Exam (elaborations)
500 MPRE PRACTICE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WITH SOLUTIONS 2024
- Course
- Institution
500 MPRE PRACTICE QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS WITH SOLUTIONS 2024
[Show more]
Content preview
500 MPRE PRACTICE QUESTIONS ANDANSWERS WITH SOLUTIONS 2024
1. Conglomerate Corporation owns a little more than half the stock of Giant Company. Conglomerate's
stock, in turn, is public, available on the public stock exchange, as is the remainder of the stock in Giant
Company. The president of Conglomerate Corporation has asked Attorney Stevenson to represent Giant
Company in a deal by which Giant would make a proposed transfer of certain real property to
Conglomerate Corporation. The property in question is unusual because it contains an underground
particle collider used for scientific research, but also valuable farmland on the surface, as well as some
valuable mineral rights in another part of the parcel. These factors make the property value difficult to
assess by reference to the general real-estate market, which means it is difficult for anyone to determine
the fairness of the transfer price in the proposed deal. Would it be proper for Attorney Stevenson to
facilitate - ANSWER d) No, not unless the attorney first obtains effective informed consent of the
management of Giant Company, as well as that of Conglomerate, because the ownership of
Conglomerate and Giant is not identical, and their interests materially differ in the proposed transaction.
RESTATEMENT § 131
2. Mr. Burns, the chief executive officer of Conglomerate Corporation, now faces criminal charges of
discussing prices with the president of a competing firm. If found guilty, both Mr. Burns and
Conglomerate Corporation will be subject to civil and criminal penalties under state and federal antitrust
laws. An attorney has been representing Conglomerate Corporation. She has conducted a thorough
investigation of the matter, and she has personally concluded that no such pricing discussions occurred.
Both Conglomerate Corporation and Mr. Burns plan to defend on that ground. Mr. Burns has asked the
attorney to represent him, as well as Conglomerate Corporation, in the proceedings. The legal and
factual defenses of Conglomerate Corporation and Mr. Burns seem completely consistent at the outset
of the matter. Would the attorney need to obtain informed consent to a conflict of interest from both Mr.
Burns and a separate corp - ANSWER a) Yes, the likelihood of conflicting positions
in such matters as plea bargaining requires the attorney to obtain the informed consent of both clients
before proceeding with the representation.
RESTATEMENT § 131
3. An attorney decides to purchase "litigation cost protection" insurance for matters she handles on a
contingency fee basis. Plaintiffs' lawyers can buy this type of insurance on a case-by-case basis, for a one-
time premium payment. The insurance is available for purchase up to three months after the filing of the
initial complaint. Note that this policy is separate and distinct from malpractice liability insurance. The
purpose of this type of insurance is to reimburse the attorney for litigation costs advanced by the
,attorney - only in the event of a trial loss. Do the Model Rules of Professional Conduct prohibit the
attorney from purchasing litigation cost protection insurance for her contingency fee cases?
a) Yes, because the client and the attorney may have different cost-benefit calculations.
b) Yes, for an attorney may prefer that his
client accept a low settlement offer to ensure that the attorney receives - ANSWER d) No, the attorney
may purchase litigation cost protection insurance so long as she does not allow the terms of the
coverage to adversely affect her independent professional judgment, the client-lawyer relationship, or
the client's continuing best interests.
N.C Formal Ethics Op. 2018-6
4. An attorney purchased "litigation cost protection" insurance at the outset of representing a plaintiff in
a personal injury case. When the attorney recovered funds for the client through a settlement or
favorable trial verdict, the attorney proposed to receive reimbursement for the insurance premium from
the judgment or settlement funds. The attorney disclosed the cost of the insurance to the client as part
of the representation agreement. Was it proper for the attorney to include in a client's fee agreement a
provision allowing the attorney's purchase of litigation cost protection insurance and requiring
reimbursement of the insurance premium from the client's funds in the event of a settlement or
favorable trial verdict?
a) Yes, because the Model Rules do not purport to regulate insurance for lawyers, which is a matter of
state statute.
b) Yes, if the amount charged to the client is fair and reasonable, and t - ANSWER b) Yes, if the amount
charged to the client is fair and reasonable, and the lawyer fully explains to the client what litigation cost
protection insurance is, why the lawyer believes a litigation cost protection policy will serve the client's
best interests, that the client should get the advice of independent legal counsel regarding the
arrangement, that other lawyers may advance the client's costs without charging the client the cost of a
litigation cost protection policy; and the client gives informed consent in writing, while the lawyer
maintains independent professional judgment.
