Exam (elaborations)
BLAW 3310 Miller UTA Exam #1 Ch. 1-7 questions and answers verified answers||Latest 2024/2025
- Course
- Institution
BLAW 3310 Miller UTA Exam #1 Ch. 1-7 questions and answers verified answers||Latest 2024/2025
[Show more]
Content preview
BLAW 3310 Miller UTA Exam #1 Ch. 1-7Plessy v Ferguson - ANSseparate but equal is okay, precedent--let the states decide, limit
federal power
Brown v Board of Education - ANSoverturn Plessy v Ferguson, sep is NOT equal, 14th
amendment
Miller v Smith - ANSWife proves Fraud--more steps, more naggingly particular--Fraudy Fred
State of Texas v Miller - ANSTX said Miller can't have gun per criminal statutes, Miller said
violation of 4th, 5th, 14th amdmts.--unreasonable search and seizure, due process, equal
treatment
Blimka v My Web Wholesalers - ANS"long arm" of law--interstate commerce, blue jeans in
Idaho, shall be in Idaho Jurisdiction b/c plaintiff in
Wickard v Filburn - ANSfamily farm, Commerce Clause, Art. 1 Sec. 8, Increase Supreme power
over interstate commerce
Heart of Atlanta Motel - ANS"local" racist hotel, nah can't discrim bec art 2 of civil rights act,
interstate commerce involving transport of individuals. due to commerce clause
Katzenbach v McClung - ANSBBQ joint, locally racist...nah, per commerce clause, out of state
ppl want food too thus subject to 14th federal----burdening interstate trading
Hughes v Oklahoma - ANSTX cowboy farms minnows in OK, takes em back to TX for sale. OK
says Not Okay, bec. state reg. Supreme says this impedes interstate commerce
Southern Railway v Arizona - ANSArizona makes short train lengths, for safety. This impedes
interstate commerce---this AZ code pone desvenjada a los otros estados
Bank of Boston case - ANScan bank make corporate campaign contributions to political
candidates? Yes, to impede would violate 1st amendment free speech rights
Palsgraf v Long Island Railway - ANSlady gets hit in face with fireworks waiting for train---no this
was not negligence because reasonable care was taken, that event was unforeseeable, no
proximate cause here
Lawler v Montblanc - ANSLawler got sick, couldn't work her job, denied disability. Emotional
distress not applicable here (unethical yes)---not "severe"
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller QualityPDF. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $10.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
79373 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now