Often, crimes are characterized as either malum in se—inherently evil—or malum
prohibitum—criminal because they are declared as offenses by a legislature. Murder is an
example of the former. Failing to file a tax return illustrates the latter. Some jurisdictions no
longer distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum, although many still
do. - Answer -From the information given above, it can be validly concluded that
some jurisdictions still distinguish between crimes malum in se and malum prohibitum
A trucking company can act as a common carrier—for hire to the general public at
published rates. As a common carrier, it is liable for any cargo damage, unless the
company can show that it was not negligent. If the company can demonstrate that it was
not negligent, then it is not liable for cargo damage. In contrast, a contract carrier (a
trucking company hired by a shipper under a specific contract) is only responsible for cargo
damage as spelled out in the contract. A Claus Inc. tractor-trailer, acting under common
carrier authority, was in a 5- vehicle accident that damaged its cargo. A Nichols Inc. tractor-
trailer, acting under contract carrier authority, was involved in the same accident, and its
cargo was also damaged. - Answer -From the information given above, it can be validly
concluded that, in reference to the accident,
if Claus Inc. can show that it was not negligent, then it is not liable
A rapidly changing technical environment in government is promoting greater reliance on
electronic mail (email) systems. As this usage grows, there are increasing chances of
conflict between the users' expectations of privacy and public access rights. In some
investigations, access to all e-mail, including those messages stored in archival files and
messages outside the scope of the investigation, has been sought and granted. In spite of
this, some people send messages through e-mail that would never be said face-to-face or
written formally. - Answer -From the information given above, it CANNOT be validly
concluded that
some e-mail messages that have been requested as part of investigations have contained
messages that would never be said face-to-face
Phyllis T. is a former Federal employee who was entitled to benefits under the Federal
Employee Compensation Act because of a job-related, disabling injury. When an eligible
Federal employee has such an injury, the benefit is determined by this test: If the
beneficiary is married or has dependents, benefits are 3/4 of the person's salary at the time
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller millyphilip. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.