100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Exploring Consumers’ Answers to Survey Questions: Are Uninformed Responses Truly Uninformed? $16.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

Exploring Consumers’ Answers to Survey Questions: Are Uninformed Responses Truly Uninformed?

 11 views  0 purchase
  • Course
  • Exploring Consumers
  • Institution
  • Exploring Consumers

Stimuli Development To identify schematic and aschematic questions, a pretest survey was administered to 80 consumers. Subjects were asked the following four questions to measure their knowledge of fictitious information. 1. Which U.S. Company sells more industrial drill bits?  Thompson, Inc....

[Show more]

Preview 3 out of 25  pages

  • August 7, 2024
  • 25
  • 2024/2025
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
  • Exploring Consumers
  • Exploring Consumers
avatar-seller
TIFFACADEMICS
Exploring Consumers’
Answers to Survey
Questions: Are Uninformed
Responses Truly
Uninformed?
Timothy R. Graeff
Middle Tennessee State University




ABSTRACT

Researchers have observed that consumers often give answers to
questions about which they are uninformed. Drawing from work in
cognitive psychology, this research explores why, how, and when
consumers answer survey questions about which they are
uninformed. Results from a telephone survey of 1348 consumers
suggest that the effects of stimulus factors designed to increase item
response rates (pressure to respond in the introduction to the
survey, absence of a DK option) are moderated by consumers’
familiarity with other similar-sounding attitude objects.
Implications for future research are discussed. 䉷 2003 Wiley
Periodicals, Inc.



Marketers routinely rely on the results from survey research to measure
consumers’ awareness of their brands as well as consumers’ attitudes
and feelings toward their brands. In the area of public policy, surveys
and poll results often guide decisions about important issues such as
taxation, defense, and diplomacy (Norton-Smith, 1994; B. I. Page & Sha-
piro, 1983; Worchester, 1997). Coupled with the increased reliance on
surveys is the recognition of a most troubling form of bias in survey
Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 20(7): 643–667 (July 2003)
Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com)
䉷 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. DOI: 10.1002/mar.10090
643

,research — the uninformed response bias. People often give opinions on
issues about which they are uninformed (Bishop, Oldendick, Tuchfar-
ber, & Bennett, 1980; Gilljam & Granberg, 1993; Hartley, 1946; Schu-
man & Presser, 1981). Survey respondents have freely given opinions
about fictitious governmental agencies and congressional bills (Bishop,
Oldendick, & Tuchfarber, 1983; Bishop, Tuchfarber, & Oldendick, 1986;
Schuman & Presser, 1980). Respondents have also given opinions about
fictitious political figures (Kolson & Green, 1970) and have given direc-
tions to places that do not exist (Collett & O’Shea, 1976). In each case,
those expressing opinions were by definition uninformed because the
issues were fictitious — thus the name uninformed response bias.
The importance of uniformed responses to decision makers is obvious.
If consumers provide answers (opinions) to questions about which they
are uninformed, marketing and business decisions might be based on
meaningless answers to survey questions. The increasing reliance on
the results of survey research to make marketing and public-policy de-
cisions begs for greater understanding of why, how, and when respon-
dents give opinions on issues about which they are uninformed.
An additional problem for marketers is that efforts to increase item
response rates might actually increase uninformed response rates. Un-
informed respondents can be pressured to provide meaningless answers
to survey questions (Converse, 1964, 1970, 1974; Kanuk & Berenson,
1975; Linsky, 1975; Yu & Cooper, 1983). Research demonstrates that
pressuring respondents to answer survey questions increases unin-
formed response rates, and reducing pressure to respond [offering a
“don’t know” (DK) option] reduces uninformed response rates (Graeff,
2002). However, offering a DK option does not eliminate uninformed
responses. Even when uninformed respondents are allowed to honestly
and easily admit that they lack the required knowledge or have no opin-
ion, the majority of respondents still offer an uninformed opinion (Haw-
kins & Coney, 1981).

Are Uninformed Responses Truly Uninformed?
To measure consumers’ uninformed responses, researchers are faced
with a methodological dilemma. It is necessary to use fictitious issues
to measure uninformed responses. The rationale is straightforward (see
Schneider, 1985). If consumers are asked questions about real issues or
brands, there is no way of determining if a response is informed or un-
informed. Thus, when consumers are asked a question about a fictitious
issue, any response other than DK is considered by definition to be un-
informed. Consumers cannot be informed and have knowledge or mem-
ory structures about something that does not exist.
The methodological dilemma is that the fictitious issues must sound
plausible. If not, respondents could easily identify them as fictitious.
For example, researchers have examined uninformed responses to


644 GRAEFF

, seemingly plausible fictitious agencies such as the National Bureau of
Consumer Complaint (Hawkins & Coney, 1981) and fictitious legislation
such as the Public Affairs Act, Agricultural Trade Act, and the Monetary
Control Bill (Bishop, Oldendick, & Tuchfarber, 1983; Bishop, Tuchfar-
ber, & Oldendick, 1986). Consumers have every right to expect that
questions asked of them are about real issues, and these appear to be
real pieces of legislation and governmental agencies. But are consumers’
responses to such seemingly plausible, albeit fictitious, issues truly un-
informed?
Unfortunately, the understanding of uninformed responses has been
limited to the effects of stimulus factors and contextual cues on the
probability of respondents offering uninformed responses (Bradburn &
Sudman, 1988; Gilljam & Granberg, 1993; Krosnick & Alwin, 1987;
Schuman & Presser, 1981). Such stimulus factors include the presence
of a DK option, pressure to respond, and mode of survey contact (phone
versus mail versus personal interview; Ayidiya & McClendon, 1990;
Bishop, Oldendick & Tuchfarber, 1983; Bishop, Oldendick, Tuchfarber
& Bennett, 1980; Bishop, Tuchfarber & Oldendick, 1986; Hawkins &
Coney, 1981; Schneider, 1985).
Previous research has not considered consumers’ level of familiarity
with similar-sounding attitude objects. What has been identified as un-
informed responses might actually consist of responses from consumers
who are unfamiliar with the attitude object (they have never encoun-
tered it, nor do they have any knowledge of it) as well as consumers who
are familiar with similar-sounding attitude objects. Truly unfamiliar
consumers might simply guess in order to respond. Alternatively, con-
sumers who are familiar with similar-sounding attitude objects might
think that they know the answer, but are incorrect in their knowledge
because they are truly mistaken about the object being evaluated. Con-
sumers in previous studies might have based their evaluations of the
fictitious government agencies on inferences drawn from their related
knowledge of similar-sounding real agencies. They might have been
guided by a heuristic that researchers do not ask fictitious questions,
and the name of the attitude object was close enough to confuse them.
Thus, they would not consider themselves to be uninformed. Rather,
their familiarity with a similar-sounding attitude object guided their
survey response.

Knowledge Schemas and Survey Responses
A cognitive explanation of uninformed responses suggests that consum-
ers use knowledge schemas to answer survey questions. A knowledge
schema is a mental structure containing general expectations and
knowledge of the world (Augoustinos & Walker, 1995). Schemas influ-
ence the encoding of new information, memory for old information, and
inferences about missing information (Fiske & Taylor, 1991; Taylor &


UNINFORMED RESPONSES 645

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TIFFACADEMICS. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for $16.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77988 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling
$16.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart