Exam (elaborations)
LJU4801 Assignment 2 2024 |Due 3 Sept 2024
- Course
- Institution
LJU4801 Assignment 2 2024
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Hometutor
Reviews received
Content preview
LJU4801ASSIGNMENT 2
DUE: 3 SEPT 2024
2024
, LJU4801 Assignment 2
Due: 3 September 2024
Question 1
1. With reference to the judgment in Prince v President of the Law Society of
the Cape of Good Hope 2002 (2) SA 794, discuss the philosophical
approaches the majority and minority decisions followed. Your answer
should not exceed
750 words
Philosophical Approaches in Prince v President of the Law Society of the Cape
of Good Hope
In the case of Prince v. President of the Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope, the
Constitutional Court of South Africa dealt with a major legal issue concerning the
prohibition of cannabis in the context of religious freedom. The case centered on
Garreth Anver Prince, who aspired to become an attorney but was barred due to his
previous convictions for cannabis possession and his intention to continue using
cannabis as part of his Rastafari faith. The Court’s majority and minority opinions
showcased different philosophical approaches to legal interpretation and decision-
making.
Majority Decision: Legal Positivism
The majority opinion, written by Justice Ngcobo, largely followed a legal positivist
philosophy. Legal positivism focuses on the significance of the existing written laws
and rules, avoiding moral or metaphysical discussions. It is concerned with what the
law currently is rather than what it should ideally be.
The majority focused on whether the prohibition of cannabis use was inconsistent with
the Constitution. As stated in the judgment:
"The question before us, therefore, is not whether we agree with the law prohibiting
the possession and use of cannabis. Our views in that regard are irrelevant. The
only question is whether the law is inconsistent with the Constitution. The appellant
contends that it is because it interferes with his right to freedom of religion and his
right to practise his religion".3
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Hometutor. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for $2.84. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
81113 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now