,N.C Formal Ethics Op. 2018-6
5. Mr. Burns, the chief executive officer of Conglomerate Corporation, now faces criminal charges of
discussing prices with the president of a competing firm. If found guilty, both Mr. Burns and
Conglomerate Corporation will be subject to civil and criminal penalties under state and federal antitrust
laws. An attorney has been representing Conglomerate Corporation. She has conducted a thorough
investigation of the matter, and she has personally concluded that such pricing discussions did in fact
occur. Both Mr. Burns and Conglomerate Corporation have stopped their denials, and they now concede
that the pricing discussions took place. One of Mr. Burns' defenses will be that the former general
counsel of Conglomerate Corporation had advised Mr. Burns that a discussion of general pricing
practices with a competitor would not be illegal. In contrast, Conglomerate Corporation denies that this
was the legal advice given, a - ANSWER d) No, the conflicting positions between Conglomerate and Mr.
Burns are so great that the same lawyer cannot provide adequate legal representation to both, so
consent to the conflict is ineffective.
N.C Formal Ethics Op. 2018-6
6. Big Firm represents hundreds of corporate clients out of a dozen offices in different states. The firm
has no formal procedures in place to check for conflicts at the outset of representation for new clients,
but the managing partner of the firm has an incredible memory and has never failed to spot a potential
conflict of interest in the past. An attorney agrees to represent a new corporate client that owns many
subsidiaries, and checks with the managing partner, who assured Attorney there are no potential
conflicts. After the new corporate client had disclosed a substantial amount of confidential information,
it emerged that some of its subsidiaries were directly adverse to other clients of Big Firm. The attorney
was completely unaware of the potential conflicts at the time he agreed to the representation, despite
asking the corporate client a few questions about the opposing parties in pending litigation it migh -
ANSWER a) Yes, because ignorance caused by a failure to institute reasonable procedures, appropriate
for the size and type of firm and practice, will not excuse a lawyer's violation of the Rules regarding
conflicts of interest.
7. An attorney sued Giant Company on behalf of a client in a personal injury matter. During the
protracted litigation that ensued, Conglomerate bought Giant Company. The attorney was already
representing Conglomerate in a regulatory compliance matter before a federal administrative agency.
Assuming this development was unforeseeable at the outset of representing the client against Giant
Company, will the attorney have the option to withdraw from one of the representations to avoid the
conflict?
, a) Yes, because one matter is in state court and the other matter is a completely unrelated federal
administrative proceeding.
b) Yes, but the attorney must seek court approval where necessary and take steps to minimize harm to
the clients, and he must continue to protect the confidences of the client from whose representation the
lawyer has withdrawn.
c) No, if a conflict arises after representation is underway, the lawye - ANSWER b) Yes, but the attorney
must seek court approval where necessary and take steps to minimize harm to the clients, and he must
continue to protect the confidences of the client from whose representation the lawyer has withdrawn.
8. A husband and wife decide to divorce and reach an agreement to share the same lawyer in hopes of
saving money. They hire an attorney to represent each of them in Family Court for the dissolution of
marriage. The attorney explains that there is an obvious conflict of interest here, but the husband and
wife insist, and sign informed consent forms waiving the conflict and their rights to assert any future
claims related to the conflict. The husband and wife have no children, and they have always kept
separate bank accounts. Each purchased their own car from the money in their own bank account and
each car's title is in only one name. They live in an apartment whose lease is expiring soon, so there is no
real property to divide. Would it be proper for the attorney to represent both in the divorce?
a) Yes, because it appears on these facts that
there will be no assets in dispute at all, so the theoretical conflict of - ANSWER d) No, because the
representation involves the assertion of a claim by one client against another client represented by the
lawyer in the same litigation or other proceeding before a tribunal.
9. Three individuals plan to form a joint venture and ask an attorney to represent them in drafting the
necessary documents and making the necessary filings with government agencies. They have already
agreed that everyone will contribute exactly one-third of the startup funds for the venture, each will own
a one-third share, each will have equal control over the Board, and each agrees to indemnify the others
for a one- third share of any personal liability related to the joint venture. They have also agreed that
they will have no non-compete agreements. The joint venture will hire managers, marketers, and other
employees to operate the business. The three individuals are co-owners of a patent that could
potentially be very lucrative when they bring it to market, and they have known each other and worked
together for a long time. The attorney cannot find any current areas of conflict between them, though he
knows that - ANSWER b) Yes, because the mere possibility of
subsequent harm does not itself require
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Performance. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $23.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
82191 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now