anymore since they are so hard to distinguish
sometimes, it needs context

negative symptoms
● common:
○ reduced expressivity
○ avolition: reduces self-motivated, goal oriented activities
● less common:
○ alogia: reduced speech production
○ anhedonia: reduced enjoyment
○ a-sociality: reduced interest in social activities

disorganized symptoms
● disorganized speech: waterfall speech
● catatonic behavior; motor disruption

other symptoms
● anosognosia: believe that you are not ill; reduced insight in illness


2

, ● disrupted self experience → their self has shattered not splitted (DID)
● social cognition/metacognition/mentalizing
○ abilities to understand others and the social world
● different constructs all point to structural and important, deficits in social cognition

Clinical profile:




Delusional disorder: differential diagnosis (thesis suggestion; very complex field)
● with oCD or BDD: even if the belief of catastrophe/body experience is extremely
solidified and there is anosognosia OCD or BDD fits better than delusional disorder
● with mood disorders: similar to schizoaffective disorder, symptoms of mood have to
be relatively short compared to symptoms of delusional disorder




epidemiology
● schizophrenia
○ incidence (how many per year); around 15 new cases per 100 000 persons
○ prevalence (how many people have the disorder currently): 0.7-1%


3

, Diagnostic: classification
● praecox gefuhl: feeling that you cannot reach each other
● careful: differentiate psychotic episode (or psychosis from psychotic disorder)
● (semi) structured interviews

Other symptoms
● Jumping to conclusions
● neurocognition: digit span test

Etiology
● biological/neurological perspective: dopamine hypothesis
○ strong genetic component
○ slightly more men than women
■ woman have a little more symptoms, but social functioning remains a
bit better
● Medication implies that dopamine is at the foundation of (positive) symptoms
○ but don’t barely work on negative symptoms
● Aberrant Salience model

Social factors
● being a migrant is a risk factor for development of schizophrenia
● urbanicity is a risk factor
Psychological factors
● trauma (50-98% of patients)
● 80% of patients experience their psychotic episodes as traumatic too
● prevalence PTSD comorbid 16%
● 90% of case files do not mention PTSD, though it is present
● example of development of mentalizing abilities
○ develops in early childhood, environment-driven
■ deafness/deprivation impedes development
■ association found between hearing difficulties, trauma in development
and later psychotic symptoms/disorders
■ differences were found on social responsiveness between children who
later develop schizophrenia vs. bipolar vs. controls
Explanatory models
● cognitive model for example

Etiology - so what’s the deal?
● take home message: biopsychosocial model and diathesis-stress model are the shared
foundation of most models
● neurobiological and cognitive models support one another in most cases
● on great example: social defeat hypothesis



4

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sachahofstee. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $9.42. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

78998 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$9.42
  • (0)
  Add to cart