100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary OCR A-level English Literature Paper 2 Carter and Banks Comparative Essay revision notes $11.66   Add to cart

Summary

Summary OCR A-level English Literature Paper 2 Carter and Banks Comparative Essay revision notes

 9 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Institution

A* revision notes for The Gothic comparative essay between Carter's 'The Bloody Chamber and Banks' The Wasp Factory in section 2, Paper 2 of the OCR A-level English Literature. These notes contain a concise summary of everything you need to know about how to achieve each AO for this question, an in...

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 16  pages

  • August 20, 2024
  • 16
  • 2023/2024
  • Summary
avatar-seller
OCR A-level Paper 2 – The Gothic

Contents:
Gothic Comparative Essay Mark Scheme – page 2
General Essay Plan – page 3
Carter and Banks Comparative Essay Theme Plans – page 5
A* Gothic Comparative Essay Example – page 13




1

, Below is an overview of the mark scheme and what the examiners will be looking for, for
each AO of the Ibsen and Rossetti Comparative Essay in Section 2 of Paper 1. In these notes,
I have created a general essay plan in which you can follow along with my thematic essay
plans which outline key comparative points between Ibsen and Rossetti in which you can
expand on, allowing you to hit AO4. You’ll notice that the structure of each paragraph in the
general essay plan is quite repetitive, but this allows the essay to have a structured feel for
the examiner, thus achieving AO1. To help achieve AO5, I have also provided a concise list of
critics that you can include for each theme in my essay plans. I have not provided revision
notes for AO3, as I believe that for this comparative study, it is best to research the authors
yourself to build an understanding of them in your own words  .




Gothic Comparative Essay Mark Scheme:
AO1: Quality of writing AO3: context (50%) AO4: Connections and AO5: Interpretation and
(12.52%)  Considered relevant Comparisons (25%) debate (12.5%)
 Accurate SPAG- capitals historical and social  Outlined the way the  Used critics to back up
 Title of individual context of the time texts (both Banks and argument- quoted
stories in inverted  Considered context of Carter) can be read in them and called them
commas: ‘The Bloody reception response to the by name
Chamber’, ‘The Erl-  Considered the question  Referred to specific
King’ etc. context of production  Made at least 3 reviews
 Considered a range of  Placed the text within explicit links between  Considered critical
stories by Carter (at the Gothic canon- e.g. Banks and Carter perspectives in order
least 3) considered where it  Considered similarities to set up debate and
 Referred back to the comes in the and differences in interpretation
words of the question chronology of the terms of language or  Considered what
 Well structured essay Gothic and what affect gothic feature and questions the text
 Literary terminology this has had on the purpose raises in response to
used production of it  Compared and this theme/idea
 Well-crafted and  Considered Gothic contrasted specific  Considered your own
developed concepts such as narrative techniques point of view and
introduction female Gothic, the opinion. Be tentative
 Focused and concise sublime, sensibility, and offer options.
conclusion Romanticism, willing  2-sided debate
 Relevant critical suspension of disbelief  Evaluative structure to
perspectives used etc. the essay
accurately  Made relevant and
 Quotes helpful links to other
Gothic texts




General Essay Plan:
2

, For this essay plan, I have provided a basic paragraph structure that each of your paragraphs
should follow, PEA. Below that is a list of content that each of your paragraphs should
contain whilst following the PEA paragraph structure. This follows directly with the Carter
and Banks comparative essay plans that I have made for each comparative theme in Carter’s
The Bloody Chamber and Banks’ The Wasp Factory.

Introduction:
• Unpack the wording of the question
◦ Discuss briefly what the question means (show that you understand the key words
of the question)
‣ What do the specific words mean in relation to the texts - what is your
interpretation of the question.
• How well does this apply to the Gothic in general
• Place texts in terms of the Gothic canon - link back to question
• Place texts in terms of historical context - link back to question
• Consider how both texts are similar in relation to question - link to their themes
• Consider a key difference in the texts in relation to question

Main body paragraphs:
*make 2 points for the question, and 1 against -> OR (if not possible) 2 against the question,
and 1 for.

Paragraph 1:
• Point - start with a confident, comparative topic sentence (an answer for the question)
◦ "In both texts…"
• Evidence/Analysis - make argument on how one text conveys this (links to context / critics)
+ link back to key words of question
• Comparison point - say how the other text is similar
◦ "Similarly..."
• Evidence/Analysis - make argument on how other text conveys this (links context / critics)
• Link back to key words of question - how does the author use the Gothic to portray their
viewpoint
• (If possible) Counter-point - suggest how this text also differs from the previous point (how
does it challenge the previous idea and provide an alternative argument)
◦ “However…”
• Evidence/Analysis - make argument on how the text conveys this (links context / critics)
• Link back to key words of question - how does the author use the Gothic to portray their
viewpoint
• Conclusion - sum up main points made in the paragraph (draw out similarities and
differences)
◦ Develop reasons for differences between texts - link to authors' different aims and
agendas
◦ "Overall,..."
◦ "This difference is likely because..."
Paragraph 2:

3

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hayleygeorge15. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $11.66. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$11.66
  • (0)
  Add to cart